{"title":"比沙布尔和达拉布吉尔的罗马皇帝乌拉尼乌斯·安东尼努斯和埃米萨的黑石","authors":"B. Overlaet","doi":"10.2143/IA.44.0.2034386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Roman emperors on the rock reliefs of Shapur I at Darabgird and Bishapur are traditionally identified as Gordianus III, Philippus Arabs and Valerianus. The foreign delegations / prisoners on the Bishapur III relief have been interpreted as a reference to both the Roman Empire and the Eastern frontiers of the Sasanian Empire (Kushan). These references are evaluated and an alternative interpretation is considered. The Bishapur III sculpture is seen as referring to Shapur's Syrian campaign in 253 AD. A heavy object among the booty is identified as the black stone of Emesa (ancient Homs in Syria), a famous baethyl. The \"spoils of war\", such as the large boulder (stone of Emesa, depicted twice), a cart, textiles and vessels, all relate to its cult. The Roman emperor is identified as the Roman usurper-emperor Uranius Antoninus, the last in line of the priest-kings of Emesa. Historic sources relate this meeting between Shapur and Uranius Antoninus (called Sampsigeramos). The Roman emperor is depicted kneeling in supplication and standing as an ally next to Shapur's horse. Bishapur II and Darabgird represent the same event. This dates these reliefs to 254 AD.","PeriodicalId":43366,"journal":{"name":"Iranica Antiqua","volume":"44 1","pages":"461-530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/IA.44.0.2034386","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Roman emperor at Bishapur and Darabgird - Uranius Antoninus and the Black Stone of Emesa\",\"authors\":\"B. Overlaet\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/IA.44.0.2034386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Roman emperors on the rock reliefs of Shapur I at Darabgird and Bishapur are traditionally identified as Gordianus III, Philippus Arabs and Valerianus. The foreign delegations / prisoners on the Bishapur III relief have been interpreted as a reference to both the Roman Empire and the Eastern frontiers of the Sasanian Empire (Kushan). These references are evaluated and an alternative interpretation is considered. The Bishapur III sculpture is seen as referring to Shapur's Syrian campaign in 253 AD. A heavy object among the booty is identified as the black stone of Emesa (ancient Homs in Syria), a famous baethyl. The \\\"spoils of war\\\", such as the large boulder (stone of Emesa, depicted twice), a cart, textiles and vessels, all relate to its cult. The Roman emperor is identified as the Roman usurper-emperor Uranius Antoninus, the last in line of the priest-kings of Emesa. Historic sources relate this meeting between Shapur and Uranius Antoninus (called Sampsigeramos). The Roman emperor is depicted kneeling in supplication and standing as an ally next to Shapur's horse. Bishapur II and Darabgird represent the same event. This dates these reliefs to 254 AD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranica Antiqua\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"461-530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/IA.44.0.2034386\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranica Antiqua\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/IA.44.0.2034386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranica Antiqua","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/IA.44.0.2034386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
在Darabgird和Bishapur的Shapur I岩石浮雕上的罗马皇帝传统上被认为是Gordianus III, Philippus Arabs和Valerianus。比沙普尔三世浮雕上的外国代表团/囚犯被解释为罗马帝国和萨珊帝国(贵霜)东部边界的参考。对这些参考文献进行评估,并考虑另一种解释。比沙普尔三世的雕塑被认为是指公元253年沙普尔在叙利亚的战役。在战利品中发现的一件重物被确认为埃梅萨(Emesa,叙利亚的古霍姆斯)的黑石,这是一种著名的baethyl。“战利品”,如巨石(埃米萨的石头,描绘了两次),一辆马车,纺织品和船只,都与它的崇拜有关。罗马皇帝被确定为罗马篡位皇帝乌拉尼乌斯·安东尼努斯,埃米萨祭司国王的最后一位。历史资料记载了沙普尔和乌拉尼乌斯·安东尼努斯(被称为Sampsigeramos)之间的这次会面。罗马皇帝被描绘成跪着祈祷,作为一个盟友站在沙普尔的马旁边。比沙普尔二世和达拉吉德代表了同一事件。这些浮雕的年代是公元254年。
A Roman emperor at Bishapur and Darabgird - Uranius Antoninus and the Black Stone of Emesa
The Roman emperors on the rock reliefs of Shapur I at Darabgird and Bishapur are traditionally identified as Gordianus III, Philippus Arabs and Valerianus. The foreign delegations / prisoners on the Bishapur III relief have been interpreted as a reference to both the Roman Empire and the Eastern frontiers of the Sasanian Empire (Kushan). These references are evaluated and an alternative interpretation is considered. The Bishapur III sculpture is seen as referring to Shapur's Syrian campaign in 253 AD. A heavy object among the booty is identified as the black stone of Emesa (ancient Homs in Syria), a famous baethyl. The "spoils of war", such as the large boulder (stone of Emesa, depicted twice), a cart, textiles and vessels, all relate to its cult. The Roman emperor is identified as the Roman usurper-emperor Uranius Antoninus, the last in line of the priest-kings of Emesa. Historic sources relate this meeting between Shapur and Uranius Antoninus (called Sampsigeramos). The Roman emperor is depicted kneeling in supplication and standing as an ally next to Shapur's horse. Bishapur II and Darabgird represent the same event. This dates these reliefs to 254 AD.
期刊介绍:
Iranica Antiqua is one of the leading scholarly journals covering studies on the civilization of pre-Islamic Iran in its broadest sense. This annual publication, edited by the Department for Near Eastern Art and Archaeology at Gent University, Belgium, contains preliminary excavation reports, contributions on archaeological problems, studies on different aspects of history, institutions, religion, epigraphy, numismatics and history of art of ancient Iran, as well as on cultural exchanges and relations between Iran and its neighbours.