{"title":"关于保护年轻人免受吸烟的首字母缩略词培训计划的活动","authors":"Gökben Yasli, Gönül Dinç Horasan, Hilal Bati","doi":"10.20518/TJPH.173065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ozet Amac: Sigaradan korunmada genclere yonelik egitim programlari onemlidir. Calismada genclerde akran egitimi programinin sigara icme davranisi uzerindeki etkisini degerlendirmeyi amaclamaktadir. Yontem: Girisimsel tiptedir. Manisa Kent Merkezinde uc farkli liseye 2007-2008 egitim-ogretim yilinda devam eden ogrenciler kontrol grubu (n= 1737, katilim yuzdesi 89,6), ayni liselere 2008-2009 yilinda devam eden ogrenciler girisim grubu (n=1787, katilim yuzdesi 81,0) olarak ele alinmis, sigara icme verileri karsilastirilmistir. Girisim, 2008-2009 egitim ogretim yilinda akran egitimi programi seklinde uygulanmistir. Toplam 150 akran egiticisine egitimler verilmis (30’ar kisilik 5 grup, 3 seans egitim), akran egiticileri arkadaslarina sigaradan korunma konusunda egitim ve destek vermislerdir. Veriler Mayis 2008 ve Mayis 2009’da uygulanan ogrencilerin doldurdugu anketlerle toplanmistir. Girisim ve kontrol gruplarinin sigara icme ve sigarayi deneme insidanslari karsilastirilmistir. Veriler SPSS for Windows 10.0 istatistik paket programinda ki kare testi ve lojistik regresyon analizi ile degerlendirilmistir. Bulgular: Hic sigara icmemis olan genclerde sigara icme insidansi kontrol grubunda %3,2, girisim grubunda %2,9’dur (p=0,547). Onceki yil sigarayi denemis olanlarda sigara icme insidansi kontrol grubunda %6,3, girisim grubunda %9,4’dur (p=0,069). Sigara icme orani girisim ve kontrol gruplarinda sirasiyla olmak uzere onceki yil duzensiz icicilerde %72,2 ve %71,3 (p=0,876), onceki yil duzenli icicilerde %81,8 ve %77,9’dur (p=0,369). Onceki yil hic sigara icmemis olan genclerde sigarayi deneme insidansi kontrol grubunda %3,2, girisim grubunda %3,9 (p=0,397)’dur. Sonuc: Calismada akran egitimi programinin genclerin sigara icme davranisi uzerinde etkili olmadigi saptanmistir. Bu konuda daha buyuk gruplarda, uzun izlem donemi olan, akran egiticilerinin populer gencler arasindan secildigi programlarin yurutulerek etkinligin degerlendirilmesi onerilmektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Sigara, akran egitimi, sigara icme, sigarayi deneme. The effectiveness of the peer education program on smoking control among young people Abstract Objective :This study was planned to evaluate the impact of the peer education program on smoking behavior. Method: Interventional study. City Center of Manisa in the academic year 2007-2008 in three different high school students who continue their control group (n=1737, participation rate 89.6), the same students who continue their high schools in 2008-2009 i ntervention group (n=1787, participation rate 81,0) is considered, smoking data were compared. There were 150 peer volunteers in total (5 groups of 30 people, three sessions of education), training and support on smoking prevention peer educators gave to friends. The incidences of smoking and smoking trial intervention and control groups were compared. SPSS for Windows 10.0 program was evaluated by chi-square test and logistic regression analysis. Results: The incidence of smoking among youth in the control group who never smoked, 3.2%, 2.9% in the intervention group (p=0.547). Tried cigarette smoking in patients with previous years, the incidence of 6.3% in control group, 9.4% in the intervention group (p=0.069). Smoking rate in the