伊朗国家博物馆的一把刻有文字的匕首:是赝品还是真品?

IF 0.2 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
A. Vahdati
{"title":"伊朗国家博物馆的一把刻有文字的匕首:是赝品还是真品?","authors":"A. Vahdati","doi":"10.2143/IA.42.0.2017877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past seventy years inscribed bronze objects were reported in considerable numbers from unknown sites said to be in Luristan. A major group of these inscribed bronzes are weapons, predominantly daggers. This paper discusses an inscribed bronze dagger, alleged fro Luristan, which is now housed in the national Museum of Iran, Tehran. Taking a closer look at the dagger and its inscriptions, I propose that it can not typologically be attributed to the Achaemenid period and its inscription is a fake. Although the dagger has early first millennium parallels in western Iran, I suggest before it is accepted as genuine, that it be submitted to technical analysis to see if the inscription has been engraved on a genuine blade.","PeriodicalId":43366,"journal":{"name":"Iranica Antiqua","volume":"42 1","pages":"221-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/IA.42.0.2017877","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An inscribed dagger at the national museum of Iran : Forgery or genuine?\",\"authors\":\"A. Vahdati\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/IA.42.0.2017877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the past seventy years inscribed bronze objects were reported in considerable numbers from unknown sites said to be in Luristan. A major group of these inscribed bronzes are weapons, predominantly daggers. This paper discusses an inscribed bronze dagger, alleged fro Luristan, which is now housed in the national Museum of Iran, Tehran. Taking a closer look at the dagger and its inscriptions, I propose that it can not typologically be attributed to the Achaemenid period and its inscription is a fake. Although the dagger has early first millennium parallels in western Iran, I suggest before it is accepted as genuine, that it be submitted to technical analysis to see if the inscription has been engraved on a genuine blade.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranica Antiqua\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"221-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/IA.42.0.2017877\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranica Antiqua\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/IA.42.0.2017877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranica Antiqua","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/IA.42.0.2017877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的七十年里,据报道有相当数量的刻有铭文的青铜器来自据说在Luristan的未知地点。这些刻有铭文的青铜器中有一大类是武器,主要是匕首。这篇文章讨论了一个刻有铭文的青铜匕首,据称来自Luristan,现在被安置在德黑兰的伊朗国家博物馆。仔细观察这把匕首和它的铭文,我认为它不能被类型学上归因于阿契美尼德时期,它的铭文是假的。虽然这把匕首在伊朗西部最早的千年时期也有相似之处,但我建议在它被认为是真品之前,先对它进行技术分析,看看上面的铭文是否刻在真品刀刃上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An inscribed dagger at the national museum of Iran : Forgery or genuine?
In the past seventy years inscribed bronze objects were reported in considerable numbers from unknown sites said to be in Luristan. A major group of these inscribed bronzes are weapons, predominantly daggers. This paper discusses an inscribed bronze dagger, alleged fro Luristan, which is now housed in the national Museum of Iran, Tehran. Taking a closer look at the dagger and its inscriptions, I propose that it can not typologically be attributed to the Achaemenid period and its inscription is a fake. Although the dagger has early first millennium parallels in western Iran, I suggest before it is accepted as genuine, that it be submitted to technical analysis to see if the inscription has been engraved on a genuine blade.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranica Antiqua
Iranica Antiqua ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Iranica Antiqua is one of the leading scholarly journals covering studies on the civilization of pre-Islamic Iran in its broadest sense. This annual publication, edited by the Department for Near Eastern Art and Archaeology at Gent University, Belgium, contains preliminary excavation reports, contributions on archaeological problems, studies on different aspects of history, institutions, religion, epigraphy, numismatics and history of art of ancient Iran, as well as on cultural exchanges and relations between Iran and its neighbours.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信