带与不带下腔静脉交叉夹持的背驮式技术用于原位肝移植

M. Sette, E. Lopes, Â. Ferraz, M. Maia, M. Barros, M. Machado, T. Bacchella, R. Cury, H. Sette, E. Ferraz
{"title":"带与不带下腔静脉交叉夹持的背驮式技术用于原位肝移植","authors":"M. Sette, E. Lopes, Â. Ferraz, M. Maia, M. Barros, M. Machado, T. Bacchella, R. Cury, H. Sette, E. Ferraz","doi":"10.2174/1874418400903010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to compare the piggyback technique with and without inferior vena cava cross-clamping (IVC-CC). Between 2002 and 2005 at two Hospitals in Brazil, 136 patients were submitted to orthotopic liver transplant (OLT), but 36 were excluded due to the employment of different techniques. Depending on the piggyback technique em- ployed, the remaining 100 patients were divided into two groups: Group A (with IVC-CC) = 47 patients; and Group B (without IVC-CC) = 53 patients. The study revealed that the OLT using piggyback with IVC-CC took less time (1.39 hours) and required less blood transfusion, however a higher dosis of noradrenaline administration was necessary. No sta- tistical differences were observed between the two groups regarding hemodynamic parameters during the surgery, or any impairment of the kidney and liver functions in the early post-operative period. In conclusion, the piggyback with IVC- CC required less surgical time and less units of blood transfusion.","PeriodicalId":90368,"journal":{"name":"The open transplantation journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"4-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Piggyback Technique with and without Inferior Vena Cava Cross- Clamping for Orthotopic Liver Transplant\",\"authors\":\"M. Sette, E. Lopes, Â. Ferraz, M. Maia, M. Barros, M. Machado, T. Bacchella, R. Cury, H. Sette, E. Ferraz\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874418400903010004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to compare the piggyback technique with and without inferior vena cava cross-clamping (IVC-CC). Between 2002 and 2005 at two Hospitals in Brazil, 136 patients were submitted to orthotopic liver transplant (OLT), but 36 were excluded due to the employment of different techniques. Depending on the piggyback technique em- ployed, the remaining 100 patients were divided into two groups: Group A (with IVC-CC) = 47 patients; and Group B (without IVC-CC) = 53 patients. The study revealed that the OLT using piggyback with IVC-CC took less time (1.39 hours) and required less blood transfusion, however a higher dosis of noradrenaline administration was necessary. No sta- tistical differences were observed between the two groups regarding hemodynamic parameters during the surgery, or any impairment of the kidney and liver functions in the early post-operative period. In conclusion, the piggyback with IVC- CC required less surgical time and less units of blood transfusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open transplantation journal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"4-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open transplantation journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874418400903010004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open transplantation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874418400903010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较有无下腔静脉交叉夹紧(IVC-CC)的背驮式技术。2002年至2005年,在巴西的两家医院,136名患者接受了原位肝移植(OLT),但有36名患者因采用不同的技术而被排除在外。根据所采用的背驮式技术,其余100例患者分为两组:A组(下腔静脉- cc) = 47例;B组(无IVC-CC) 53例。研究显示,使用背驮式IVC-CC的OLT花费更少的时间(1.39小时),需要更少的输血,但需要更高剂量的去甲肾上腺素。两组患者在手术过程中的血流动力学参数以及术后早期肾脏和肝脏功能的损害均无统计学差异。综上所述,下腔静脉- CC背驮式手术所需的手术时间更短,输血单位更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Piggyback Technique with and without Inferior Vena Cava Cross- Clamping for Orthotopic Liver Transplant
This study aimed to compare the piggyback technique with and without inferior vena cava cross-clamping (IVC-CC). Between 2002 and 2005 at two Hospitals in Brazil, 136 patients were submitted to orthotopic liver transplant (OLT), but 36 were excluded due to the employment of different techniques. Depending on the piggyback technique em- ployed, the remaining 100 patients were divided into two groups: Group A (with IVC-CC) = 47 patients; and Group B (without IVC-CC) = 53 patients. The study revealed that the OLT using piggyback with IVC-CC took less time (1.39 hours) and required less blood transfusion, however a higher dosis of noradrenaline administration was necessary. No sta- tistical differences were observed between the two groups regarding hemodynamic parameters during the surgery, or any impairment of the kidney and liver functions in the early post-operative period. In conclusion, the piggyback with IVC- CC required less surgical time and less units of blood transfusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信