intervention and control groups, 72.2% and 71.3% the previous year, irregular smokers (p=0.876), 81.8% and 77.9% the previous year, regular drinkers (p=0.369) Previous year trial the incidence of smoking among young people in the control group who had never smoked 3.2%, 3.9% in the intervention group (p=0.397). Conclusion: Peer volunteers’ education programme on smoking prevention has a limited effect on smoking prevention. Larger sample size and with longer follow up on impact of peer educational programmes on smoking prevention period should be carried out. Key Words: Smoking, peer education, smoking, regular smokers, try smoking","PeriodicalId":30432,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Public Health","volume":"10 1","pages":"59-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gençlerde sigaradan korunma konusunda akran eğitimi programının etkinliği\",\"authors\":\"Gökben Yasli, Gönül Dinç Horasan, Hilal Bati\",\"doi\":\"10.20518/TJPH.173065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ozet Amac: Sigaradan korunmada genclere yonelik egitim programlari onemlidir. Calismada genclerde akran egitimi programinin sigara icme davranisi uzerindeki etkisini degerlendirmeyi amaclamaktadir. Yontem: Girisimsel tiptedir. Manisa Kent Merkezinde uc farkli liseye 2007-2008 egitim-ogretim yilinda devam eden ogrenciler kontrol grubu (n= 1737, katilim yuzdesi 89,6), ayni liselere 2008-2009 yilinda devam eden ogrenciler girisim grubu (n=1787, katilim yuzdesi 81,0) olarak ele alinmis, sigara icme verileri karsilastirilmistir. Girisim, 2008-2009 egitim ogretim yilinda akran egitimi programi seklinde uygulanmistir. Toplam 150 akran egiticisine egitimler verilmis (30’ar kisilik 5 grup, 3 seans egitim), akran egiticileri arkadaslarina sigaradan korunma konusunda egitim ve destek vermislerdir. Veriler Mayis 2008 ve Mayis 2009’da uygulanan ogrencilerin doldurdugu anketlerle toplanmistir. Girisim ve kontrol gruplarinin sigara icme ve sigarayi deneme insidanslari karsilastirilmistir. Veriler SPSS for Windows 10.0 istatistik paket programinda ki kare testi ve lojistik regresyon analizi ile degerlendirilmistir. Bulgular: Hic sigara icmemis olan genclerde sigara icme insidansi kontrol grubunda %3,2, girisim grubunda %2,9’dur (p=0,547). Onceki yil sigarayi denemis olanlarda sigara icme insidansi kontrol grubunda %6,3, girisim grubunda %9,4’dur (p=0,069). Sigara icme orani girisim ve kontrol gruplarinda sirasiyla olmak uzere onceki yil duzensiz icicilerde %72,2 ve %71,3 (p=0,876), onceki yil duzenli icicilerde %81,8 ve %77,9’dur (p=0,369). Onceki yil hic sigara icmemis olan genclerde sigarayi deneme insidansi kontrol grubunda %3,2, girisim grubunda %3,9 (p=0,397)’dur. Sonuc: Calismada akran egitimi programinin genclerin sigara icme davranisi uzerinde etkili olmadigi saptanmistir. Bu konuda daha buyuk gruplarda, uzun izlem donemi olan, akran egiticilerinin populer gencler arasindan secildigi programlarin yurutulerek etkinligin degerlendirilmesi onerilmektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Sigara, akran egitimi, sigara icme, sigarayi deneme. The effectiveness of the peer education program on smoking control among young people Abstract Objective :This study was planned to evaluate the impact of the peer education program on smoking behavior. Method: Interventional study. City Center of Manisa in the academic year 2007-2008 in three different high school students who continue their