风险:研究国家和生产Belén-Iquitos社区的情况,秘鲁

IF 0.3 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
Sharon Gorenstein
{"title":"风险:研究国家和生产Belén-Iquitos社区的情况,秘鲁","authors":"Sharon Gorenstein","doi":"10.18800/debatesensociologia.201801.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developmental policies, or development projects in general, have consistently failed to achieve their stated objectives by being based on a «construction» of the country/community/space that bears little relation to local culture. While development projects fail, the government succeeds in expanding the field of bureaucratic state power in the space that needs to be «developed». Seen from a notion of governmentality, socially legitimated authorities interfere in spaces isolated from the actual development by focusing on adjudicating the vices or virtues of developmental policies and their risks or lack thereof. In this way, risk works as a calculative rationally associated with welfare as a way of representing events, such as flooding, so they can be made governable. By focusing on the contrast between the risk perceptions of the state and river communities in the district of Belen, I attempt to contribute to recent debates about government risk assessment as the reorganization and simplification of nature to suit developers’ and public and private institutions’ goals. I analyze and identify three different dimensions of risk understanding: view of the river; notions of development; and belenino identity.","PeriodicalId":53932,"journal":{"name":"Debates en Sociologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estado y producción de riesgo: estudio de caso de las comunidades ribereñas de Belén-Iquitos, Perú\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Gorenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.18800/debatesensociologia.201801.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Developmental policies, or development projects in general, have consistently failed to achieve their stated objectives by being based on a «construction» of the country/community/space that bears little relation to local culture. While development projects fail, the government succeeds in expanding the field of bureaucratic state power in the space that needs to be «developed». Seen from a notion of governmentality, socially legitimated authorities interfere in spaces isolated from the actual development by focusing on adjudicating the vices or virtues of developmental policies and their risks or lack thereof. In this way, risk works as a calculative rationally associated with welfare as a way of representing events, such as flooding, so they can be made governable. By focusing on the contrast between the risk perceptions of the state and river communities in the district of Belen, I attempt to contribute to recent debates about government risk assessment as the reorganization and simplification of nature to suit developers’ and public and private institutions’ goals. I analyze and identify three different dimensions of risk understanding: view of the river; notions of development; and belenino identity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Debates en Sociologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Debates en Sociologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18800/debatesensociologia.201801.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Debates en Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/debatesensociologia.201801.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

总体而言,发展政策或发展计划一直未能实现其既定目标,因为它们基于对国家/社区/空间的“建构”,与当地文化关系不大。虽然发展项目失败了,但政府成功地在需要“发展”的空间中扩大了官僚国家权力的领域。从治理的概念来看,社会上合法的当局通过评判发展政策的好坏及其风险或缺乏来干预与实际发展隔离的空间。通过这种方式,风险作为一种计算理性与福利相关联,作为一种表示事件(如洪水)的方式,因此它们可以被治理。通过关注贝伦地区国家和河流社区风险认知的对比,我试图为最近关于政府风险评估的辩论做出贡献,即重组和简化自然,以适应开发商和公共和私人机构的目标。我分析并确定了风险理解的三个不同维度:对河流的看法;发展理念;还有贝莱尼诺的身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estado y producción de riesgo: estudio de caso de las comunidades ribereñas de Belén-Iquitos, Perú
Developmental policies, or development projects in general, have consistently failed to achieve their stated objectives by being based on a «construction» of the country/community/space that bears little relation to local culture. While development projects fail, the government succeeds in expanding the field of bureaucratic state power in the space that needs to be «developed». Seen from a notion of governmentality, socially legitimated authorities interfere in spaces isolated from the actual development by focusing on adjudicating the vices or virtues of developmental policies and their risks or lack thereof. In this way, risk works as a calculative rationally associated with welfare as a way of representing events, such as flooding, so they can be made governable. By focusing on the contrast between the risk perceptions of the state and river communities in the district of Belen, I attempt to contribute to recent debates about government risk assessment as the reorganization and simplification of nature to suit developers’ and public and private institutions’ goals. I analyze and identify three different dimensions of risk understanding: view of the river; notions of development; and belenino identity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信