评估老年人的身体活动:来自赫特福德郡队列研究的发现

H. Martin, H. Syddall, E. Dennison, V. Cox, C. Cooper, A. Sayer
{"title":"评估老年人的身体活动:来自赫特福德郡队列研究的发现","authors":"H. Martin, H. Syddall, E. Dennison, V. Cox, C. Cooper, A. Sayer","doi":"10.2174/1874827900801010043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Physical activity (PA) is difficult to assess and few instruments are relevant to older people. We have developed a self-administered PA questionnaire (HPAQ) for the Hertfordshire Cohort Study; we report its feasibility and validity and describe PA participation in older people. Methods: 525 participants completed the HPAQ; 15 women also completed the EPAQ-2 for validation. Activity participa- tion was described using percentage participation, estimated energy expenditure and cluster analysis. Results: Most participants found the HPAQ simple to complete. Agreement between the HPAQ and EPAQ-2 was good. Activities with highest participation rates and energy expenditures were walking (99.6%, 149.8 MET.h/mth) for men and home activities (100%, 287.1 MET.h/mth) for women. Clustering identified three patterns of activity participation for men (\"Keep Fit\", \"Indoors\" & \"Less active\"), and two for women (\"Keep Fit\" & \"Indoors\"). Conclusions: The HPAQ is a feasible and valid PA questionnaire for older people. Clustering identified different patterns of PA participation.","PeriodicalId":89035,"journal":{"name":"The open geriatric medicine journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"43-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Physical Activity in Older People: Findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"H. Martin, H. Syddall, E. Dennison, V. Cox, C. Cooper, A. Sayer\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874827900801010043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Physical activity (PA) is difficult to assess and few instruments are relevant to older people. We have developed a self-administered PA questionnaire (HPAQ) for the Hertfordshire Cohort Study; we report its feasibility and validity and describe PA participation in older people. Methods: 525 participants completed the HPAQ; 15 women also completed the EPAQ-2 for validation. Activity participa- tion was described using percentage participation, estimated energy expenditure and cluster analysis. Results: Most participants found the HPAQ simple to complete. Agreement between the HPAQ and EPAQ-2 was good. Activities with highest participation rates and energy expenditures were walking (99.6%, 149.8 MET.h/mth) for men and home activities (100%, 287.1 MET.h/mth) for women. Clustering identified three patterns of activity participation for men (\\\"Keep Fit\\\", \\\"Indoors\\\" & \\\"Less active\\\"), and two for women (\\\"Keep Fit\\\" & \\\"Indoors\\\"). Conclusions: The HPAQ is a feasible and valid PA questionnaire for older people. Clustering identified different patterns of PA participation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open geriatric medicine journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"43-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open geriatric medicine journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874827900801010043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open geriatric medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874827900801010043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:身体活动(PA)很难评估,很少有工具与老年人相关。我们为赫特福德郡队列研究开发了一份自我管理的PA问卷(HPAQ);我们报告了其可行性和有效性,并描述了老年人参与PA的情况。方法:525名参与者完成HPAQ;15名女性还完成了EPAQ-2验证。活动参与用参与率、估计能量消耗和聚类分析来描述。结果:大多数参与者认为HPAQ易于完成。HPAQ与EPAQ-2的一致性较好。参与率和能量消耗最高的活动是男性步行(99.6%,149.8 MET.h/月)和女性家庭活动(100%,287.1 MET.h/月)。聚类确定了男性的三种活动参与模式(“保持健康”,“室内”和“较少活动”),女性的两种模式(“保持健康”和“室内”)。结论:HPAQ是一份适用于老年人的有效问卷。聚类识别出PA参与的不同模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Physical Activity in Older People: Findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study
Background: Physical activity (PA) is difficult to assess and few instruments are relevant to older people. We have developed a self-administered PA questionnaire (HPAQ) for the Hertfordshire Cohort Study; we report its feasibility and validity and describe PA participation in older people. Methods: 525 participants completed the HPAQ; 15 women also completed the EPAQ-2 for validation. Activity participa- tion was described using percentage participation, estimated energy expenditure and cluster analysis. Results: Most participants found the HPAQ simple to complete. Agreement between the HPAQ and EPAQ-2 was good. Activities with highest participation rates and energy expenditures were walking (99.6%, 149.8 MET.h/mth) for men and home activities (100%, 287.1 MET.h/mth) for women. Clustering identified three patterns of activity participation for men ("Keep Fit", "Indoors" & "Less active"), and two for women ("Keep Fit" & "Indoors"). Conclusions: The HPAQ is a feasible and valid PA questionnaire for older people. Clustering identified different patterns of PA participation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信