非发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的喹诺酮类抗生素预防:是否有足够的证据表明死亡率有影响?

G. Cota, T. Fereguetti, M. R. Sousa
{"title":"非发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的喹诺酮类抗生素预防:是否有足够的证据表明死亡率有影响?","authors":"G. Cota, T. Fereguetti, M. R. Sousa","doi":"10.2174/1874279301206010015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Febrile neutropenia causes significant morbidity and mortality in patients receiving antineoplastic chemotherapy. During the last decade, some trials have shown reduction in febrile episodes and bacteraemia with antibiotic prophylaxis. On the other hand, the emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria in units practicing quinolones prophylaxis has been described and there is justified concern about the implications of this fact. Recent published guidelines now recommend quinolones prophylaxis for patients with neutropenia expected to last as least 7 days. They are based in a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled or no treatment-controlled trials of quinolone prophylaxis, which demonstrated risk reduction in mortality among drug treated recipients. In contrast, previous meta-analyses and the two major trials with two thirds of the number of patients of the largest meta-analysis failed to show this survival advantage. Using two sensitive tests, Egger's and Trim and Fill methods, we found a \"small study effect\" which acts exaggerating and making the result positive when they are probably neutral. In spite of the considerable number of trials and reviews involving prophylactic antibiotics for neutropenic patients, available evidence is hypothesis generator but not sufficient to state there is mortality benefit.","PeriodicalId":88330,"journal":{"name":"The open infectious diseases journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Quinolones in Afebrile Neutropenic Patients: Is there Enough Evidence for Mortality Effect?\",\"authors\":\"G. Cota, T. Fereguetti, M. R. Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874279301206010015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Febrile neutropenia causes significant morbidity and mortality in patients receiving antineoplastic chemotherapy. During the last decade, some trials have shown reduction in febrile episodes and bacteraemia with antibiotic prophylaxis. On the other hand, the emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria in units practicing quinolones prophylaxis has been described and there is justified concern about the implications of this fact. Recent published guidelines now recommend quinolones prophylaxis for patients with neutropenia expected to last as least 7 days. They are based in a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled or no treatment-controlled trials of quinolone prophylaxis, which demonstrated risk reduction in mortality among drug treated recipients. In contrast, previous meta-analyses and the two major trials with two thirds of the number of patients of the largest meta-analysis failed to show this survival advantage. Using two sensitive tests, Egger's and Trim and Fill methods, we found a \\\"small study effect\\\" which acts exaggerating and making the result positive when they are probably neutral. In spite of the considerable number of trials and reviews involving prophylactic antibiotics for neutropenic patients, available evidence is hypothesis generator but not sufficient to state there is mortality benefit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open infectious diseases journal\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"15-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open infectious diseases journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874279301206010015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open infectious diseases journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874279301206010015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发热性中性粒细胞减少症在接受抗肿瘤化疗的患者中引起显著的发病率和死亡率。在过去十年中,一些试验表明,通过抗生素预防可以减少发热发作和菌血症。另一方面,在实施喹诺酮类药物预防的单位中出现了氟喹诺酮耐药细菌,对这一事实的影响有理由感到关切。最近出版的指南现在建议中性粒细胞减少症患者预防喹诺酮类药物预计持续至少7天。它们是基于对喹诺酮预防的安慰剂对照或无治疗对照试验的荟萃分析,这些试验表明接受药物治疗的患者死亡率风险降低。相比之下,之前的荟萃分析和两项主要试验的三分之二的患者数量最大的荟萃分析未能显示出这种生存优势。使用两个敏感的测试,Egger's和Trim and Fill方法,我们发现了一种“小研究效应”,当结果可能是中性的时候,它会夸大并使结果成为阳性。尽管有相当数量的试验和综述涉及中性粒细胞减少患者的预防性抗生素,现有的证据是假设,但不足以说明有死亡率的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Quinolones in Afebrile Neutropenic Patients: Is there Enough Evidence for Mortality Effect?
Febrile neutropenia causes significant morbidity and mortality in patients receiving antineoplastic chemotherapy. During the last decade, some trials have shown reduction in febrile episodes and bacteraemia with antibiotic prophylaxis. On the other hand, the emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria in units practicing quinolones prophylaxis has been described and there is justified concern about the implications of this fact. Recent published guidelines now recommend quinolones prophylaxis for patients with neutropenia expected to last as least 7 days. They are based in a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled or no treatment-controlled trials of quinolone prophylaxis, which demonstrated risk reduction in mortality among drug treated recipients. In contrast, previous meta-analyses and the two major trials with two thirds of the number of patients of the largest meta-analysis failed to show this survival advantage. Using two sensitive tests, Egger's and Trim and Fill methods, we found a "small study effect" which acts exaggerating and making the result positive when they are probably neutral. In spite of the considerable number of trials and reviews involving prophylactic antibiotics for neutropenic patients, available evidence is hypothesis generator but not sufficient to state there is mortality benefit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信