物理化学生命维持系统向外太空飞行的初步多标准分析

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
N.S. Kudriavtseva, A.E. Sorokin
{"title":"物理化学生命维持系统向外太空飞行的初步多标准分析","authors":"N.S. Kudriavtseva, A.E. Sorokin","doi":"10.21687/0233-528x-2022-56-4-95-101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preliminary structural analysis of a physical-chemical life support system (LSS) was made for a 1000-day mission of 4 crew members from Earth's orbit to Mars orbit and back using the next 5 criteria: robustness, total equivalent mass, insertion mass and volume, and combined expenses on R&D and reliability testing. Analyzed were structures of 4 LSS designs including supply-relied, hybrid, semi-closed and two options of nearly closed LSS by the criterion of failure classifications: all failures are independent and common cause failures are probable. An adequate level of robustness must be first reached using an integral approach that is inclusion of supplies, finalizing the system design and production, and inherent cold redundancy of critical regeneration subsystems. This must be followed by informal analysis of alternative LSS designs with rational values of the other 4 Q-factors. It was concluded that simple, reliable and cheap supply-based LSS as well as hybrid LSS are uneconomic for exploration class missions, as their insertion masses exceed the acceptable level in 5 times and twice, respectively. Nearly closed LSS is also unacceptable for the reason of very high R&D costs. Therefore, we give preference to partly closed LSS, provided the requirement to increase the LSS specific weight from 0.15 to 0.28 is satisfied.","PeriodicalId":8683,"journal":{"name":"Aviakosmicheskaia i ekologicheskaia meditsina = Aerospace and environmental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ПРЕДВАРИТЕЛЬНЫЙ МНОГОКРИТЕРИАЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ СТРУКТУРЫ ФИЗИКО-ХИМИЧЕСКОЙ СИСТЕМЫ ЖИЗНЕОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЯ КОСМИЧЕСКОГО АППАРАТА ДЛЯ ПОЛЕТА В ДАЛЬНИЙ КОСМОС\",\"authors\":\"N.S. Kudriavtseva, A.E. Sorokin\",\"doi\":\"10.21687/0233-528x-2022-56-4-95-101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Preliminary structural analysis of a physical-chemical life support system (LSS) was made for a 1000-day mission of 4 crew members from Earth's orbit to Mars orbit and back using the next 5 criteria: robustness, total equivalent mass, insertion mass and volume, and combined expenses on R&D and reliability testing. Analyzed were structures of 4 LSS designs including supply-relied, hybrid, semi-closed and two options of nearly closed LSS by the criterion of failure classifications: all failures are independent and common cause failures are probable. An adequate level of robustness must be first reached using an integral approach that is inclusion of supplies, finalizing the system design and production, and inherent cold redundancy of critical regeneration subsystems. This must be followed by informal analysis of alternative LSS designs with rational values of the other 4 Q-factors. It was concluded that simple, reliable and cheap supply-based LSS as well as hybrid LSS are uneconomic for exploration class missions, as their insertion masses exceed the acceptable level in 5 times and twice, respectively. Nearly closed LSS is also unacceptable for the reason of very high R&D costs. Therefore, we give preference to partly closed LSS, provided the requirement to increase the LSS specific weight from 0.15 to 0.28 is satisfied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aviakosmicheskaia i ekologicheskaia meditsina = Aerospace and environmental medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aviakosmicheskaia i ekologicheskaia meditsina = Aerospace and environmental medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21687/0233-528x-2022-56-4-95-101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aviakosmicheskaia i ekologicheskaia meditsina = Aerospace and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21687/0233-528x-2022-56-4-95-101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对一个物理-化学生命维持系统(LSS)进行了初步的结构分析,该系统由4名宇航员组成,从地球轨道到火星轨道并返回,为期1000天,使用以下5个标准:稳健性、总等效质量、插入质量和体积,以及研发和可靠性测试的综合费用。根据故障分类标准:所有故障都是独立的,可能存在共因故障,分析了供应依赖型、混合型、半封闭式和近封闭式两种LSS设计方案的结构。首先必须采用包括供应、完成系统设计和生产以及关键再生子系统固有的冷冗余在内的综合方法来达到适当的稳健性水平。接下来必须对具有其他4个q因子的合理值的备选LSS设计进行非正式分析。结果表明,简单、可靠、廉价的供给型LSS和混合LSS的插入质量分别有5次和2次超过可接受水平,不符合勘探级任务的经济效益。近乎封闭的LSS也是不可接受的,因为研发成本非常高。因此,如果满足将LSS比重从0.15提高到0.28的要求,我们优先选择半封闭LSS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ПРЕДВАРИТЕЛЬНЫЙ МНОГОКРИТЕРИАЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ СТРУКТУРЫ ФИЗИКО-ХИМИЧЕСКОЙ СИСТЕМЫ ЖИЗНЕОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЯ КОСМИЧЕСКОГО АППАРАТА ДЛЯ ПОЛЕТА В ДАЛЬНИЙ КОСМОС
Preliminary structural analysis of a physical-chemical life support system (LSS) was made for a 1000-day mission of 4 crew members from Earth's orbit to Mars orbit and back using the next 5 criteria: robustness, total equivalent mass, insertion mass and volume, and combined expenses on R&D and reliability testing. Analyzed were structures of 4 LSS designs including supply-relied, hybrid, semi-closed and two options of nearly closed LSS by the criterion of failure classifications: all failures are independent and common cause failures are probable. An adequate level of robustness must be first reached using an integral approach that is inclusion of supplies, finalizing the system design and production, and inherent cold redundancy of critical regeneration subsystems. This must be followed by informal analysis of alternative LSS designs with rational values of the other 4 Q-factors. It was concluded that simple, reliable and cheap supply-based LSS as well as hybrid LSS are uneconomic for exploration class missions, as their insertion masses exceed the acceptable level in 5 times and twice, respectively. Nearly closed LSS is also unacceptable for the reason of very high R&D costs. Therefore, we give preference to partly closed LSS, provided the requirement to increase the LSS specific weight from 0.15 to 0.28 is satisfied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aviakosmicheskaia i ekologicheskaia meditsina = Aerospace and environmental medicine
Aviakosmicheskaia i ekologicheskaia meditsina = Aerospace and environmental medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信