Il-Dong Song, Ju‐Seop Kang, Hyunjin Kim, Semi Kim, Dongxue Zhao, Shin-Hee Kim, M. Chun, Kyu-Hyun Lee
{"title":"27名韩国人血浆中依托度酸的定量药代动力学和生物等效性研究。","authors":"Il-Dong Song, Ju‐Seop Kang, Hyunjin Kim, Semi Kim, Dongxue Zhao, Shin-Hee Kim, M. Chun, Kyu-Hyun Lee","doi":"10.2174/1872312811666170116151004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE We developed a simple and validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry( LC-MS/MS) for quantification of etodolac using pioglitazone as an internal standard (IS) to assess pharmacokinetics and to appraise bioequivalence of two formulations of etodolac (reference and tested) in 27 healthy Korean subjects. METHODS Isocratic mobile phase consisted of 10 mM ammonium formate and acetonitrile were used to separate the analytes on a Gemini C18 column. Also, analytes were analyzed by MS/MS in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using the transitions of (M+H)+ ions, m/z 288.2→ 172.3 and m/z 357.1→ 134.2 for quantification of etodolac and IS each. The standard calibration curves displayed significant linearity within the range of 0.2-30.0 μ g/mL (r2=0.9956, 1/x2 weighting) with LLOQ of 0.1 μg/mL. RESULTS The retention times of etodolac and the IS were 0.77 min and 0.57 min each, indicating the high-throughput potential of the proposed method. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the plasma samples and data form the reference and test drugs were represented as follows; Area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUCt) (78.03 vs. 84.00 μgxh/mL), AUC∞ (86.67 vs. 93.92 μgxh/mL), maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) (19.49 vs. 18.94 μg/mL), time for maximal concentrations (Tmax) (2.13 vs. 2.26 h), Plasma elimination half-life (T1/2) (8.12 vs. 8.47 h), elimination rate constant (λz) (0.0853 vs. 0.0818 h-1). Pharmacokinetic parameters with 90% confidence interval fall within the bioequivalence range of 80-125%. CONCLUSION Thus, the new testified method was successfully applied for the pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence studies for two etodolac formulations.","PeriodicalId":11339,"journal":{"name":"Drug metabolism letters","volume":"10 4 1","pages":"286-294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of Etodolac in Human Plasma for Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Studies in 27 Korean Subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Il-Dong Song, Ju‐Seop Kang, Hyunjin Kim, Semi Kim, Dongxue Zhao, Shin-Hee Kim, M. Chun, Kyu-Hyun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1872312811666170116151004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE We developed a simple and validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry( LC-MS/MS) for quantification of etodolac using pioglitazone as an internal standard (IS) to assess pharmacokinetics and to appraise bioequivalence of two formulations of etodolac (reference and tested) in 27 healthy Korean subjects. METHODS Isocratic mobile phase consisted of 10 mM ammonium formate and acetonitrile were used to separate the analytes on a Gemini C18 column. Also, analytes were analyzed by MS/MS in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using the transitions of (M+H)+ ions, m/z 288.2→ 172.3 and m/z 357.1→ 134.2 for quantification of etodolac and IS each. The standard calibration curves displayed significant linearity within the range of 0.2-30.0 μ g/mL (r2=0.9956, 1/x2 weighting) with LLOQ of 0.1 μg/mL. RESULTS The retention times of etodolac and the IS were 0.77 min and 0.57 min each, indicating the high-throughput potential of the proposed method. