腱鞘切口用于扳机指的手术治疗。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-01-04 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00041
Muhammad Ali Elahi, Jordan R Pollock, M Lane Moore, Jack M Haglin, Cara Lai, Nathaniel B Hinckley, Kevin J Renfree
{"title":"腱鞘切口用于扳机指的手术治疗。","authors":"Muhammad Ali Elahi, Jordan R Pollock, M Lane Moore, Jack M Haglin, Cara Lai, Nathaniel B Hinckley, Kevin J Renfree","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open trigger finger release is an elective surgical procedure that serves as the gold standard treatment for trigger digits. The aim of this procedure is to release the A1 pulley in a setting in which the pulley is completely visible, ultimately allowing the flexor tendons that were previously impinged on to glide more easily through the tendon sheath. Although A1-or the first annular pulley-is the site of triggering in nearly all cases, alternative sites include A2, A3, and the palmar aponeurosis<sup>1</sup>.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>Typically, the surgical procedure can be conducted in an outpatient setting and can vary in duration from a few minutes to half an hour. The surgical procedure involves the patient lying in the supine position with the operative hand positioned to the side. A small incision, ranging from 1 to 1.5 cm, is made on the volar side of the hand, just proximal to the A1 pulley in the skin crease in order to minimize scarring. Once the underlying neurovascular structures are exposed, the A1 pulley is released longitudinally at least to the level of the A2 pulley, followed by decompression of the flexor tendons that were previously impinged on. In order to confirm the release, the patient is asked to flex and extend the affected finger. The wound is irrigated and closed once the release is confirmed by both the patient and surgeon.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Aside from an open release, trigger finger can be treated nonoperatively with use of splinting and corticosteroid injection. Alternative operative treatments include a percutaneous release, which involves the use of a needle to release the A1 pulley<sup>2</sup>. Trigger finger can initially be treated nonoperatively. If unsuccessful, surgical intervention is considered the ultimate remedy<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Because of their efficacious nature, corticosteroid injections are indicated preoperatively, particularly in non-diabetic patients<sup>3</sup>. Splinting is often an appropriate treatment option in patients who wish to avoid a corticosteroid injection<sup>1</sup>. However, if nonoperative treatment modalities fail to resolve pain and symptoms, surgical intervention is indicated<sup>2</sup>. In comparison with a percutaneous trigger finger release, an open release provides enhanced exposure and may be safer with respect to avoiding iatrogenic neurovascular injury<sup>2</sup>. However, in a randomized controlled trial, Gilberts et al. found no difference in the rates of recurrence when comparing open versus percutaneous trigger finger release<sup>4</sup>.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>With reported success rates ranging from 90% to 100%, the open release of the A1 pulley is considered a common procedure associated with minimal complications<sup>2</sup>. Complications of the procedure were assessed in a retrospective analysis of 43 patients who underwent 78 open trigger releases performed by 1 surgeon. In that study, the authors reported a minor complication rate of 28% and a major complication rate of 3%<sup>5</sup>. Specifically, the 2 major complications noted by the authors were a synovial fistula and a proximal interphalangeal joint arthrofibrosis. In a larger study that included 543 patients who underwent 795 open trigger releases, the authors reported a minor complication rate of 9.6% and major complication rate of 2.4%<sup>6</sup>. Furthermore, the most common complications involved persistent stiffness, swelling, or pain. In that analysis, the authors suggested that sedation, male gender, and general anesthesia may be associated with greater risk<sup>6</sup>.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>At the discretion of the surgeon, a longitudinal, transverse, or oblique incision is made directly on top of the tendon at the level of the metacarpophalangeal joint, which is the preferred incision site because it provides maximal accessibility to the A1 pulley.Local anesthesia is preferred because it allows the patient and surgeon to confirm the release immediately.If conducting an open trigger release on the thumb, the surgeon should identify and protect the radial digital nerve, which courses directly over the A1 pulley.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>MCP = metacarpophalangeal.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10807900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tendon Sheath Incision for Surgical Treatment of Trigger Finger.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Ali Elahi, Jordan R Pollock, M Lane Moore, Jack M Haglin, Cara Lai, Nathaniel B Hinckley, Kevin J Renfree\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open trigger finger release is an elective surgical procedure that serves as the gold standard treatment for trigger digits. The aim of this procedure is to release the A1 pulley in a setting in which the pulley is completely visible, ultimately allowing the flexor tendons that were previously impinged on to glide more easily through the tendon sheath. Although A1-or the first annular pulley-is the site of triggering in nearly all cases, alternative sites include A2, A3, and the palmar aponeurosis<sup>1</sup>.