如何在娱乐治疗学术项目的课程和作业中嵌入实地工作

IF 0.7 Q4 REHABILITATION
Kristin L. Whitely, Susan Purrington, Brent L. Hawkins, Erik Luvaas, Gena Bell Vargas, Emma Bentley-Gottel
{"title":"如何在娱乐治疗学术项目的课程和作业中嵌入实地工作","authors":"Kristin L. Whitely, Susan Purrington, Brent L. Hawkins, Erik Luvaas, Gena Bell Vargas, Emma Bentley-Gottel","doi":"10.18666/trj-2023-v57-i3-11987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this second of a three-part study on fieldwork in Recreation(al) Therapy/Therapeutic Recreation (RT) education was to create a landscape of fieldwork as it pertains to academic courses. Course- related fieldwork is a learning opportunity for RT students to develop and practice competencies through hands-on experiences in applied RT service settings. In an online survey, 54 of 95 programs surveyed responded. Forty-four indicated that fieldwork was incorporated in 172 courses. All the courses fell within nine course-types: Introduction/Foundations, Assessment, Programming, Management, Populations/Settings, Interventions/Modalities, Research/Evaluation, Issues and Trends, and Other Fieldwork Placements (such as practicum, junior internship). This brief report discusses findings in the areas of course requirements, approaches to designing fieldwork experiences, settings and populations, and course connection to the RT process (i.e., assessment, planning, implementation, evaluation, and documentation).The findings revealed the majority of courses containing fieldwork are similarly required for graduation, prior to the NCTRC internship, worth 3-credits, and require an average of 12-23 hours of fieldwork. However, the settings and populations CTRS' work in most are underrepresented in course-related fieldwork and several courses reported lack of connection to the RT process. Further collaboration is needed to clarify course-related fieldwork terminology and develop guidelines for all RT academic programs. Implications address curriculum considerations and future research.","PeriodicalId":45238,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Recreation Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Fieldwork is Embedded within Curricula and Coursework in Recreational Therapy Academic Programs\",\"authors\":\"Kristin L. Whitely, Susan Purrington, Brent L. Hawkins, Erik Luvaas, Gena Bell Vargas, Emma Bentley-Gottel\",\"doi\":\"10.18666/trj-2023-v57-i3-11987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this second of a three-part study on fieldwork in Recreation(al) Therapy/Therapeutic Recreation (RT) education was to create a landscape of fieldwork as it pertains to academic courses. Course- related fieldwork is a learning opportunity for RT students to develop and practice competencies through hands-on experiences in applied RT service settings. In an online survey, 54 of 95 programs surveyed responded. Forty-four indicated that fieldwork was incorporated in 172 courses. All the courses fell within nine course-types: Introduction/Foundations, Assessment, Programming, Management, Populations/Settings, Interventions/Modalities, Research/Evaluation, Issues and Trends, and Other Fieldwork Placements (such as practicum, junior internship). This brief report discusses findings in the areas of course requirements, approaches to designing fieldwork experiences, settings and populations, and course connection to the RT process (i.e., assessment, planning, implementation, evaluation, and documentation).The findings revealed the majority of courses containing fieldwork are similarly required for graduation, prior to the NCTRC internship, worth 3-credits, and require an average of 12-23 hours of fieldwork. However, the settings and populations CTRS' work in most are underrepresented in course-related fieldwork and several courses reported lack of connection to the RT process. Further collaboration is needed to clarify course-related fieldwork terminology and develop guidelines for all RT academic programs. Implications address curriculum considerations and future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Recreation Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Recreation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18666/trj-2023-v57-i3-11987\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Recreation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18666/trj-2023-v57-i3-11987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是一项关于娱乐(全部)治疗/治疗性娱乐(RT)教育中实地考察的三部分研究的第二部分,其目的是创建一个与学术课程相关的实地考察景观。与课程相关的实地工作是一个学习机会,让RT学生通过在应用RT服务环境中的实践经验来发展和实践能力。在一项在线调查中,95个项目中有54个做出了回应。44个国家表示,172门课程包含了实地考察。所有课程分为九种课程类型:导论/基础、评估、规划、管理、人口/环境、干预/模式、研究/评估、问题和趋势,以及其他实地实习(如实习、初级实习)。这篇简短的报告讨论了课程要求、设计实地工作经验的方法、设置和人口,以及课程与RT过程的联系(即,评估、计划、实现、评估和文档)方面的发现。调查结果显示,在NCTRC实习之前,大多数包含实地考察的课程在毕业前都是类似的要求,价值3学分,平均要求12-23小时的实地考察。然而,在与课程相关的实地考察中,CTRS的工作在大多数环境和人群中代表性不足,并且有几门课程报告缺乏与RT过程的联系。需要进一步的合作来澄清与课程相关的实地考察术语,并为所有RT学术项目制定指导方针。启示涉及课程考虑和未来研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Fieldwork is Embedded within Curricula and Coursework in Recreational Therapy Academic Programs
The purpose of this second of a three-part study on fieldwork in Recreation(al) Therapy/Therapeutic Recreation (RT) education was to create a landscape of fieldwork as it pertains to academic courses. Course- related fieldwork is a learning opportunity for RT students to develop and practice competencies through hands-on experiences in applied RT service settings. In an online survey, 54 of 95 programs surveyed responded. Forty-four indicated that fieldwork was incorporated in 172 courses. All the courses fell within nine course-types: Introduction/Foundations, Assessment, Programming, Management, Populations/Settings, Interventions/Modalities, Research/Evaluation, Issues and Trends, and Other Fieldwork Placements (such as practicum, junior internship). This brief report discusses findings in the areas of course requirements, approaches to designing fieldwork experiences, settings and populations, and course connection to the RT process (i.e., assessment, planning, implementation, evaluation, and documentation).The findings revealed the majority of courses containing fieldwork are similarly required for graduation, prior to the NCTRC internship, worth 3-credits, and require an average of 12-23 hours of fieldwork. However, the settings and populations CTRS' work in most are underrepresented in course-related fieldwork and several courses reported lack of connection to the RT process. Further collaboration is needed to clarify course-related fieldwork terminology and develop guidelines for all RT academic programs. Implications address curriculum considerations and future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信