H.J.早期历史上拜物教与科学理性主义和种族的冲突。《石头故事》、《吉米·高尔兹》、《上帝》、《飞人》。

Goranka Petrović
{"title":"H.J.早期历史上拜物教与科学理性主义和种族的冲突。《石头故事》、《吉米·高尔兹》、《上帝》、《飞人》。","authors":"Goranka Petrović","doi":"10.18485/analiff.2021.33.2.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes three early stories by H. G. Wells: “A Story of the Stone Age”, “Jimmy Goggles the God”, and “The Flying Man”. The basic arguments of the paper are, firstly, that the three stories contain a conflict between two different worldviews – namely, fetishism (as being characteristic, in a synchronic sense, of tribally organized non-Europeans, and, in a diachronic sense, of the prehistoric ancestors of all modern-day nations) and scientific rationalism (as being characteristic solely of contemporary Europeans) – and, secondly, that the stories “Jimmy Goggles the God” and “The Flying Man” also implicitly contain Wells’s specific stance on the race issue. It is concluded that, with regard to the former question, the author presents the European, scientific and rationalistic worldview as triumphant, whereas in relation to the latter question, he presents himself as particularly tolerant and humane to the dark-skinned non-European races. Since the prevailing sociological and anthropological concepts of the nineteenth century were based on bourgeois, emphatically racist, unilinear sociocultural evolutionism, in the aforementioned stories Wells presents himself as a selective, critical mind that takes only the acceptance of global technologization and the enlightenment of non-European races, but rejects the affirmation of the racially based hierarchization of the world utopia from unilinear evolutionism. In interpreting these works, we do not solely rely on the texts of the analyzed stories, but also use intertextual relations between these stories and Wells’s later utopian and reformist opus.","PeriodicalId":34853,"journal":{"name":"Anali Filoloshkog fakulteta","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sukob između fetišizma i naučnog racionalizma i rasno pitanje u ranim pripovetkama H. Dž. Velsa: „Priča iz kamenog doba”, „Džimi Goglz — bog”, „Leteći čovek”\",\"authors\":\"Goranka Petrović\",\"doi\":\"10.18485/analiff.2021.33.2.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes three early stories by H. G. Wells: “A Story of the Stone Age”, “Jimmy Goggles the God”, and “The Flying Man”. The basic arguments of the paper are, firstly, that the three stories contain a conflict between two different worldviews – namely, fetishism (as being characteristic, in a synchronic sense, of tribally organized non-Europeans, and, in a diachronic sense, of the prehistoric ancestors of all modern-day nations) and scientific rationalism (as being characteristic solely of contemporary Europeans) – and, secondly, that the stories “Jimmy Goggles the God” and “The Flying Man” also implicitly contain Wells’s specific stance on the race issue. It is concluded that, with regard to the former question, the author presents the European, scientific and rationalistic worldview as triumphant, whereas in relation to the latter question, he presents himself as particularly tolerant and humane to the dark-skinned non-European races. Since the prevailing sociological and anthropological concepts of the nineteenth century were based on bourgeois, emphatically racist, unilinear sociocultural evolutionism, in the aforementioned stories Wells presents himself as a selective, critical mind that takes only the acceptance of global technologization and the enlightenment of non-European races, but rejects the affirmation of the racially based hierarchization of the world utopia from unilinear evolutionism. In interpreting these works, we do not solely rely on the texts of the analyzed stories, but also use intertextual relations between these stories and Wells’s later utopian and reformist opus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anali Filoloshkog fakulteta\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anali Filoloshkog fakulteta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18485/analiff.2021.33.2.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anali Filoloshkog fakulteta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18485/analiff.2021.33.2.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了h.g.威尔斯早期的三部小说:《石器时代的故事》、《吉米·沃格尔的上帝》和《飞人》。这篇论文的基本论点是,首先,这三个故事包含了两种不同世界观之间的冲突——即,拜物教(在共时意义上是部落组织的非欧洲人的特征,在历时意义上是所有现代国家的史前祖先的特征)和科学理性主义(仅仅是当代欧洲人的特征)——其次,《吉米护目镜》和《飞人》这两个故事也隐含了威尔斯在种族问题上的具体立场。结论是,关于前一个问题,作者把欧洲的、科学的和理性主义的世界观说成是胜利的,而关于后一个问题,他把自己说成是对深色皮肤的非欧洲种族特别宽容和人道的。由于19世纪流行的社会学和人类学概念是基于资产阶级的,强调种族主义的,单线的社会文化进化论,在上述故事中,威尔斯将自己呈现为一个选择性的,批判性的头脑,只接受全球技术和非欧洲种族的启蒙,但拒绝肯定基于种族的世界乌托邦等级制度,从单线进化论。在解读这些作品时,我们不能仅仅依靠所分析故事的文本,而是要利用这些故事与威尔斯后来的乌托邦和改良主义作品之间的互文关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sukob između fetišizma i naučnog racionalizma i rasno pitanje u ranim pripovetkama H. Dž. Velsa: „Priča iz kamenog doba”, „Džimi Goglz — bog”, „Leteći čovek”
This paper analyzes three early stories by H. G. Wells: “A Story of the Stone Age”, “Jimmy Goggles the God”, and “The Flying Man”. The basic arguments of the paper are, firstly, that the three stories contain a conflict between two different worldviews – namely, fetishism (as being characteristic, in a synchronic sense, of tribally organized non-Europeans, and, in a diachronic sense, of the prehistoric ancestors of all modern-day nations) and scientific rationalism (as being characteristic solely of contemporary Europeans) – and, secondly, that the stories “Jimmy Goggles the God” and “The Flying Man” also implicitly contain Wells’s specific stance on the race issue. It is concluded that, with regard to the former question, the author presents the European, scientific and rationalistic worldview as triumphant, whereas in relation to the latter question, he presents himself as particularly tolerant and humane to the dark-skinned non-European races. Since the prevailing sociological and anthropological concepts of the nineteenth century were based on bourgeois, emphatically racist, unilinear sociocultural evolutionism, in the aforementioned stories Wells presents himself as a selective, critical mind that takes only the acceptance of global technologization and the enlightenment of non-European races, but rejects the affirmation of the racially based hierarchization of the world utopia from unilinear evolutionism. In interpreting these works, we do not solely rely on the texts of the analyzed stories, but also use intertextual relations between these stories and Wells’s later utopian and reformist opus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信