阿亚尼斯要塞对铁器时代年表的贡献

A. Erdem, A. Batmaz
{"title":"阿亚尼斯要塞对铁器时代年表的贡献","authors":"A. Erdem, A. Batmaz","doi":"10.2143/ANES.45.0.2033164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals primarily with the chronological issues of the seventh century BC and post-Urartian period from the perspective ofAyanis Fortress. According to dendrocronological results, Ayanis Fortress was built between 677 and 673 BC. These dates seem reasonable when we consider the Shupria campaign of Assyrian king Esarhaddon in 673-72 BC, and the Ayanis temple inscription which mentions that Rusa deported people from the lands of Assur. Ayanis Fortress must have been collapsed before 653 BC. This view is supported by a text of Asurbanipal that mentions an Urartian King 'Rusa', possibly Rusa III, relating to his conquest ofElam in 653 BC. After the collapse ofAyanis Fortress the local inhabitants continued to live in the Outher Town since Triangle Ware, a new element, was found together with the Urartian ceramics. Thus, it is reasonable to suggest that the local people ofAyanis did not abandon the area, but rather co-habitated with immigrants.","PeriodicalId":80328,"journal":{"name":"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne","volume":"45 1","pages":"65-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/ANES.45.0.2033164","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contributions of the Ayanis Fortress to Iron Age Chronology\",\"authors\":\"A. Erdem, A. Batmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/ANES.45.0.2033164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals primarily with the chronological issues of the seventh century BC and post-Urartian period from the perspective ofAyanis Fortress. According to dendrocronological results, Ayanis Fortress was built between 677 and 673 BC. These dates seem reasonable when we consider the Shupria campaign of Assyrian king Esarhaddon in 673-72 BC, and the Ayanis temple inscription which mentions that Rusa deported people from the lands of Assur. Ayanis Fortress must have been collapsed before 653 BC. This view is supported by a text of Asurbanipal that mentions an Urartian King 'Rusa', possibly Rusa III, relating to his conquest ofElam in 653 BC. After the collapse ofAyanis Fortress the local inhabitants continued to live in the Outher Town since Triangle Ware, a new element, was found together with the Urartian ceramics. Thus, it is reasonable to suggest that the local people ofAyanis did not abandon the area, but rather co-habitated with immigrants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"65-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/ANES.45.0.2033164\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/ANES.45.0.2033164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ANES.45.0.2033164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文主要从阿亚尼斯要塞的角度探讨公元前7世纪和后乌拉提亚时期的时间问题。根据树木年代学的结果,阿亚尼斯要塞建于公元前677年至公元前673年之间。当我们考虑到公元前673-72年亚述国王以撒哈顿的舒普利亚战役时,这些日期似乎是合理的,而阿亚尼斯神庙的铭文提到了鲁沙从亚述土地上驱逐人民。阿亚尼斯要塞一定是在公元前653年之前倒塌的。Asurbanipal的一篇文章支持了这一观点,文中提到了一位乌拉提亚国王Rusa,可能是Rusa三世,他在公元前653年征服了埃兰。在阿亚尼斯堡垒倒塌后,当地居民继续住在另一个城镇,因为三角陶器,一种新的元素,与乌拉提亚陶瓷一起被发现。因此,我们有理由认为,当地的阿亚尼斯人并没有放弃这一地区,而是与移民共同居住。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contributions of the Ayanis Fortress to Iron Age Chronology
This paper deals primarily with the chronological issues of the seventh century BC and post-Urartian period from the perspective ofAyanis Fortress. According to dendrocronological results, Ayanis Fortress was built between 677 and 673 BC. These dates seem reasonable when we consider the Shupria campaign of Assyrian king Esarhaddon in 673-72 BC, and the Ayanis temple inscription which mentions that Rusa deported people from the lands of Assur. Ayanis Fortress must have been collapsed before 653 BC. This view is supported by a text of Asurbanipal that mentions an Urartian King 'Rusa', possibly Rusa III, relating to his conquest ofElam in 653 BC. After the collapse ofAyanis Fortress the local inhabitants continued to live in the Outher Town since Triangle Ware, a new element, was found together with the Urartian ceramics. Thus, it is reasonable to suggest that the local people ofAyanis did not abandon the area, but rather co-habitated with immigrants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信