澳大利亚、英国和新加坡的“无遗嘱法”——人口老龄化对社会可持续性的又一帮助?

Q2 Social Sciences
Fiona R. Burns
{"title":"澳大利亚、英国和新加坡的“无遗嘱法”——人口老龄化对社会可持续性的又一帮助?","authors":"Fiona R. Burns","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2255245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intestacy law is an important area of property and succession law because some people do not make valid wills. The values and expectations of a society will generally influence the framing of intestacy rules. The intestacy schemes presently operating in Australia, England and Singapore are no exception. This article describes how the law in each of these jurisdictions has changed since the 19th century. It compares and contrasts the major elements of the intestacy schemes in Australia, England and Singapore. It is argued that in Australia and England an important priority is the protection of the economic well-being of the surviving spouse (broadly defined). In recent decades, law reformers in both jurisdictions have articulated an emerging priority for intestacy law: the enhancement of the economic well-being of the aged surviving spouse. Singapore’s statutory intestacy regime has remained stable since its implementation in 1967. It evidences the concern that not only the spouse, but also that in certain circumstances, lineal descendants and ascendants ought to inherit from the intestate. Therefore, the concept of immediate family not only includes the spouse, but the issue and parents of the intestate.","PeriodicalId":38330,"journal":{"name":"Singapore Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intestacy Law In Australia, England and Singapore - Another Aid to Social Sustainability in an Ageing Population?\",\"authors\":\"Fiona R. Burns\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2255245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Intestacy law is an important area of property and succession law because some people do not make valid wills. The values and expectations of a society will generally influence the framing of intestacy rules. The intestacy schemes presently operating in Australia, England and Singapore are no exception. This article describes how the law in each of these jurisdictions has changed since the 19th century. It compares and contrasts the major elements of the intestacy schemes in Australia, England and Singapore. It is argued that in Australia and England an important priority is the protection of the economic well-being of the surviving spouse (broadly defined). In recent decades, law reformers in both jurisdictions have articulated an emerging priority for intestacy law: the enhancement of the economic well-being of the aged surviving spouse. Singapore’s statutory intestacy regime has remained stable since its implementation in 1967. It evidences the concern that not only the spouse, but also that in certain circumstances, lineal descendants and ascendants ought to inherit from the intestate. Therefore, the concept of immediate family not only includes the spouse, but the issue and parents of the intestate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Singapore Journal of Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Singapore Journal of Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2255245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2255245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

无遗嘱法是财产法和继承法的一个重要领域,因为有些人没有订立有效遗嘱。一个社会的价值观和期望通常会影响遗嘱规则的制定。目前在澳大利亚、英国和新加坡实施的无遗嘱遗嘱计划也不例外。本文描述了自19世纪以来这些司法管辖区的法律是如何变化的。它比较和对比了澳大利亚、英国和新加坡遗嘱继承计划的主要元素。有人认为,在澳大利亚和英国,一个重要的优先事项是保护未亡配偶的经济福利(广义定义)。近几十年来,两个司法管辖区的法律改革者都明确提出了遗嘱法的一个新兴优先事项:提高未亡配偶的经济福利。新加坡的法定无遗嘱制度自1967年实施以来一直保持稳定。它证明了一种关切,即不仅是配偶,而且在某些情况下,直系后裔和祖先应该从无遗嘱人那里继承遗产。因此,直系亲属的概念不仅包括配偶,还包括无遗嘱人的问题和父母。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intestacy Law In Australia, England and Singapore - Another Aid to Social Sustainability in an Ageing Population?
Intestacy law is an important area of property and succession law because some people do not make valid wills. The values and expectations of a society will generally influence the framing of intestacy rules. The intestacy schemes presently operating in Australia, England and Singapore are no exception. This article describes how the law in each of these jurisdictions has changed since the 19th century. It compares and contrasts the major elements of the intestacy schemes in Australia, England and Singapore. It is argued that in Australia and England an important priority is the protection of the economic well-being of the surviving spouse (broadly defined). In recent decades, law reformers in both jurisdictions have articulated an emerging priority for intestacy law: the enhancement of the economic well-being of the aged surviving spouse. Singapore’s statutory intestacy regime has remained stable since its implementation in 1967. It evidences the concern that not only the spouse, but also that in certain circumstances, lineal descendants and ascendants ought to inherit from the intestate. Therefore, the concept of immediate family not only includes the spouse, but the issue and parents of the intestate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信