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>Typically, the surgical procedure can be conducted in an outpatient setting and can vary in duration from a few minutes to half an hour. The surgical procedure involves the patient lying in the supine position with the operative hand positioned to the side. A small incision, ranging from 1 to 1.5 cm, is made on the volar side of the hand, just proximal to the A1 pulley in the skin crease in order to minimize scarring. Once the underlying neurovascular structures are exposed, the A1 pulley is released longitudinally at least to the level of the A2 pulley, followed by decompression of the flexor tendons that were previously impinged on. In order to confirm the release, the patient is asked to flex and extend the affected finger. The wound is irrigated and closed once the release is confirmed by both the patient and surgeon.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Aside from an open release, trigger finger can be treated nonoperatively with use of splinting and corticosteroid injection. Alternative operative treatments include a percutaneous release, which involves the use of a needle to release the A1 pulley<sup>2</sup>. Trigger finger can initially be treated nonoperatively. If unsuccessful, surgical intervention is considered the ultimate remedy<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Because of their efficacious nature, corticosteroid injections are indicated preoperatively, particularly in non-diabetic patients<sup>3</sup>. Splinting is often an appropriate treatment option in patients who wish to avoid a corticosteroid injection<sup>1</sup>. However, if nonoperative treatment modalities fail to resolve pain and symptoms, surgical intervention is indicated<sup>2</sup>. In comparison with a percutaneous trigger finger release, an open release provides enhanced exposure and may be safer with respect to avoiding iatrogenic neurovascular injury<sup>2</sup>. However, in a randomized controlled trial, Gilberts et al. found no difference in the rates of recurrence when comparing open versus percutaneous trigger finger release<sup>4</sup>.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>With reported success rates ranging from 90% to 100%, the open release of the A1 pulley is considered a common procedure associated with minimal complications<sup>2</sup>. Complications of the procedure were assessed in a retrospective analysis of 43 patients who underwent 78 open trigger releases performed by 1 surgeon. In that study, the authors reported a minor complication rate of 28% and a major complication rate of 3%<sup>5</sup>. Specifically, the 2 major complications noted by the authors were a synovial fistula and a proximal interphalangeal joint arthrofibrosis. In a larger study that included 543 patients who underwent 795 open trigger releases, the authors reported a minor complication rate of 9.6% and major complication rate of 2.4%<sup>6</sup>. Furthermore, the most common complications involved persistent stiffness, swelling, or pain. In that analysis, the authors suggested that sedation, male gender, and general anesthesia may be associated with greater risk<sup>6</sup>.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>At the discretion of the surgeon, a longitudinal, transverse, or oblique incision is made directly on top of the tendon at the level of the metacarpophalangeal joint, which is the preferred incision site because it provides maximal accessibility to the A1 pulley.Local anesthesia is preferred because it allows the patient and surgeon to confirm the release immediately.If conducting an open trigger release on the thumb, the surgeon should identify and protect the radial digital nerve, which courses directly over the A1 pulley.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>MCP = metacarpophalangeal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10807900/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00041\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:开放性扳机指松解术是一种选择性外科手术,是治疗扳机指的金标准。该手术的目的是在完全显露 A1 滑轮的情况下松解 A1 滑轮,最终使之前受到冲击的屈肌腱更容易滑过腱鞘。虽然几乎所有病例中触发的部位都是 A1 滑轮或第一个环状滑轮,但其他部位包括 A2、A3 和掌腱膜1:通常情况下,手术可在门诊进行,持续时间从几分钟到半小时不等。手术过程中,患者取仰卧位,将手术手置于体侧。为了尽量减少疤痕,在手的外侧、A1 滑轮近端皮肤皱褶处做一个 1 至 1.5 厘米的小切口。暴露底层神经血管结构后,纵向松解 A1 滑轮,至少到 A2 滑轮的水平,然后对之前受压的屈肌腱进行减压。为了确认松解情况,要求患者屈伸患指。患者和外科医生确认松解后,冲洗伤口并缝合:除了开放性松解,扳机指还可以通过夹板和注射皮质类固醇进行非手术治疗。其他手术疗法包括经皮松解术,即使用针头松解 A1 滑轮2。扳机指最初可采用非手术治疗。理由:皮质类固醇注射具有良好的疗效,因此适用于术前治疗,尤其是非糖尿病患者3。对于希望避免注射皮质类固醇的患者,夹板固定通常是一种合适的治疗方法1。但是,如果非手术治疗方法无法解决疼痛和症状,则需要进行手术治疗2。与经皮扳机指松解术相比,开放性松解术可提供更多的暴露机会,在避免先天性神经血管损伤方面可能更安全2。然而,在一项随机对照试验中,Gilberts 等人发现开放式扳机指松解术与经皮扳机指松解术的复发率没有差异4:预期结果:据报道,开放式 A1 滑轮松解术的成功率在 90% 到 100% 之间,是一种并发症极少的常见手术2。一项回顾性分析对 43 名患者进行了评估,这些患者接受了由一名外科医生实施的 78 例开放式扳机指松解术。在该研究中,作者报告的轻微并发症发生率为 28%,主要并发症发生率为 3%5 。具体来说,作者指出的两种主要并发症是滑膜瘘和近端指间关节关节纤维化。在一项更大规模的研究中,543 名患者接受了 795 次开放式扳机松解术,作者报告的轻微并发症发生率为 9.6%,主要并发症发生率为 2.4%6 。此外,最常见的并发症包括持续僵硬、肿胀或疼痛。在该分析中,作者认为镇静、男性和全身麻醉可能与更高的风险有关6:如果对拇指进行开放性扳机松解术,外科医生应识别并保护桡侧数字神经,该神经直接穿过 A1 滑轮:MCP = 掌指关节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tendon Sheath Incision for Surgical Treatment of Trigger Finger.

