司法对变革的反应：1986年大选前后的加州最高法院

Q2 Social Sciences

Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy Pub Date : 2003-12-21 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.466221

Nicholas L. Georgakopoulos

{"title":"司法对变革的反应：1986年大选前后的加州最高法院","authors":"Nicholas L. Georgakopoulos","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.466221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After an unsuccessful attempt in 1982, the California electorate removed three of the Justices of the Supreme Court of California in the 1986 elections because they were soft on crime. This article studies the voting patterns of the three justices who were on the California Supreme Court before and after the elections, revealing three distinct judicial and political strategies.","PeriodicalId":39833,"journal":{"name":"Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy","volume":"13 1","pages":"405-430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judicial Reaction to Change: The California Supreme Court around the 1986 Elections\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas L. Georgakopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.466221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After an unsuccessful attempt in 1982, the California electorate removed three of the Justices of the Supreme Court of California in the 1986 elections because they were soft on crime. This article studies the voting patterns of the three justices who were on the California Supreme Court before and after the elections, revealing three distinct judicial and political strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"405-430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.466221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.466221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在1982年的一次不成功的尝试之后，加州选民在1986年的选举中罢免了加州最高法院的三名法官，因为他们对犯罪软弱无力。本文研究了加州最高法院三位大法官在选举前后的投票模式，揭示了三种截然不同的司法和政治策略。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Judicial Reaction to Change: The California Supreme Court around the 1986 Elections

After an unsuccessful attempt in 1982, the California electorate removed three of the Justices of the Supreme Court of California in the 1986 elections because they were soft on crime. This article studies the voting patterns of the three justices who were on the California Supreme Court before and after the elections, revealing three distinct judicial and political strategies.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy Social Sciences-Law

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Founded in 1991, the Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy (JLPP) has quickly risen to become one of the leading public policy journals in the nation. A fixture among the top 10 policy journals, JLPP has consistently been among the top 100 student-edited law journals. JLPP publishes articles, student notes, essays, book reviews, and other scholarly works that examine the intersections of compelling public or social policy issues and the law. As a journal of law and policy, we are a publication that not only analyzes the law but also seeks to impact its development.