与摇头丸(MDMA)使用相关的副作用建模

J. Fisk, P. Murphy, C. Montgomery, Florentia Hadjiefthyvoulou
{"title":"与摇头丸(MDMA)使用相关的副作用建模","authors":"J. Fisk, P. Murphy, C. Montgomery, Florentia Hadjiefthyvoulou","doi":"10.2174/1874941001104010030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RESULTS Using the total number of adverse effects reported as the dependent variable, significant relationships were found for weeks since last ecstasy use and estimated lifetime ecstasy consumption, these relationships being negative and positive, respectively. Weeks since first ecstasy use and the frequency of its use per week were not related to the total number of adverse effects reported. Additionally, the dependent variable was positively related to the frequency of concurrent alcohol and ecstasy use, daytime sleepiness (i.e. poor sleep quality), anxiety, and level of concern about the adverse effects of ecstasy use. Self ratings of general health were negatively related to the dependent variable. Significant relationships were not found with the number of precautions taken when ecstasy was used, awareness that ecstasy use may have harmful effects, depression, or the concurrent use with ecstasy of amphetamine, cannabis, or cocaine. CONCLUSIONS The results show that the total number of self-reported adverse effects attributed to the use of ecstasy is positively related to lifetime consumption, but inversely related to duration of abstinence from the drug. This latter effect could reflect the return of some neuronal functions to a pre-ecstasy use level [9-10]. Overall duration and frequency of use do not appear to be related to the level of adverse effects reported. The lack of relationship between awareness of ecstasy’s effects and the total of adverse effects reported does not support the assertion that users’ reports of such effects may be magnified in any substantial way by media and other influences [6]. The concurrent use of alcohol, rather than cannabis, with ecstasy may be an important area for future research [4].","PeriodicalId":89289,"journal":{"name":"The open addiction journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"30-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling the Adverse Effects Associated With Ecstasy (MDMA) Usage\",\"authors\":\"J. Fisk, P. Murphy, C. Montgomery, Florentia Hadjiefthyvoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874941001104010030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"RESULTS Using the total number of adverse effects reported as the dependent variable, significant relationships were found for weeks since last ecstasy use and estimated lifetime ecstasy consumption, these relationships being negative and positive, respectively. Weeks since first ecstasy use and the frequency of its use per week were not related to the total number of adverse effects reported. Additionally, the dependent variable was positively related to the frequency of concurrent alcohol and ecstasy use, daytime sleepiness (i.e. poor sleep quality), anxiety, and level of concern about the adverse effects of ecstasy use. Self ratings of general health were negatively related to the dependent variable. Significant relationships were not found with the number of precautions taken when ecstasy was used, awareness that ecstasy use may have harmful effects, depression, or the concurrent use with ecstasy of amphetamine, cannabis, or cocaine. CONCLUSIONS The results show that the total number of self-reported adverse effects attributed to the use of ecstasy is positively related to lifetime consumption, but inversely related to duration of abstinence from the drug. This latter effect could reflect the return of some neuronal functions to a pre-ecstasy use level [9-10]. Overall duration and frequency of use do not appear to be related to the level of adverse effects reported. The lack of relationship between awareness of ecstasy’s effects and the total of adverse effects reported does not support the assertion that users’ reports of such effects may be magnified in any substantial way by media and other influences [6]. The concurrent use of alcohol, rather than cannabis, with ecstasy may be an important area for future research [4].\",\"PeriodicalId\":89289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open addiction journal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"30-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open addiction journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874941001104010030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874941001104010030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

结果使用报告的不良反应总数作为因变量,发现自最后一次使用摇头丸的周数和估计终生摇头丸消费量之间存在显著关系,这些关系分别为负和正。第一次使用摇头丸的周数和每周使用的频率与报告的不良反应总数无关。此外,因变量与同时使用酒精和摇头丸的频率、白天嗜睡(即睡眠质量差)、焦虑和对使用摇头丸的不良影响的关注程度呈正相关。一般健康自我评分与因变量呈负相关。使用摇头丸时采取的预防措施的数量、对使用摇头丸可能产生有害影响的认识、抑郁、或与安非他明、大麻或可卡因同时使用的摇头丸没有发现显著的关系。结论:自述因使用摇头丸引起的不良反应总数与终生服用摇头丸量呈正相关,与戒药时间呈负相关。后一种效应可能反映了一些神经元功能恢复到狂喜前的使用水平[9-10]。总体持续时间和使用频率似乎与报告的不良反应水平无关。对摇头丸效果的认识与所报告的不良影响总数之间缺乏关系,这不能支持使用者对此类影响的报告可能被媒体和其他影响以任何实质性方式放大的断言。与摇头丸同时使用酒精而不是大麻可能是未来研究的一个重要领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modelling the Adverse Effects Associated With Ecstasy (MDMA) Usage
RESULTS Using the total number of adverse effects reported as the dependent variable, significant relationships were found for weeks since last ecstasy use and estimated lifetime ecstasy consumption, these relationships being negative and positive, respectively. Weeks since first ecstasy use and the frequency of its use per week were not related to the total number of adverse effects reported. Additionally, the dependent variable was positively related to the frequency of concurrent alcohol and ecstasy use, daytime sleepiness (i.e. poor sleep quality), anxiety, and level of concern about the adverse effects of ecstasy use. Self ratings of general health were negatively related to the dependent variable. Significant relationships were not found with the number of precautions taken when ecstasy was used, awareness that ecstasy use may have harmful effects, depression, or the concurrent use with ecstasy of amphetamine, cannabis, or cocaine. CONCLUSIONS The results show that the total number of self-reported adverse effects attributed to the use of ecstasy is positively related to lifetime consumption, but inversely related to duration of abstinence from the drug. This latter effect could reflect the return of some neuronal functions to a pre-ecstasy use level [9-10]. Overall duration and frequency of use do not appear to be related to the level of adverse effects reported. The lack of relationship between awareness of ecstasy’s effects and the total of adverse effects reported does not support the assertion that users’ reports of such effects may be magnified in any substantial way by media and other influences [6]. The concurrent use of alcohol, rather than cannabis, with ecstasy may be an important area for future research [4].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信