奖励制度是尼日利亚提高员工生产力的一种策略

Sunday Abayomi Adebisi, A. Oladipo
{"title":"奖励制度是尼日利亚提高员工生产力的一种策略","authors":"Sunday Abayomi Adebisi, A. Oladipo","doi":"10.19177/REEN.V8E1201556-84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper appraises reward system as a strategy for increasing employees’ productivity. The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards on employees’ productivity were measured by collating primary data through the use of multistage, stratified and random sampling techniques to sample respondents in University of Lagos. 400 copies of the questionnaire were administered but only 280 copies were recovered for analyses. Regression analyses findings showed coefficient results of: (R 2 )(0.361; (R 2 )(0.271); (R) 2 (0.180) (for hypotheses 1,2, and 3 respectively) to be significant at 0.05 level. The correlation coefficient of 0.386 for hypothesis 4 tested at 99% confident limit, revealed work input and extra rewards to be positively correlated","PeriodicalId":41816,"journal":{"name":"Revista Eletronica de Estrategia e Negocios-REEN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sistema de recompensas como estratégia para melhorar a produtividade de colaboradores na Nigéria\",\"authors\":\"Sunday Abayomi Adebisi, A. Oladipo\",\"doi\":\"10.19177/REEN.V8E1201556-84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper appraises reward system as a strategy for increasing employees’ productivity. The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards on employees’ productivity were measured by collating primary data through the use of multistage, stratified and random sampling techniques to sample respondents in University of Lagos. 400 copies of the questionnaire were administered but only 280 copies were recovered for analyses. Regression analyses findings showed coefficient results of: (R 2 )(0.361; (R 2 )(0.271); (R) 2 (0.180) (for hypotheses 1,2, and 3 respectively) to be significant at 0.05 level. The correlation coefficient of 0.386 for hypothesis 4 tested at 99% confident limit, revealed work input and extra rewards to be positively correlated\",\"PeriodicalId\":41816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Eletronica de Estrategia e Negocios-REEN\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Eletronica de Estrategia e Negocios-REEN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19177/REEN.V8E1201556-84\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Eletronica de Estrategia e Negocios-REEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19177/REEN.V8E1201556-84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文将奖励制度作为一种提高员工生产力的策略进行了评价。通过使用多阶段,分层和随机抽样技术对拉各斯大学的样本受访者进行抽样,通过整理原始数据来衡量内在和外在奖励对员工生产力的影响。400份问卷被管理,但只有280份被回收用于分析。回归分析结果显示系数结果为:(r2)(0.361;(r 2)(0.271);(R) 2(0.180)(分别为假设1、2和3)在0.05水平上显著。假设4在99%置信限下的相关系数为0.386,表明工作投入与额外奖励呈正相关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sistema de recompensas como estratégia para melhorar a produtividade de colaboradores na Nigéria
This paper appraises reward system as a strategy for increasing employees’ productivity. The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards on employees’ productivity were measured by collating primary data through the use of multistage, stratified and random sampling techniques to sample respondents in University of Lagos. 400 copies of the questionnaire were administered but only 280 copies were recovered for analyses. Regression analyses findings showed coefficient results of: (R 2 )(0.361; (R 2 )(0.271); (R) 2 (0.180) (for hypotheses 1,2, and 3 respectively) to be significant at 0.05 level. The correlation coefficient of 0.386 for hypothesis 4 tested at 99% confident limit, revealed work input and extra rewards to be positively correlated
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信