线索暴露疗法治疗成瘾性疾病的进展:综述更新

T. Martin, S. Larowe, R. Malcolm
{"title":"线索暴露疗法治疗成瘾性疾病的进展:综述更新","authors":"T. Martin, S. Larowe, R. Malcolm","doi":"10.2174/1874941001003010092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the role of cue exposure therapy in addiction treatment. Methods: A Pubmed/PsycInfo literature search was performed for cue exposure treatments for addictions from 2002 to 2009. Findings: We located sixteen cue exposure therapy studies involving multiple addictions that were conducted between 2002 and 2009. Four of these studies consisted of clinical efficacy trials that assessed drug use after Cue Exposure Therapy (CET). In three of the four trials, cue exposure was no better or worse than the comparison therapy. Two trials showed somewhat worse retention in those receiving CET and one appeared to have higher relapse rates in those receiving CET. We did not find evidence of safety concerns in any of the four trials. Several promising methodological innovations included use of virtual reality, medication augmentation, investigation of renewal effects, use of fMRI methods, and study of individual differences. Conclusions: Superior efficacy for CET over other forms of general treatment has not been demonstrated. However, research in this area may yet be advanced through adequately powered, multi-site CET trials combining multiple methodological innovations including investigation of individual differences and medication augmentation. Until such trials are conducted, cue exposure treatment for addiction will remain a speculative and uncommonly used therapy in clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":89289,"journal":{"name":"The open addiction journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"92-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Progress in Cue Exposure Therapy for the Treatment of Addictive Disorders: A Review Update\",\"authors\":\"T. Martin, S. Larowe, R. Malcolm\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874941001003010092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To evaluate the role of cue exposure therapy in addiction treatment. Methods: A Pubmed/PsycInfo literature search was performed for cue exposure treatments for addictions from 2002 to 2009. Findings: We located sixteen cue exposure therapy studies involving multiple addictions that were conducted between 2002 and 2009. Four of these studies consisted of clinical efficacy trials that assessed drug use after Cue Exposure Therapy (CET). In three of the four trials, cue exposure was no better or worse than the comparison therapy. Two trials showed somewhat worse retention in those receiving CET and one appeared to have higher relapse rates in those receiving CET. We did not find evidence of safety concerns in any of the four trials. Several promising methodological innovations included use of virtual reality, medication augmentation, investigation of renewal effects, use of fMRI methods, and study of individual differences. Conclusions: Superior efficacy for CET over other forms of general treatment has not been demonstrated. However, research in this area may yet be advanced through adequately powered, multi-site CET trials combining multiple methodological innovations including investigation of individual differences and medication augmentation. Until such trials are conducted, cue exposure treatment for addiction will remain a speculative and uncommonly used therapy in clinical settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open addiction journal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"92-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"45\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open addiction journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874941001003010092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874941001003010092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

摘要

目的:评价提示暴露疗法在成瘾治疗中的作用。方法:检索2002 - 2009年Pubmed/PsycInfo关于提示暴露治疗成瘾的文献。研究结果:我们找到了2002年至2009年间进行的涉及多种成瘾的16项提示暴露治疗研究。其中四项研究包括评估提示暴露治疗(CET)后药物使用的临床疗效试验。在四项试验中的三项中,提示暴露并不比比较疗法更好或更差。两项试验显示,接受CET治疗的患者保留率稍差,一项试验显示,接受CET治疗的患者复发率较高。在这四项试验中,我们没有发现安全问题的证据。一些有希望的方法创新包括使用虚拟现实、药物增强、更新效果的调查、使用功能磁共振成像方法和个体差异的研究。结论:尚未证明CET优于其他形式的一般治疗。然而,这一领域的研究还可以通过充分有力的多地点CET试验来推进,这些试验结合了多种方法创新,包括研究个体差异和药物增加。在进行这样的试验之前,线索暴露治疗成瘾仍然是一种推测性的治疗方法,在临床环境中不常用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Progress in Cue Exposure Therapy for the Treatment of Addictive Disorders: A Review Update
Objectives: To evaluate the role of cue exposure therapy in addiction treatment. Methods: A Pubmed/PsycInfo literature search was performed for cue exposure treatments for addictions from 2002 to 2009. Findings: We located sixteen cue exposure therapy studies involving multiple addictions that were conducted between 2002 and 2009. Four of these studies consisted of clinical efficacy trials that assessed drug use after Cue Exposure Therapy (CET). In three of the four trials, cue exposure was no better or worse than the comparison therapy. Two trials showed somewhat worse retention in those receiving CET and one appeared to have higher relapse rates in those receiving CET. We did not find evidence of safety concerns in any of the four trials. Several promising methodological innovations included use of virtual reality, medication augmentation, investigation of renewal effects, use of fMRI methods, and study of individual differences. Conclusions: Superior efficacy for CET over other forms of general treatment has not been demonstrated. However, research in this area may yet be advanced through adequately powered, multi-site CET trials combining multiple methodological innovations including investigation of individual differences and medication augmentation. Until such trials are conducted, cue exposure treatment for addiction will remain a speculative and uncommonly used therapy in clinical settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信