2006年《商标淡化修改法》提出了奢侈主张和模仿豁免

D. Gerhardt
{"title":"2006年《商标淡化修改法》提出了奢侈主张和模仿豁免","authors":"D. Gerhardt","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1932337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2006, Congress changed federal trademark dilution law when it enacted the Trademark Dilution Revision Act (““TDRA””). This Article first outlines the history of the dilution doctrine in the United States so that the changes enacted through the TDRA may be understood contextually. The TDRA’’s new provisions are then delineated and explained. The author argues that the TDRA narrows the scope of federal dilution protection. Although the TDRA lowered the burden of proof to a ““likelihood of dilution”” standard, the Act’’s new definition of fame creates a high bar that will exclude many marks from qualifying for federal dilution protection. Finally, through a case study, the Article illustrates how the TDRA’’s parody exemption will work as a defense against dilution by blurring and dilution by tarnishment claims.","PeriodicalId":90661,"journal":{"name":"North Carolina journal of law & technology","volume":"8 1","pages":"205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 2006 Trademark Dilution Revision Act Rolls Out a Luxury Claim and a Parody Exemption\",\"authors\":\"D. Gerhardt\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1932337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2006, Congress changed federal trademark dilution law when it enacted the Trademark Dilution Revision Act (““TDRA””). This Article first outlines the history of the dilution doctrine in the United States so that the changes enacted through the TDRA may be understood contextually. The TDRA’’s new provisions are then delineated and explained. The author argues that the TDRA narrows the scope of federal dilution protection. Although the TDRA lowered the burden of proof to a ““likelihood of dilution”” standard, the Act’’s new definition of fame creates a high bar that will exclude many marks from qualifying for federal dilution protection. Finally, through a case study, the Article illustrates how the TDRA’’s parody exemption will work as a defense against dilution by blurring and dilution by tarnishment claims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North Carolina journal of law & technology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North Carolina journal of law & technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1932337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North Carolina journal of law & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1932337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2006年,国会修改了联邦商标稀释法,颁布了《商标稀释修订法案》(“TDRA”)。本文首先概述了稀释原则在美国的历史,以便通过TDRA制定的变化可以在背景下理解。然后对TDRA的新规定进行了描述和解释。作者认为,TDRA缩小了联邦稀释保护的范围。尽管《商标法》将举证责任降低到“稀释可能性”标准,但该法对名声的新定义设置了一个很高的门槛,将许多商标排除在联邦稀释保护的资格之外。最后,通过案例分析,本文阐述了TDRA的恶搞豁免将如何作为一种防御,以防止模糊化和玷污索赔的稀释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The 2006 Trademark Dilution Revision Act Rolls Out a Luxury Claim and a Parody Exemption
In 2006, Congress changed federal trademark dilution law when it enacted the Trademark Dilution Revision Act (““TDRA””). This Article first outlines the history of the dilution doctrine in the United States so that the changes enacted through the TDRA may be understood contextually. The TDRA’’s new provisions are then delineated and explained. The author argues that the TDRA narrows the scope of federal dilution protection. Although the TDRA lowered the burden of proof to a ““likelihood of dilution”” standard, the Act’’s new definition of fame creates a high bar that will exclude many marks from qualifying for federal dilution protection. Finally, through a case study, the Article illustrates how the TDRA’’s parody exemption will work as a defense against dilution by blurring and dilution by tarnishment claims.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信