{"title":"以色列/巴勒斯坦的一国现实:对欧洲和其他对建设性冲突转变感兴趣的各方的挑战","authors":"M. Asseburg","doi":"10.20542/2307-1494-2021-2-96-109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past three decades, a one-state reality with unequal rights has become entrenched in Israel/Palestine. It has thus become conspicuous that the approach agreed upon in Oslo in the mid-1990s has failed to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This has accentuated the dilemmas of Europe’s approach to advance Israeli-Palestinian peace. The EU and its member states have continued to entertain the mantras of a negotiated two-state solution and intra-Palestinian reconciliation – while remaining in the back seat when it comes to shaping dynamics on the ground and erecting hurdles for themselves to make progress towards reconciliation. As a consequence, the chasm between European rhetoric on conflict resolution and conflict realities on the ground has ever more widened. The article analyzes European policy objectives and instruments concerning Israel/Palestine and explains why the Europeans have not been able to assume a more prominent and effective role with regards to realizing their proclaimed objectives. It also discusses prospects for European policy making on Israel/Palestine as well as options for cooperative or complementary approaches with other international actors, such as Russia.","PeriodicalId":34887,"journal":{"name":"Puti k miru i bezopasnosti","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The one-state reality in Israel/Palestine: a challenge for Europe and other parties interested in constructive conflict transformation\",\"authors\":\"M. Asseburg\",\"doi\":\"10.20542/2307-1494-2021-2-96-109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past three decades, a one-state reality with unequal rights has become entrenched in Israel/Palestine. It has thus become conspicuous that the approach agreed upon in Oslo in the mid-1990s has failed to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This has accentuated the dilemmas of Europe’s approach to advance Israeli-Palestinian peace. The EU and its member states have continued to entertain the mantras of a negotiated two-state solution and intra-Palestinian reconciliation – while remaining in the back seat when it comes to shaping dynamics on the ground and erecting hurdles for themselves to make progress towards reconciliation. As a consequence, the chasm between European rhetoric on conflict resolution and conflict realities on the ground has ever more widened. The article analyzes European policy objectives and instruments concerning Israel/Palestine and explains why the Europeans have not been able to assume a more prominent and effective role with regards to realizing their proclaimed objectives. It also discusses prospects for European policy making on Israel/Palestine as well as options for cooperative or complementary approaches with other international actors, such as Russia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Puti k miru i bezopasnosti\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Puti k miru i bezopasnosti\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20542/2307-1494-2021-2-96-109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Puti k miru i bezopasnosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20542/2307-1494-2021-2-96-109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The one-state reality in Israel/Palestine: a challenge for Europe and other parties interested in constructive conflict transformation
Over the past three decades, a one-state reality with unequal rights has become entrenched in Israel/Palestine. It has thus become conspicuous that the approach agreed upon in Oslo in the mid-1990s has failed to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This has accentuated the dilemmas of Europe’s approach to advance Israeli-Palestinian peace. The EU and its member states have continued to entertain the mantras of a negotiated two-state solution and intra-Palestinian reconciliation – while remaining in the back seat when it comes to shaping dynamics on the ground and erecting hurdles for themselves to make progress towards reconciliation. As a consequence, the chasm between European rhetoric on conflict resolution and conflict realities on the ground has ever more widened. The article analyzes European policy objectives and instruments concerning Israel/Palestine and explains why the Europeans have not been able to assume a more prominent and effective role with regards to realizing their proclaimed objectives. It also discusses prospects for European policy making on Israel/Palestine as well as options for cooperative or complementary approaches with other international actors, such as Russia.