control group (n=1737, participation rate 89.6), the same students who continue their high schools in 2008-2009 i ntervention group (n=1787, participation rate 81,0) is considered, smoking data were compared. There were 150 peer volunteers in total (5 groups of 30 people, three sessions of education), training and support on smoking prevention peer educators gave to friends. The incidences of smoking and smoking trial intervention and control groups were compared. SPSS for Windows 10.0 program was evaluated by chi-square test and logistic regression analysis. Results: The incidence of smoking among youth in the control group who never smoked, 3.2%, 2.9% in the intervention group (p=0.547). Tried cigarette smoking in patients with previous years, the incidence of 6.3% in control group, 9.4% in the intervention group (p=0.069). Smoking rate in the intervention and control groups, 72.2% and 71.3% the previous year, irregular smokers (p=0.876), 81.8% and 77.9% the previous year, regular drinkers (p=0.369) Previous year trial the incidence of smoking among young people in the control group who had never smoked 3.2%, 3.9% in the intervention group (p=0.397). Conclusion: Peer volunteers’ education programme on smoking prevention has a limited effect on smoking prevention. Larger sample size and with longer follow up on impact of peer educational programmes on smoking prevention period should be carried out. Key Words: Smoking, peer education, smoking, regular smokers, try smoking\",\"PeriodicalId\":30432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"59-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20518/TJPH.173065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20518/TJPH.173065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
Ozet Amac:年轻人非常善于照顾香烟。在Calisma,年轻人的目标是减少吸烟对孩子的影响。Yontem:Girisimsel tiptedir。在Manisa Kent,2007-2008年由该高中控制的一群食人魔(n=1737,杀手的电梯89.6)、2008-2009年继续存在的那群食人魔(n=1787,杀手电梯81.0)和2008-2009年继续出现的那群巨魔(n=1787,凶手电梯81.0。2008-2009年,团队执行不适用于参与领域。共有150名acran演员(30岁,5组,3次执行死刑)被承诺保护他们免受背后的香烟伤害。数据是在2008年5月和2009年5月收集的,充满了食人魔的调查。输入组和控制组的香烟和香烟已耗尽。统计软件包程序中的数据SPSS for Windows 10.0已通过平方检验和逻辑回归分析下载。在吸烟的年轻人中,得分为3.2%,其中在输入组中为%2.9%(p=0.547)。在吸烟的第一年,对照组的吸烟率为6.3%,输入组为9.4%(p=0.069)。香烟烟雾侵入组和对照组包括西拉病%72,2和%71,3(p=0876),一年一次的杜曾利冰毒%81,8和%77,9(p=0369)。在控制幼虫%3,2、幼虫%3,9(p=0397)’dur的情况下,有一个重要的信号。结果:Calisman情报计划不会影响年轻人的吸烟。为了做到这一点,鼓励长期监测设施、缩写工程师减少与年轻人分离的项目的影响。关键词:香烟,失明,吸烟,吸烟。同伴教育计划在年轻人中控制吸烟的有效性摘要目的:本研究旨在评估同伴教育计划对吸烟行为的影响。方法:介入研究。考虑2007-2008学年马尼萨市中心三名不同的高中生继续他们的对照组(n=1737,参与率89.6),2008-2009学年继续他们的高中的同一学生干预组(n=1787,参与度81.0),比较吸烟数据。共有150名同伴志愿者(5组,30人,三期教育),同伴教育者向朋友提供了预防吸烟的培训和支持。比较吸烟和吸烟试验干预组与对照组的发生率。采用卡方检验和逻辑回归分析对SPSS for Windows 10.0软件进行评价。结果:对照组从不吸烟的青年吸烟发生率为3.2%,干预组为2.9%(p=0.547)。在既往尝试吸烟的患者中,对照组发生率为6.3%,干预组9.4%(p=0.069)。干预组和对照组吸烟率分别为72.2%和71.3%,-81.8%和77.9%,经常饮酒者(p=0.369)在前一年试验中,从未吸烟的对照组年轻人的吸烟发生率为3.2%,干预组为3.9%(p=0.397)。应扩大样本量,并对同伴教育计划对吸烟预防期的影响进行更长时间的随访。关键词:吸烟,同伴教育,吸烟,经常吸烟,尝试吸烟
Gençlerde sigaradan korunma konusunda akran eğitimi programının etkinliği
