法律学者、经济学家与制度的跨学科研究

IF 2.5 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

Cornell Law Review Pub Date : 2011-02-01 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.1995502

Ron Harris

{"title":"法律学者、经济学家与制度的跨学科研究","authors":"Ron Harris","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1995502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Essay does not focus on legal theory in law schools, the common core of legal scholarship as practiced in law schools, nor the trend towards interdisciplinary research as reflected in the \"law and\" movements in law schools. Rather, it looks outside of law schools, law reviews, and internal legal discourse. It examines the role that legal scholars play in interdisciplinary debates on legal issues. Do they attend such debates, and if so, do these scholars offer a unique voice based on legal theory or on other tools or sensitivities provided by the legal discipline?","PeriodicalId":51518,"journal":{"name":"Cornell Law Review","volume":"96 1","pages":"789"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Scholars, Economists and the Interdisciplinary Study of Institutions\",\"authors\":\"Ron Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1995502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Essay does not focus on legal theory in law schools, the common core of legal scholarship as practiced in law schools, nor the trend towards interdisciplinary research as reflected in the \\\"law and\\\" movements in law schools. Rather, it looks outside of law schools, law reviews, and internal legal discourse. It examines the role that legal scholars play in interdisciplinary debates on legal issues. Do they attend such debates, and if so, do these scholars offer a unique voice based on legal theory or on other tools or sensitivities provided by the legal discipline?\",\"PeriodicalId\":51518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cornell Law Review\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"789\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cornell Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1995502\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornell Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1995502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

本文不关注法学院的法律理论，这是法学院实践的法律学术的共同核心，也不关注法学院“法律和”运动所反映的跨学科研究趋势。相反，它着眼于法学院、法律评论和内部法律论述之外。它考察了法律学者在法律问题的跨学科辩论中所起的作用。他们是否参加了这样的辩论，如果参加了，这些学者是否根据法律理论或法律学科提供的其他工具或敏感性提供了独特的声音?

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Legal Scholars, Economists and the Interdisciplinary Study of Institutions

This Essay does not focus on legal theory in law schools, the common core of legal scholarship as practiced in law schools, nor the trend towards interdisciplinary research as reflected in the "law and" movements in law schools. Rather, it looks outside of law schools, law reviews, and internal legal discourse. It examines the role that legal scholars play in interdisciplinary debates on legal issues. Do they attend such debates, and if so, do these scholars offer a unique voice based on legal theory or on other tools or sensitivities provided by the legal discipline?

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cornell Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

4.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Founded in 1915, the Cornell Law Review is a student-run and student-edited journal that strives to publish novel scholarship that will have an immediate and lasting impact on the legal community. The Cornell Law Review publishes six issues annually consisting of articles, essays, book reviews, and student notes.