Ryan Chabot, R. Welsh, Cody R Mott, Jeffrey R Guertin, B. Shamblin, B. Witherington
{"title":"墨西哥湾东北部佛罗里达州大湾的海龟数量评估","authors":"Ryan Chabot, R. Welsh, Cody R Mott, Jeffrey R Guertin, B. Shamblin, B. Witherington","doi":"10.18785/gcr.3201.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coastal waters of Florida’s Big Bend, Gulf of Mexico (GOM) once supported one of the largest sea turtle fisheries in the United States. To fill an information gap in this region on abundance and distribution of sea turtles, we used vessel—based distance sampling and active capture methods to characterize current foraging aggregations near the St. Martins Marsh Aquatic Preserve. Over 10 sampling periods between 2012—2018, we completed 513 km of transects and recorded 819 turtles among 4 species—green turtle (Chelonia mydas, n = 624), Kemp’s ridley (Lepidochelys kempii, n = 147), loggerhead (Caretta caretta, n = 47), and a single hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata). Turtle densities in 4 study plots within the 200 km2 study site ranged from 57—221 immature green turtles/km2, 16—56 immature Kemp’s ridleys/km2, and 1—14 juvenile—to—adult loggerheads/km2. Of 200 green turtles captured, 67.5% showed skin tumors consistent with fibropapillomatosis, a frequency similar to that from urbanized estuaries of Florida’s east coast. The largest green turtles (> 60 cm straight standard carapace length), abundant in the southern portion of our study area, are of note because this size class is uncommonly recorded within US territorial waters. Analyses of green turtle mtDNA haplotypes found contributions from rookeries in the western GOM, Mexican Caribbean, and Costa Rica. Although Big Bend protected areas were principally designed to conserve marine and coastal habitats, these regulatory zones have also effectively encompassed a hotspot for foraging sea turtles.","PeriodicalId":36764,"journal":{"name":"GULF AND CARIBBEAN RESEARCH","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Sea Turtle Population Assessment for Florida's Big Bend, Northeastern Gulf of Mexico\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Chabot, R. Welsh, Cody R Mott, Jeffrey R Guertin, B. Shamblin, B. Witherington\",\"doi\":\"10.18785/gcr.3201.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Coastal waters of Florida’s Big Bend, Gulf of Mexico (GOM) once supported one of the largest sea turtle fisheries in the United States. To fill an information gap in this region on abundance and distribution of sea turtles, we used vessel—based distance sampling and active capture methods to characterize current foraging aggregations near the St. Martins Marsh Aquatic Preserve. Over 10 sampling periods between 2012—2018, we completed 513 km of transects and recorded 819 turtles among 4 species—green turtle (Chelonia mydas, n = 624), Kemp’s ridley (Lepidochelys kempii, n = 147), loggerhead (Caretta caretta, n = 47), and a single hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata). Turtle densities in 4 study plots within the 200 km2 study site ranged from 57—221 immature green turtles/km2, 16—56 immature Kemp’s ridleys/km2, and 1—14 juvenile—to—adult loggerheads/km2. Of 200 green turtles captured, 67.5% showed skin tumors consistent with fibropapillomatosis, a frequency similar to that from urbanized estuaries of Florida’s east coast. The largest green turtles (> 60 cm straight standard carapace length), abundant in the southern portion of our study area, are of note because this size class is uncommonly recorded within US territorial waters. Analyses of green turtle mtDNA haplotypes found contributions from rookeries in the western GOM, Mexican Caribbean, and Costa Rica. Although Big Bend protected areas were principally designed to conserve marine and coastal habitats, these regulatory zones have also effectively encompassed a hotspot for foraging sea turtles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GULF AND CARIBBEAN RESEARCH\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GULF AND CARIBBEAN RESEARCH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18785/gcr.3201.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GULF AND CARIBBEAN RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18785/gcr.3201.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
摘要
佛罗里达大湾的沿海水域,墨西哥湾(GOM)曾经是美国最大的海龟渔场之一。为了填补该地区海龟丰度和分布的信息空白,我们采用基于船只的距离采样和主动捕获方法来表征圣马丁沼泽水生保护区附近当前的觅食聚集。在2012年至2018年的10个采样期内,我们完成了513公里的样带,记录了4种海龟中的819只,包括绿海龟(Chelonia mydas, n = 624)、肯普氏蠵龟(Lepidochelys kempii, n = 147)、红海龟(Caretta Caretta, n = 47)和一种玳瑁(Eretmochelys imbricata)。在200 km2的研究点内,4个研究样地的龟密度分别为幼绿龟57 ~ 221只/km2、幼红蠵龟16 ~ 56只/km2、幼成红蠵龟1 ~ 14只/km2。在捕获的200只绿海龟中,67.5%的海龟显示出与纤维乳头状瘤病一致的皮肤肿瘤,其频率与佛罗里达东海岸城市化河口的频率相似。最大的绿海龟(直标准甲壳长约60厘米)在我们研究区域的南部大量存在,值得注意的是,这种体型的海龟在美国领海内很少有记录。对绿海龟mtDNA单倍型的分析发现,它们来自墨西哥湾西部、墨西哥加勒比海和哥斯达黎加的栖息地。虽然大本德保护区主要是为了保护海洋和沿海栖息地而设计的,但这些监管区域也有效地包围了海龟觅食的热点。
A Sea Turtle Population Assessment for Florida's Big Bend, Northeastern Gulf of Mexico
Coastal waters of Florida’s Big Bend, Gulf of Mexico (GOM) once supported one of the largest sea turtle fisheries in the United States. To fill an information gap in this region on abundance and distribution of sea turtles, we used vessel—based distance sampling and active capture methods to characterize current foraging aggregations near the St. Martins Marsh Aquatic Preserve. Over 10 sampling periods between 2012—2018, we completed 513 km of transects and recorded 819 turtles among 4 species—green turtle (Chelonia mydas, n = 624), Kemp’s ridley (Lepidochelys kempii, n = 147), loggerhead (Caretta caretta, n = 47), and a single hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata). Turtle densities in 4 study plots within the 200 km2 study site ranged from 57—221 immature green turtles/km2, 16—56 immature Kemp’s ridleys/km2, and 1—14 juvenile—to—adult loggerheads/km2. Of 200 green turtles captured, 67.5% showed skin tumors consistent with fibropapillomatosis, a frequency similar to that from urbanized estuaries of Florida’s east coast. The largest green turtles (> 60 cm straight standard carapace length), abundant in the southern portion of our study area, are of note because this size class is uncommonly recorded within US territorial waters. Analyses of green turtle mtDNA haplotypes found contributions from rookeries in the western GOM, Mexican Caribbean, and Costa Rica. Although Big Bend protected areas were principally designed to conserve marine and coastal habitats, these regulatory zones have also effectively encompassed a hotspot for foraging sea turtles.