隔壁有监管,但这里没有…:评估不受监管游说的不透明世界中行为者的意见

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
J. Hogan, G. Murphy, R. Chari
{"title":"隔壁有监管,但这里没有…:评估不受监管游说的不透明世界中行为者的意见","authors":"J. Hogan, G. Murphy, R. Chari","doi":"10.21427/D7KB7K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lobbying of government by various interests is regarded as central to the democratic process. Deliberative democratic theorists tell us that the regulation of lobbying has a positive effect on political systems, and the behaviour of those within them. Yet, only four democratic systems (Canada, USA, EU and Germany) have legislation regulating lobbyists’ activities, and even this regulation is not all pervasive. Here we examine the attitudes of actors in states, provinces, and institutions in the above democracies, where no regulations exist. This ensures that the actors we deal with have knowledge of lobbying regulations, what these regulations entail, as well as the consequences of the absence of any such regulations. Our objective is to discover if these actors see benefits in the introduction of lobbying legislation, as is suggested by deliberative democratic theory.","PeriodicalId":42225,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Political Science Review","volume":"2 1","pages":"125-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Next Door they have Regulation, but not here …: Assessing the Opinions of Actors in the Opaque World of Unregulated Lobbying\",\"authors\":\"J. Hogan, G. Murphy, R. Chari\",\"doi\":\"10.21427/D7KB7K\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The lobbying of government by various interests is regarded as central to the democratic process. Deliberative democratic theorists tell us that the regulation of lobbying has a positive effect on political systems, and the behaviour of those within them. Yet, only four democratic systems (Canada, USA, EU and Germany) have legislation regulating lobbyists’ activities, and even this regulation is not all pervasive. Here we examine the attitudes of actors in states, provinces, and institutions in the above democracies, where no regulations exist. This ensures that the actors we deal with have knowledge of lobbying regulations, what these regulations entail, as well as the consequences of the absence of any such regulations. Our objective is to discover if these actors see benefits in the introduction of lobbying legislation, as is suggested by deliberative democratic theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Political Science Review\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"125-151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Political Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21427/D7KB7K\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21427/D7KB7K","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

各种利益集团对政府的游说被认为是民主进程的核心。协商民主理论家告诉我们,对游说活动的监管对政治制度及其内部人士的行为有积极影响。然而,只有四个民主制度(加拿大、美国、欧盟和德国)有立法规范游说者的活动,即使这样的监管也不是普遍存在的。在这里,我们研究了上述民主国家中没有法规存在的州、省和机构的行为者的态度。这确保了我们所处理的行为者了解游说法规,这些法规的内容,以及缺乏此类法规的后果。我们的目标是发现这些行为者是否像协商民主理论所建议的那样,看到了引入游说立法的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Next Door they have Regulation, but not here …: Assessing the Opinions of Actors in the Opaque World of Unregulated Lobbying
The lobbying of government by various interests is regarded as central to the democratic process. Deliberative democratic theorists tell us that the regulation of lobbying has a positive effect on political systems, and the behaviour of those within them. Yet, only four democratic systems (Canada, USA, EU and Germany) have legislation regulating lobbyists’ activities, and even this regulation is not all pervasive. Here we examine the attitudes of actors in states, provinces, and institutions in the above democracies, where no regulations exist. This ensures that the actors we deal with have knowledge of lobbying regulations, what these regulations entail, as well as the consequences of the absence of any such regulations. Our objective is to discover if these actors see benefits in the introduction of lobbying legislation, as is suggested by deliberative democratic theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信