过渡时期司法和地方所有权:保护人权的框架

A. Friedman
{"title":"过渡时期司法和地方所有权:保护人权的框架","authors":"A. Friedman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1919874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of modern transitional justice goes back to the Nuremberg Trials after World War II. Since these trials many different mechanisms have been attempted, including traditional trials, conditional amnesties and other trial like entities. Since post-genocide Rwanda attempted to incorporate a traditional dispute resolution mechanism into post-genocide reconstruction, there has been much interest in the incorporation of local tradition and norms into the transitional justice process. This type of local ownership has many advantages, but also, in the case of Rwanda, presented the problem of its general incompatibility with international fair trials norms. This paper represents an attempt to consolidate the two, creating a framework by which local traditions and norms can be inserted into transitional justice mechanisms while still respecting internationally recognized fair trial rights.","PeriodicalId":80399,"journal":{"name":"Akron law review","volume":"46 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transitional Justice and Local Ownership: A Framework for the Protection of Human Rights\",\"authors\":\"A. Friedman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1919874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study of modern transitional justice goes back to the Nuremberg Trials after World War II. Since these trials many different mechanisms have been attempted, including traditional trials, conditional amnesties and other trial like entities. Since post-genocide Rwanda attempted to incorporate a traditional dispute resolution mechanism into post-genocide reconstruction, there has been much interest in the incorporation of local tradition and norms into the transitional justice process. This type of local ownership has many advantages, but also, in the case of Rwanda, presented the problem of its general incompatibility with international fair trials norms. This paper represents an attempt to consolidate the two, creating a framework by which local traditions and norms can be inserted into transitional justice mechanisms while still respecting internationally recognized fair trial rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Akron law review\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Akron law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1919874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akron law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1919874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

现代过渡司法的研究可以追溯到二战后的纽伦堡审判。自这些审判以来,已经尝试了许多不同的机制,包括传统审判、有条件大赦和其他类似审判的实体。由于种族灭绝后的卢旺达试图将传统的争端解决机制纳入种族灭绝后的重建,因此人们对将当地传统和规范纳入过渡时期司法进程非常感兴趣。这种地方所有权有许多优点,但在卢旺达的情况下,也产生了一般不符合国际公平审判准则的问题。本文试图巩固这两者,创建一个框架,使地方传统和规范可以插入过渡时期司法机制,同时仍然尊重国际公认的公平审判权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transitional Justice and Local Ownership: A Framework for the Protection of Human Rights
The study of modern transitional justice goes back to the Nuremberg Trials after World War II. Since these trials many different mechanisms have been attempted, including traditional trials, conditional amnesties and other trial like entities. Since post-genocide Rwanda attempted to incorporate a traditional dispute resolution mechanism into post-genocide reconstruction, there has been much interest in the incorporation of local tradition and norms into the transitional justice process. This type of local ownership has many advantages, but also, in the case of Rwanda, presented the problem of its general incompatibility with international fair trials norms. This paper represents an attempt to consolidate the two, creating a framework by which local traditions and norms can be inserted into transitional justice mechanisms while still respecting internationally recognized fair trial rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信