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the plasma samples and data form the reference and test drugs were represented as follows; Area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUCt) (78.03 vs. 84.00 μgxh/mL), AUC∞ (86.67 vs. 93.92 μgxh/mL), maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) (19.49 vs. 18.94 μg/mL), time for maximal concentrations (Tmax) (2.13 vs. 2.26 h), Plasma elimination half-life (T1/2) (8.12 vs. 8.47 h), elimination rate constant (λz) (0.0853 vs. 0.0818 h-1). Pharmacokinetic parameters with 90% confidence interval fall within the bioequivalence range of 80-125%. CONCLUSION Thus, the new testified method was successfully applied for the pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence studies for two etodolac formulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug metabolism letters\",\"volume\":\"10 4 1\",\"pages\":\"286-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug metabolism letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1872312811666170116151004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug metabolism letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1872312811666170116151004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的以吡格列酮为内标(IS),建立一种简单有效的液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)定量方法,评价两种制剂(参比制剂和被试制剂)在27名健康韩国受试者体内的药代动力学和生物等效性。方法以10mm甲酸铵和乙腈为流动相,采用Gemini C18色谱柱分离。利用(M+H)+离子的跃迁,M /z 288.2→172.3和M /z 357.1→134.2,采用多反应监测(MRM)模式对分析物进行质谱分析,分别定量乙酸乙酯和IS。在0.2 ~ 30.0 μg/mL范围内线性良好(r2=0.9956, 1/x2加权),定量限为0.1 μg/mL。结果依托度酸和IS的保留时间分别为0.77 min和0.57 min,表明该方法具有较高的通量潜力。根据血浆样品计算药代动力学参数,参比药和试验药数据如下:血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUCt) (78.03 vs. 84.00 μgxh/mL)、AUC∞(86.67 vs. 93.92 μgxh/mL)、最大血浆浓度(Cmax) (19.49 vs. 18.94 μgxh)、最大浓度时间(Tmax) (2.13 vs. 2.26 h)、血浆消除半衰期(T1/2) (8.12 vs. 8.47 h)、消除速率常数(λz) (0.0853 vs. 0.0818 h-1)。90%置信区间的药代动力学参数在80-125%的生物等效性范围内。结论该方法可用于两种依托度酸制剂的药动学和生物等效性研究。
Quantification of Etodolac in Human Plasma for Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Studies in 27 Korean Subjects.
OBJECTIVE We developed a simple and validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry( LC-MS/MS) for quantification of etodolac using pioglitazone as an internal standard (IS) to assess pharmacokinetics and to appraise bioequivalence of two formulations of etodolac (reference and tested) in 27 healthy Korean subjects. METHODS Isocratic mobile phase consisted of 10 mM ammonium formate and acetonitrile were used to separate the analytes on a Gemini C18 column. Also, analytes were analyzed by MS/MS in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode using the transitions of (M+H)+ ions, m/z 288.2→ 172.3 and m/z 357.1→ 134.2 for quantification of etodolac and IS each. The standard calibration curves displayed significant linearity within the range of 0.2-30.0 μ g/mL (r2=0.9956, 1/x2 weighting) with LLOQ of 0.1 μg/mL. RESULTS The retention times of etodolac and the IS were 0.77 min and 0.57 min each, indicating the high-throughput potential of the proposed method. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the plasma samples and data form the reference and test drugs were represented as follows; Area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUCt) (78.03 vs. 84.00 μgxh/mL), AUC∞ (86.67 vs. 93.92 μgxh/mL), maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) (19.49 vs. 18.94 μg/mL), time for maximal concentrations (Tmax) (2.13 vs. 2.26 h), Plasma elimination half-life (T1/2) (8.12 vs. 8.47 h), elimination rate constant (λz) (0.0853 vs. 0.0818 h-1). Pharmacokinetic parameters with 90% confidence interval fall within the bioequivalence range of 80-125%. CONCLUSION Thus, the new testified method was successfully applied for the pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence studies for two etodolac formulations.
期刊介绍:
Drug Metabolism Letters publishes letters and research articles on major advances in all areas of drug metabolism and disposition. The emphasis is on publishing quality papers very rapidly by taking full advantage of the Internet technology both for the submission and review of manuscripts. The journal covers the following areas: In vitro systems including CYP-450; enzyme induction and inhibition; drug-drug interactions and enzyme kinetics; pharmacokinetics, toxicokinetics, species scaling and extrapolations; P-glycoprotein and transport carriers; target organ toxicity and interindividual variability; drug metabolism and disposition studies; extrahepatic metabolism; phase I and phase II metabolism; recent developments for the identification of drug metabolites.