货币与通货膨胀:失协整

IF 0.4 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS
A. Michl
{"title":"货币与通货膨胀:失协整","authors":"A. Michl","doi":"10.18267/j.polek.1255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a cointegration, we show that there is no long-term relationship between money in the economy M and real (and nominal) GDP and CPI (US data from 1959 to 2018). There is no empirical evidence to support the textbook claim that \"inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon\". Only when we shorten the time series to the period before the crisis (1959-2008), there is a cointegration between CPI and M2, but only at the 10% significance level and only according to one of two co-integration tests. The relationship that existed before the crisis either had to fall apart or change. There are three possible explanations: (1) The growth of M in low-inflation economies (CPI below 10% annually) is distributed more equally between CPI and real GDP than in the event of significant changes in M. (2) The falling velocity of money after the crisis of 2008/2009. (3) The last possibility is an increase in the adequacy problem of inflation - the CPI does not adequately reflect the economic definition of inflation.","PeriodicalId":44220,"journal":{"name":"Politicka Ekonomie","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Money and Inflation: Lost Cointegration\",\"authors\":\"A. Michl\",\"doi\":\"10.18267/j.polek.1255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using a cointegration, we show that there is no long-term relationship between money in the economy M and real (and nominal) GDP and CPI (US data from 1959 to 2018). There is no empirical evidence to support the textbook claim that \\\"inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon\\\". Only when we shorten the time series to the period before the crisis (1959-2008), there is a cointegration between CPI and M2, but only at the 10% significance level and only according to one of two co-integration tests. The relationship that existed before the crisis either had to fall apart or change. There are three possible explanations: (1) The growth of M in low-inflation economies (CPI below 10% annually) is distributed more equally between CPI and real GDP than in the event of significant changes in M. (2) The falling velocity of money after the crisis of 2008/2009. (3) The last possibility is an increase in the adequacy problem of inflation - the CPI does not adequately reflect the economic definition of inflation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politicka Ekonomie\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politicka Ekonomie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1255\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politicka Ekonomie","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

使用协整,我们表明经济M中的货币与实际(和名义)GDP和CPI(1959年至2018年的美国数据)之间没有长期关系。教科书上所说的“无论何时何地,通胀都是一种货币现象”,没有任何经验证据支持。只有当我们将时间序列缩短到危机前(1959-2008)时,CPI和M2之间才存在协整,但只有在10%的显著性水平上,并且只有根据两个协整检验中的一个。危机前存在的关系要么分崩离析,要么改变。有三种可能的解释:(1)低通胀经济体(年CPI低于10%)的M增长在CPI和实际GDP之间的分配比M发生重大变化时更均匀。(2)2008/2009年危机后货币流通速度下降。(3)最后一种可能性是通货膨胀充分性问题的增加——CPI没有充分反映通货膨胀的经济学定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Money and Inflation: Lost Cointegration
Using a cointegration, we show that there is no long-term relationship between money in the economy M and real (and nominal) GDP and CPI (US data from 1959 to 2018). There is no empirical evidence to support the textbook claim that "inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon". Only when we shorten the time series to the period before the crisis (1959-2008), there is a cointegration between CPI and M2, but only at the 10% significance level and only according to one of two co-integration tests. The relationship that existed before the crisis either had to fall apart or change. There are three possible explanations: (1) The growth of M in low-inflation economies (CPI below 10% annually) is distributed more equally between CPI and real GDP than in the event of significant changes in M. (2) The falling velocity of money after the crisis of 2008/2009. (3) The last possibility is an increase in the adequacy problem of inflation - the CPI does not adequately reflect the economic definition of inflation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politicka Ekonomie
Politicka Ekonomie Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信