1789-1920年美国小说中的种族和民族代表

Q1 Arts and Humanities
M. Algee-Hewitt, J. Porter, Hannah Walser
{"title":"1789-1920年美国小说中的种族和民族代表","authors":"M. Algee-Hewitt, J. Porter, Hannah Walser","doi":"10.22148/001c.18509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our project, which aims to reconstruct racial discourse in American literature, tracks three critical aspects of the representation of race and ethnicity in a corpus of over 18,000 American novels published between 1789 and 1920. First, we provide a historically sensitive account of the ethnicities that most occupied the nation’s racial imaginary, registering how different ethnic groups were perceived to be biologically, geographically, or socially linked. Second, we track the descriptive terms most associated with particular ethnicities over time as we trace the changing discursive fields surrounding particular racial groups. Finally, we explore the coherence of the discourse around each race and ethnicity represented across American literature before 1920, paying close attention to the ways in which various groups did or did not exist as semantically unified groups at specific historical moments. Taken together, our three questions show not just who was under discussion and how, but also the history—and historicity—of racialization and ethnic thinking writ large. Our goal in this paper is to identify and surface the racialized language of American Fiction and to face the harms that it caused without eliding its historical violence and force. At the same time, while we feel that confronting such racism is important work, we do not want to perpetuate the harm that this language, including many slurs, continues to cause to oppressed peoples, particularly in the Black and Native American communities. To that end, throughout this paper, we have adopted the practice of Brigitte Fielder, among others, in representing particularly harmful terms using the following convention: n[-----].","PeriodicalId":33005,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Analytics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representing Race and Ethnicity in American Fiction, 1789-1920\",\"authors\":\"M. Algee-Hewitt, J. Porter, Hannah Walser\",\"doi\":\"10.22148/001c.18509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our project, which aims to reconstruct racial discourse in American literature, tracks three critical aspects of the representation of race and ethnicity in a corpus of over 18,000 American novels published between 1789 and 1920. First, we provide a historically sensitive account of the ethnicities that most occupied the nation’s racial imaginary, registering how different ethnic groups were perceived to be biologically, geographically, or socially linked. Second, we track the descriptive terms most associated with particular ethnicities over time as we trace the changing discursive fields surrounding particular racial groups. Finally, we explore the coherence of the discourse around each race and ethnicity represented across American literature before 1920, paying close attention to the ways in which various groups did or did not exist as semantically unified groups at specific historical moments. Taken together, our three questions show not just who was under discussion and how, but also the history—and historicity—of racialization and ethnic thinking writ large. Our goal in this paper is to identify and surface the racialized language of American Fiction and to face the harms that it caused without eliding its historical violence and force. At the same time, while we feel that confronting such racism is important work, we do not want to perpetuate the harm that this language, including many slurs, continues to cause to oppressed peoples, particularly in the Black and Native American communities. To that end, throughout this paper, we have adopted the practice of Brigitte Fielder, among others, in representing particularly harmful terms using the following convention: n[-----].\",\"PeriodicalId\":33005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cultural Analytics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cultural Analytics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.18509\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.18509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的项目旨在重建美国文学中的种族话语,追踪1789年至1920年间出版的18000多本美国小说中种族和民族表现的三个关键方面。首先,我们对占据国家种族想象最多的种族提供了历史敏感的描述,记录了不同的种族群体是如何被认为在生物学上、地理上或社会上联系在一起的。其次,随着时间的推移,我们追踪了与特定种族最相关的描述性术语,因为我们追踪了围绕特定种族群体不断变化的话语领域。最后,我们探讨了1920年之前美国文学中所代表的每个种族和民族的话语的连贯性,密切关注不同群体在特定历史时刻作为语义统一群体存在或不存在的方式。总的来说,我们的三个问题不仅显示了谁在讨论以及如何讨论,而且还显示了种族化和民族思想的历史和历史性。本文的目的是识别和揭示美国小说的种族化语言,并正视它所造成的伤害,而不忽略其历史上的暴力和力量。与此同时,虽然我们认为对抗这种种族主义是一项重要的工作,但我们不想让这种语言,包括许多侮辱,继续对受压迫的人民造成伤害,特别是在黑人和美洲原住民社区。为此,在本文中,我们采用了Brigitte Fielder的做法,其中包括使用以下惯例来表示特别有害的术语:n[-----]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Representing Race and Ethnicity in American Fiction, 1789-1920
Our project, which aims to reconstruct racial discourse in American literature, tracks three critical aspects of the representation of race and ethnicity in a corpus of over 18,000 American novels published between 1789 and 1920. First, we provide a historically sensitive account of the ethnicities that most occupied the nation’s racial imaginary, registering how different ethnic groups were perceived to be biologically, geographically, or socially linked. Second, we track the descriptive terms most associated with particular ethnicities over time as we trace the changing discursive fields surrounding particular racial groups. Finally, we explore the coherence of the discourse around each race and ethnicity represented across American literature before 1920, paying close attention to the ways in which various groups did or did not exist as semantically unified groups at specific historical moments. Taken together, our three questions show not just who was under discussion and how, but also the history—and historicity—of racialization and ethnic thinking writ large. Our goal in this paper is to identify and surface the racialized language of American Fiction and to face the harms that it caused without eliding its historical violence and force. At the same time, while we feel that confronting such racism is important work, we do not want to perpetuate the harm that this language, including many slurs, continues to cause to oppressed peoples, particularly in the Black and Native American communities. To that end, throughout this paper, we have adopted the practice of Brigitte Fielder, among others, in representing particularly harmful terms using the following convention: n[-----].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cultural Analytics
Journal of Cultural Analytics Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信