{"title":"“幂零李群的Beurling定理”一文的勘误,大阪J.数学,48(2011),127—147","authors":"K. Smaoui","doi":"10.18910/58911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Here W is a suitable cross-section for the generic coadjoint orbit s in g , the vector space dual ofg. The condition (1.1) of this theorem depends on the choice of t he bases for which the norm of x in G is defined. We must define the norm of x in G before stating Theorem 1.3. For this we must fix a bases of g, and then define the norm of x using this bases. In addition, we shouldn’t modify this bases t hroughout the proof of Theorem 1.3. This implies that, Remark 2.5.1 in the paper is n ot correct.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Erratum to the article ``Beurling's theorem for nilpotent Lie groups'' Osaka J. Math. 48 (2011), 127--147\",\"authors\":\"K. Smaoui\",\"doi\":\"10.18910/58911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Here W is a suitable cross-section for the generic coadjoint orbit s in g , the vector space dual ofg. The condition (1.1) of this theorem depends on the choice of t he bases for which the norm of x in G is defined. We must define the norm of x in G before stating Theorem 1.3. For this we must fix a bases of g, and then define the norm of x using this bases. In addition, we shouldn’t modify this bases t hroughout the proof of Theorem 1.3. This implies that, Remark 2.5.1 in the paper is n ot correct.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18910/58911\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18910/58911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Erratum to the article ``Beurling's theorem for nilpotent Lie groups'' Osaka J. Math. 48 (2011), 127--147
Here W is a suitable cross-section for the generic coadjoint orbit s in g , the vector space dual ofg. The condition (1.1) of this theorem depends on the choice of t he bases for which the norm of x in G is defined. We must define the norm of x in G before stating Theorem 1.3. For this we must fix a bases of g, and then define the norm of x using this bases. In addition, we shouldn’t modify this bases t hroughout the proof of Theorem 1.3. This implies that, Remark 2.5.1 in the paper is n ot correct.