关于近似推测锁Elision

S. Karen Khatamifard;Ismail Akturk;Ulya R. Karpuzcu
{"title":"关于近似推测锁Elision","authors":"S. Karen Khatamifard;Ismail Akturk;Ulya R. Karpuzcu","doi":"10.1109/TMSCS.2017.2773488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Each synchronization point represents a point of serialization, and thereby can easily hurt parallel scalability. As demonstrated by recent studies, approximating, i.e., relaxing synchronization by eliminating a subset of synchronization points spatio-temporally can help improve parallel scalability, as long as approximation incurred violations of basic execution semantics remain predictable and controllable. Even if the divergence from fully-synchronized execution renders lower computation accuracy ratherthan catastrophic program termination, for approximation to be viable, the accuracy loss must be bounded. In this paper, we assess the viability of approximate synchronization using Speculative Lock Elision (SLE), which was adopted by hardware transactional memory implementations from industry, as a baseline for comparison. Specifically, we investigate the efficacy of exploiting semantic and temporal characteristics of critical sections in preventing excessive loss in computation accuracy, and devise a light-weight, proof-of-concept Approximate Speculative Lock Elision (ASLE) implementation, which exploits existing hardware support for SLE.","PeriodicalId":100643,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Multi-Scale Computing Systems","volume":"4 2","pages":"141-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/TMSCS.2017.2773488","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Approximate Speculative Lock Elision\",\"authors\":\"S. Karen Khatamifard;Ismail Akturk;Ulya R. Karpuzcu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TMSCS.2017.2773488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Each synchronization point represents a point of serialization, and thereby can easily hurt parallel scalability. As demonstrated by recent studies, approximating, i.e., relaxing synchronization by eliminating a subset of synchronization points spatio-temporally can help improve parallel scalability, as long as approximation incurred violations of basic execution semantics remain predictable and controllable. Even if the divergence from fully-synchronized execution renders lower computation accuracy ratherthan catastrophic program termination, for approximation to be viable, the accuracy loss must be bounded. In this paper, we assess the viability of approximate synchronization using Speculative Lock Elision (SLE), which was adopted by hardware transactional memory implementations from industry, as a baseline for comparison. Specifically, we investigate the efficacy of exploiting semantic and temporal characteristics of critical sections in preventing excessive loss in computation accuracy, and devise a light-weight, proof-of-concept Approximate Speculative Lock Elision (ASLE) implementation, which exploits existing hardware support for SLE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Multi-Scale Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"141-151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/TMSCS.2017.2773488\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Multi-Scale Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8114234/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Multi-Scale Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8114234/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

每个同步点代表一个序列化点,因此很容易损害并行可伸缩性。正如最近的研究所表明的那样,只要近似引起的对基本执行语义的违反保持可预测和可控,近似,即通过在时空上消除同步点的子集来放松同步,就有助于提高并行可扩展性。即使与灾难性程序终止相比,与完全同步执行的差异导致计算精度较低,为了使近似可行,精度损失必须是有界的。在本文中,我们使用推测锁Elision(SLE)来评估近似同步的可行性,该方法被业界的硬件事务存储器实现所采用,作为比较的基线。具体而言,我们研究了利用关键部分的语义和时间特征来防止计算精度过度损失的有效性,并设计了一种轻量级的概念验证近似推测锁Elision(ASLE)实现,该实现利用了对SLE的现有硬件支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Approximate Speculative Lock Elision
Each synchronization point represents a point of serialization, and thereby can easily hurt parallel scalability. As demonstrated by recent studies, approximating, i.e., relaxing synchronization by eliminating a subset of synchronization points spatio-temporally can help improve parallel scalability, as long as approximation incurred violations of basic execution semantics remain predictable and controllable. Even if the divergence from fully-synchronized execution renders lower computation accuracy ratherthan catastrophic program termination, for approximation to be viable, the accuracy loss must be bounded. In this paper, we assess the viability of approximate synchronization using Speculative Lock Elision (SLE), which was adopted by hardware transactional memory implementations from industry, as a baseline for comparison. Specifically, we investigate the efficacy of exploiting semantic and temporal characteristics of critical sections in preventing excessive loss in computation accuracy, and devise a light-weight, proof-of-concept Approximate Speculative Lock Elision (ASLE) implementation, which exploits existing hardware support for SLE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信