澳大利亚对具有动物福利和其他信誉属性的认证牛肉的偏好

International Journal on Food System Dynamics Pub Date : 2020-07-21 DOI:10.18461/IJFSD.V11I3.50

L. E. Morales, G. Griffith, E. Fleming, S. Mounter, V. Wright, W. Umberger

{"title":"澳大利亚对具有动物福利和其他信誉属性的认证牛肉的偏好","authors":"L. E. Morales, G. Griffith, E. Fleming, S. Mounter, V. Wright, W. Umberger","doi":"10.18461/IJFSD.V11I3.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concerns over livestock production practices have resulted in increased consumer preferences for certified products. Australian beef buyers’ survey data revealed the preferences of consumers who would buy differentiated beef based on animal welfare, safety, health, or environmental-friendly considerations. Female respondents are more likely to buy certified animal welfare products. Buyers with children, and those who value branded beef, are more likely to buy products differentiated by a bundle of credence attributes. Given that Australian beef consumers eat similar amounts, there are opportunities for differentiating beef products according to credence attributes and offering them in a range of retailers.","PeriodicalId":37887,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Food System Dynamics","volume":"11 1","pages":"202-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferences for Certified Beef with Animal Welfare and Other Credence Attributes in Australia\",\"authors\":\"L. E. Morales, G. Griffith, E. Fleming, S. Mounter, V. Wright, W. Umberger\",\"doi\":\"10.18461/IJFSD.V11I3.50\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Concerns over livestock production practices have resulted in increased consumer preferences for certified products. Australian beef buyers’ survey data revealed the preferences of consumers who would buy differentiated beef based on animal welfare, safety, health, or environmental-friendly considerations. Female respondents are more likely to buy certified animal welfare products. Buyers with children, and those who value branded beef, are more likely to buy products differentiated by a bundle of credence attributes. Given that Australian beef consumers eat similar amounts, there are opportunities for differentiating beef products according to credence attributes and offering them in a range of retailers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal on Food System Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"202-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal on Food System Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18461/IJFSD.V11I3.50\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Food System Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18461/IJFSD.V11I3.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

对畜牧生产方式的关注导致消费者对认证产品的偏好增加。澳大利亚牛肉购买者的调查数据揭示了消费者的偏好，他们会基于动物福利、安全、健康或环境友好的考虑来购买差异化牛肉。女性受访者更有可能购买经过认证的动物福利产品。有孩子的消费者，以及那些看重品牌牛肉的消费者，更有可能购买由一系列信任属性区分的产品。考虑到澳大利亚牛肉消费者的消费量相似，有机会根据信用属性区分牛肉产品，并在一系列零售商中提供。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Preferences for Certified Beef with Animal Welfare and Other Credence Attributes in Australia

Concerns over livestock production practices have resulted in increased consumer preferences for certified products. Australian beef buyers’ survey data revealed the preferences of consumers who would buy differentiated beef based on animal welfare, safety, health, or environmental-friendly considerations. Female respondents are more likely to buy certified animal welfare products. Buyers with children, and those who value branded beef, are more likely to buy products differentiated by a bundle of credence attributes. Given that Australian beef consumers eat similar amounts, there are opportunities for differentiating beef products according to credence attributes and offering them in a range of retailers.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal on Food System Dynamics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Understanding the development of the food system requires a system view that captures the complexity of the system and its many interrelationships with its economic, social and natural environments. The Journal accepts and offers papers within this broad range of issues focussing on the management, policy, marketing, consumer aspects, transparency, e-commerce, institutional or regional development, information and communication systems, ressource economics, production economics, chain management, network economics, and similar aspects. Papers may focus on modeling, empirical research or theoretical analyis. This broad range of publication opportunities asks authors to follow clear lines of arguments and to present arguments in a convincing way that avoids unnecessary complexities of model formulations if not relevant for the support of arguments. The publication of scientific articles is complemented by a number of sections that provide room for publications with a more specific focus: ''Case studies'': A section on case studies of the ''Harvard Type'' allows the publication of studies that might build on established scientific methodology but demonstrate its use in ceratin decision environments. Case studies might be complemented by ''teaching cases'' that are kept on a database outside the journal but accessible to readers on approval by authors. ''Research Forum'': It allows to discuss newly emerging research challenges or to contribute to ongoing scientific discussions on research problems. In addition, authors might initiate a discussion on issues brought up by articles published in the journal. ''Research Notes'': It provides room for specific shorter scientific contributions with a narrow scope.