印尼网络公证的监管理念

Shinta Pangesti, G. I. Darmawan, Cynthia P. Limantara
{"title":"印尼网络公证的监管理念","authors":"Shinta Pangesti, G. I. Darmawan, Cynthia P. Limantara","doi":"10.21070/JIHR.2020.7.701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Notary has the authority to certify the electronic transaction (cyber notary) according to the Elucidation of Article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 2 of 2014 (Law 2/2014). Thus, the authority has been the milestone for the concept of cyber notary in Indonesia. Although the enactment of Law 2/2014 presented a new concept in Notary in Indonesia, but it does not give a wide chance to the application of cyber notary itself. One of the roots that causes the obstacles are the absence of definite law in regulating cyber notary. Law 2/2014 mentioned cyber notary but did not give a normative definition on it. Therefore, the concept of cyber notary is limited to conduct the certification of electronic transaction. Several challenges on performing the authorities and obligations of notary could be found in the context of the implementation of cyber notary, as follows: 1) Notary is bounded to the form and procedure in drawing up authentic deeds set by Article 38 Law 2/2014; 2 ) The appearers shall be known to Notary or introduced to him/her; 3 ) Reading and signing of deeds have to done in specific procedure; and 4) Drawing up deeds in the form of Minutes of Deed and keep the same as a part of Notarial Protocols. This article was classified as legal normative research and meant to analyze the concept of regulation on cyber notary in Indonesia by using statute and conceptual approach.","PeriodicalId":31020,"journal":{"name":"Rechtsidee","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Regulatory Concept of Cyber Notary in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Shinta Pangesti, G. I. Darmawan, Cynthia P. Limantara\",\"doi\":\"10.21070/JIHR.2020.7.701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Notary has the authority to certify the electronic transaction (cyber notary) according to the Elucidation of Article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 2 of 2014 (Law 2/2014). Thus, the authority has been the milestone for the concept of cyber notary in Indonesia. Although the enactment of Law 2/2014 presented a new concept in Notary in Indonesia, but it does not give a wide chance to the application of cyber notary itself. One of the roots that causes the obstacles are the absence of definite law in regulating cyber notary. Law 2/2014 mentioned cyber notary but did not give a normative definition on it. Therefore, the concept of cyber notary is limited to conduct the certification of electronic transaction. Several challenges on performing the authorities and obligations of notary could be found in the context of the implementation of cyber notary, as follows: 1) Notary is bounded to the form and procedure in drawing up authentic deeds set by Article 38 Law 2/2014; 2 ) The appearers shall be known to Notary or introduced to him/her; 3 ) Reading and signing of deeds have to done in specific procedure; and 4) Drawing up deeds in the form of Minutes of Deed and keep the same as a part of Notarial Protocols. This article was classified as legal normative research and meant to analyze the concept of regulation on cyber notary in Indonesia by using statute and conceptual approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rechtsidee\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rechtsidee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21070/JIHR.2020.7.701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rechtsidee","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21070/JIHR.2020.7.701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

公证人有权根据2014年第2号法律(第2/2014号法律)第15条第(3)款的说明证明电子交易(网络公证人)。因此,该机构已成为印度尼西亚网络公证概念的里程碑。虽然第2/2014号法律的颁布在印度尼西亚提出了一个新的公证概念,但它并没有给网络公证本身的应用提供广泛的机会。造成网络公证障碍的根源之一是网络公证缺乏明确的法律规范。第2/2014号法律提到了网络公证,但没有给出规范的定义。因此,网络公证的概念仅限于对电子交易进行认证。在实施网络公证的背景下,可以发现在履行公证的权力和义务方面存在以下几个挑战:1)公证受限于第2/2014号法律第38条规定的制作真实契约的形式和程序;2)公证员应当认识或介绍给公证员;3)契约的阅读和签署必须按照特定的程序进行;4)以《契约纪要》的形式订立契约,并作为《公证协议》的一部分保存。本文将其归类为法律规范研究,旨在从法规和概念的角度对印尼网络公证的监管概念进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Regulatory Concept of Cyber Notary in Indonesia
Notary has the authority to certify the electronic transaction (cyber notary) according to the Elucidation of Article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 2 of 2014 (Law 2/2014). Thus, the authority has been the milestone for the concept of cyber notary in Indonesia. Although the enactment of Law 2/2014 presented a new concept in Notary in Indonesia, but it does not give a wide chance to the application of cyber notary itself. One of the roots that causes the obstacles are the absence of definite law in regulating cyber notary. Law 2/2014 mentioned cyber notary but did not give a normative definition on it. Therefore, the concept of cyber notary is limited to conduct the certification of electronic transaction. Several challenges on performing the authorities and obligations of notary could be found in the context of the implementation of cyber notary, as follows: 1) Notary is bounded to the form and procedure in drawing up authentic deeds set by Article 38 Law 2/2014; 2 ) The appearers shall be known to Notary or introduced to him/her; 3 ) Reading and signing of deeds have to done in specific procedure; and 4) Drawing up deeds in the form of Minutes of Deed and keep the same as a part of Notarial Protocols. This article was classified as legal normative research and meant to analyze the concept of regulation on cyber notary in Indonesia by using statute and conceptual approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信