{"title":"现代宪法思想不可思议的开端","authors":"L. Weinberg","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2125471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper notes an intellectual transformation occurring in relatively obscure cases in the New Deal Court. Among other things, these cases prefigure the advent of the tiered scrutiny characteristic of modern rights-based constitutional litigation. At a deeper level, they mark a revolution in constitutional analysis with resonance for our present structural understandings of national power, state power, and the workings of American federalism.","PeriodicalId":90761,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania journal of constitutional law","volume":"15 1","pages":"291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unlikely Beginnings of Modern Constitutional Thought\",\"authors\":\"L. Weinberg\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2125471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper notes an intellectual transformation occurring in relatively obscure cases in the New Deal Court. Among other things, these cases prefigure the advent of the tiered scrutiny characteristic of modern rights-based constitutional litigation. At a deeper level, they mark a revolution in constitutional analysis with resonance for our present structural understandings of national power, state power, and the workings of American federalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Pennsylvania journal of constitutional law\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Pennsylvania journal of constitutional law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2125471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania journal of constitutional law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2125471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unlikely Beginnings of Modern Constitutional Thought
This paper notes an intellectual transformation occurring in relatively obscure cases in the New Deal Court. Among other things, these cases prefigure the advent of the tiered scrutiny characteristic of modern rights-based constitutional litigation. At a deeper level, they mark a revolution in constitutional analysis with resonance for our present structural understandings of national power, state power, and the workings of American federalism.