Ozet Amac: Sigaradan korunmada genclere yonelik egitim programlari onemlidir. Calismada genclerde akran egitimi programinin sigara icme davranisi uzerindeki etkisini degerlendirmeyi amaclamaktadir. Yontem: Girisimsel tiptedir. Manisa Kent Merkezinde uc farkli liseye 2007-2008 egitim-ogretim yilinda devam eden ogrenciler kontrol grubu (n= 1737, katilim yuzdesi 89,6), ayni liselere 2008-2009 yilinda devam eden ogrenciler girisim grubu (n=1787, katilim yuzdesi 81,0) olarak ele alinmis, sigara icme verileri karsilastirilmistir. Girisim, 2008-2009 egitim ogretim yilinda akran egitimi programi seklinde uygulanmistir. Toplam 150 akran egiticisine egitimler verilmis (30’ar kisilik 5 grup, 3 seans egitim), akran egiticileri arkadaslarina sigaradan korunma konusunda egitim ve destek vermislerdir. Veriler Mayis 2008 ve Mayis 2009’da uygulanan ogrencilerin doldurdugu anketlerle toplanmistir. Girisim ve kontrol gruplarinin sigara icme ve sigarayi deneme insidanslari karsilastirilmistir. Veriler SPSS for Windows 10.0 istatistik paket programinda ki kare testi ve lojistik regresyon analizi ile degerlendirilmistir. Bulgular: Hic sigara icmemis olan genclerde sigara icme insidansi kontrol grubunda %3,2, girisim grubunda %2,9’dur (p=0,547). Onceki yil sigarayi denemis olanlarda sigara icme insidansi kontrol grubunda %6,3, girisim grubunda %9,4’dur (p=0,069). Sigara icme orani girisim ve kontrol gruplarinda sirasiyla olmak uzere onceki yil duzensiz icicilerde %72,2 ve %71,3 (p=0,876), onceki yil duzenli icicilerde %81,8 ve %77,9’dur (p=0,369). Onceki yil hic sigara icmemis olan genclerde sigarayi deneme insidansi kontrol grubunda %3,2, girisim grubunda %3,9 (p=0,397)’dur. Sonuc: Calismada akran egitimi programinin genclerin sigara icme davranisi uzerinde etkili olmadigi saptanmistir. Bu konuda daha buyuk gruplarda, uzun izlem donemi olan, akran egiticilerinin populer gencler arasindan secildigi programlarin yurutulerek etkinligin degerlendirilmesi onerilmektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Sigara, akran egitimi, sigara icme, sigarayi deneme. The effectiveness of the peer education program on smoking control among young people Abstract Objective :This study was planned to evaluate the impact of the peer education program on smoking behavior. Method: Interventional study. City Center of Manisa in the academic year 2007-2008 in three different high school students who continue their control group (n=1737, participation rate 89.6), the same students who continue their high schools in 2008-2009 i ntervention group (n=1787, participation rate 81,0) is considered, smoking data were compared. There were 150 peer volunteers in total (5 groups of 30 people, three sessions of education), training and support on smoking prevention peer educators gave to friends. The incidences of smoking and smoking trial intervention and control groups were compared. SPSS for Windows 10.0 program was evaluated by chi-square test and logistic regression analysis. Results: The incidence of smoking among youth in the control group who never smoked, 3.2%, 2.9% in the intervention group (p=0.547). Tried cigarette smoking in patients with previous years, the incidence of 6.3% in control group, 9.4% in the intervention group (p=0.069). Smoking rate in the intervention and control groups, 72.2% and 71.3% the previous year, irregular smokers (p=0.876), 81.8% and 77.9% the previous year, regular drinkers (p=0.369) Previous year trial the incidence of smoking among young people in the control group who had never smoked 3.2%, 3.9% in the intervention group (p=0.397). Conclusion: Peer volunteers’ education programme on smoking prevention has a limited effect on smoking prevention. Larger sample size and with longer follow up on impact of peer educational programmes on smoking prevention period should be carried out. Key Words: Smoking, peer education, smoking, regular smokers, try smoking