Burch-Schneider笼在髋臼骨缺损中的应力分析:一个案例研究

K. Plessers, H. Mau
{"title":"Burch-Schneider笼在髋臼骨缺损中的应力分析:一个案例研究","authors":"K. Plessers, H. Mau","doi":"10.15438/RR.6.1.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Burch-Schneider cages are often used for the treatment of acetabular bone defects. In several clinical studies these cages have shown good mid- to long-term results. However, a higher failure rate has been reported in large Paprosky IIIB defects compared with smaller Paprosky II-IIIA defects. This study aims to investigate the effect of cage support on cage failure by means of finite element analysis. The Von Mises stresses in both the implant and the bone are analyzed for a Burch-Schneider cage used in the following scenarios: (1) a large acetabular bone defect, (2) a small acetabular bone defect and (3) a large acetabular bone defect in combination with a reinforcement plate. The results show that implant and bone stresses are higher in the large defect (99 th percentile of 146.6 and 73.5 MPa respectively) than in the small defect (99 th percentile of 43.9 and 47.9 MPa respectively). Adding a reinforcement plate to posteriorly support the cage decreases the stresses but not fully compensates for the missing bone support (99 th percentile of 93.1 and 55.3 MPa respectively). Since high stresses cause an increased risk for fatigue failure and implant loosening, sufficient implant support is required to reduce the risk of cage failure.","PeriodicalId":20884,"journal":{"name":"Reconstructive Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress analysis of a Burch-Schneider cage in an acetabular bone defect: A case study\",\"authors\":\"K. Plessers, H. Mau\",\"doi\":\"10.15438/RR.6.1.141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Burch-Schneider cages are often used for the treatment of acetabular bone defects. In several clinical studies these cages have shown good mid- to long-term results. However, a higher failure rate has been reported in large Paprosky IIIB defects compared with smaller Paprosky II-IIIA defects. This study aims to investigate the effect of cage support on cage failure by means of finite element analysis. The Von Mises stresses in both the implant and the bone are analyzed for a Burch-Schneider cage used in the following scenarios: (1) a large acetabular bone defect, (2) a small acetabular bone defect and (3) a large acetabular bone defect in combination with a reinforcement plate. The results show that implant and bone stresses are higher in the large defect (99 th percentile of 146.6 and 73.5 MPa respectively) than in the small defect (99 th percentile of 43.9 and 47.9 MPa respectively). Adding a reinforcement plate to posteriorly support the cage decreases the stresses but not fully compensates for the missing bone support (99 th percentile of 93.1 and 55.3 MPa respectively). Since high stresses cause an increased risk for fatigue failure and implant loosening, sufficient implant support is required to reduce the risk of cage failure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reconstructive Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reconstructive Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15438/RR.6.1.141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reconstructive Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15438/RR.6.1.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

Burch-Schneider固定架常用于治疗髋臼骨缺损。在一些临床研究中,这些笼显示出良好的中长期效果。然而,与较小的papprosky II-IIIA缺陷相比,大型papprosky IIIB缺陷的故障率更高。本文采用有限元分析的方法,研究了笼型支护对笼型破坏的影响。分析了Burch-Schneider cage在以下情况下使用的Von Mises应力:(1)大髋臼骨缺损,(2)小髋臼骨缺损,(3)大髋臼骨缺损联合加固板。结果表明:大缺损区种植体和骨应力(分别为146.6和73.5 MPa)高于小缺损区(分别为43.9和47.9 MPa)。在笼子的后侧增加一个加强板可以减少应力,但不能完全补偿缺失的骨支撑(99百分位数分别为93.1和55.3 MPa)。由于高应力会增加疲劳失效和种植体松动的风险,因此需要足够的种植体支撑来降低保持器失效的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stress analysis of a Burch-Schneider cage in an acetabular bone defect: A case study
Burch-Schneider cages are often used for the treatment of acetabular bone defects. In several clinical studies these cages have shown good mid- to long-term results. However, a higher failure rate has been reported in large Paprosky IIIB defects compared with smaller Paprosky II-IIIA defects. This study aims to investigate the effect of cage support on cage failure by means of finite element analysis. The Von Mises stresses in both the implant and the bone are analyzed for a Burch-Schneider cage used in the following scenarios: (1) a large acetabular bone defect, (2) a small acetabular bone defect and (3) a large acetabular bone defect in combination with a reinforcement plate. The results show that implant and bone stresses are higher in the large defect (99 th percentile of 146.6 and 73.5 MPa respectively) than in the small defect (99 th percentile of 43.9 and 47.9 MPa respectively). Adding a reinforcement plate to posteriorly support the cage decreases the stresses but not fully compensates for the missing bone support (99 th percentile of 93.1 and 55.3 MPa respectively). Since high stresses cause an increased risk for fatigue failure and implant loosening, sufficient implant support is required to reduce the risk of cage failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信