平等待遇不是既定的

E. Volokh
{"title":"平等待遇不是既定的","authors":"E. Volokh","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.191268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Does the Constitution require discrimination against religious schools and against parents who choose them? This question is the heart of the Establishment Clause debate over school choice. May the government treat government-run schools, secular private schools, and religious schools equally, supporting children's education regardless of the religiosity of the school to which the children go? Or must the government exclude religious schools from this generally available benefit? Casting the matter in terms of discrimination frames the issue in a stark light, but such a characterization is accurate: Discrimination is indeed what it's all about. Fair-minded people may argue that the Constitution does require such discrimination; not all discrimination is bad. But there should be no denying that a constitutional rule excluding religious schools from generally available benefits rests on the theory that discrimination is constitutionally mandated.","PeriodicalId":82192,"journal":{"name":"Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy","volume":"13 1","pages":"341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equal Treatment is Not Establishment\",\"authors\":\"E. Volokh\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.191268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Does the Constitution require discrimination against religious schools and against parents who choose them? This question is the heart of the Establishment Clause debate over school choice. May the government treat government-run schools, secular private schools, and religious schools equally, supporting children's education regardless of the religiosity of the school to which the children go? Or must the government exclude religious schools from this generally available benefit? Casting the matter in terms of discrimination frames the issue in a stark light, but such a characterization is accurate: Discrimination is indeed what it's all about. Fair-minded people may argue that the Constitution does require such discrimination; not all discrimination is bad. But there should be no denying that a constitutional rule excluding religious schools from generally available benefits rests on the theory that discrimination is constitutionally mandated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.191268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.191268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宪法要求歧视宗教学校和选择宗教学校的家长吗?这个问题是关于学校选择的政教分离条款争论的核心。政府是否可以平等对待公立学校、世俗私立学校和宗教学校,支持孩子们的教育,而不管孩子们上的是什么宗教学校?还是政府必须将宗教学校排除在这项普遍享有的福利之外?从歧视的角度来看待这个问题,是一个鲜明的问题,但这样的描述是准确的:歧视确实是它的全部。公正的人可能会争辩说,宪法确实要求这样的歧视;并非所有歧视都是坏事。但不可否认的是,宪法规定将宗教学校排除在普遍可获得的福利之外,这是基于宪法规定歧视的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Equal Treatment is Not Establishment
Does the Constitution require discrimination against religious schools and against parents who choose them? This question is the heart of the Establishment Clause debate over school choice. May the government treat government-run schools, secular private schools, and religious schools equally, supporting children's education regardless of the religiosity of the school to which the children go? Or must the government exclude religious schools from this generally available benefit? Casting the matter in terms of discrimination frames the issue in a stark light, but such a characterization is accurate: Discrimination is indeed what it's all about. Fair-minded people may argue that the Constitution does require such discrimination; not all discrimination is bad. But there should be no denying that a constitutional rule excluding religious schools from generally available benefits rests on the theory that discrimination is constitutionally mandated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信