Background: Open trigger finger release is an elective surgical procedure that serves as the gold standard treatment for trigger digits. The aim of this procedure is to release the A1 pulley in a setting in which the pulley is completely visible, ultimately allowing the flexor tendons that were previously impinged on to glide more easily through the tendon sheath. Although A1-or the first annular pulley-is the site of triggering in nearly all cases, alternative sites include A2, A3, and the palmar aponeurosis1.

Description: Typically, the surgical procedure can be conducted in an outpatient setting and can vary in duration from a few minutes to half an hour. The surgical procedure involves the patient lying in the supine position with the operative hand positioned to the side. A small incision, ranging from 1 to 1.5 cm, is made on the volar side of the hand, just proximal to the A1 pulley in the skin crease in order to minimize scarring. Once the underlying neurovascular structures are exposed, the A1 pulley is released longitudinally at least to the level of the A2 pulley, followed by decompression of the flexor tendons that were previously impinged on. In order to confirm the release, the patient is asked to flex and extend the affected finger. The wound is irrigated and closed once the release is confirmed by both the patient and surgeon.

Alternatives: Aside from an open release, trigger finger can be treated nonoperatively with use of splinting and corticosteroid injection. Alternative operative treatments include a percutaneous release, which involves the use of a needle to release the A1 pulley2. Trigger finger can initially be treated nonoperatively. If unsuccessful, surgical intervention is considered the ultimate remedy2.

Rationale: Because of their efficacious nature, corticosteroid injections are indicated preoperatively, particularly in non-diabetic patients3. Splinting is often an appropriate treatment option in patients who wish to avoid a corticosteroid injection1. However, if nonoperative treatment modalities fail to resolve pain and symptoms, surgical intervention is indicated2. In comparison with a percutaneous trigger finger release, an open release provides enhanced exposure and may be safer with respect to avoiding iatrogenic neurovascular injury2. However, in a randomized controlled trial, Gilberts et al. found no difference in the rates of recurrence when comparing open versus percutaneous trigger finger release4.

Expected outcomes: With reported success rates ranging from 90% to 100%, the open release of the A1 pulley is considered a common procedure associated with minimal complications2. Complications of the procedure were assessed in a retrospective analysis of 43 patients who underwent 78 open trigger releases performed by 1 surgeon. In that study, the authors reported a minor complication rate of 28% and a major complication rate of 3%5. Specifically, the 2 major complications noted by the authors were a synovial fistula and a proximal interphalangeal joint arthrofibrosis. In a larger study that included 543 patients who underwent 795 open trigger releases, the authors reported a minor complication rate of 9.6% and major complication rate of 2.4%6. Furthermore, the most common complications involved persistent stiffness, swelling, or pain. In that analysis, the authors suggested that sedation, male gender, and general anesthesia may be associated with greater risk6.

Important tips: At the discretion of the surgeon, a longitudinal, transverse, or oblique incision is made directly on top of the tendon at the level of the metacarpophalangeal joint, which is the preferred incision site because it provides maximal accessibility to the A1 pulley.Local anesthesia is preferred because it allows the patient and surgeon to confirm the release immediately.If conducting an open trigger release on the thumb, the surgeon should identify and protect the radial digital nerve, which courses directly over the A1 pulley.

Acronyms and abbreviations: MCP = metacarpophalangeal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信