{"title":"北欧电力市场的担保期权策略","authors":"Antti Klemola, Jukka Sihvonen","doi":"10.21314/jem.2015.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We test the performance of popular option strategies in the Nordic power derivative market using 12 years of data. We find that protective put strategies outperform long forward and covered call strategies on risk-adjusted basis, because the payoff function of the protective put seems a good fit to the market dynamics in both good and bad times. Detailed analysis reveals differences across moneyness levels and holding periods that can be further exploited. Different delta levels of the analyzed strategies allow for flexible hedging solutions.","PeriodicalId":43528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy Markets","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Covered Option Strategies in Nordic Electricity Markets\",\"authors\":\"Antti Klemola, Jukka Sihvonen\",\"doi\":\"10.21314/jem.2015.120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We test the performance of popular option strategies in the Nordic power derivative market using 12 years of data. We find that protective put strategies outperform long forward and covered call strategies on risk-adjusted basis, because the payoff function of the protective put seems a good fit to the market dynamics in both good and bad times. Detailed analysis reveals differences across moneyness levels and holding periods that can be further exploited. Different delta levels of the analyzed strategies allow for flexible hedging solutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Energy Markets\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Energy Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21314/jem.2015.120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/jem.2015.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Covered Option Strategies in Nordic Electricity Markets
We test the performance of popular option strategies in the Nordic power derivative market using 12 years of data. We find that protective put strategies outperform long forward and covered call strategies on risk-adjusted basis, because the payoff function of the protective put seems a good fit to the market dynamics in both good and bad times. Detailed analysis reveals differences across moneyness levels and holding periods that can be further exploited. Different delta levels of the analyzed strategies allow for flexible hedging solutions.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
