腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术难度:考虑机器学习平台在临床实践中的作用

Isaac Tranter-Entwistle, T. Eglinton, S. Connor, T. Hugh
{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术难度:考虑机器学习平台在临床实践中的作用","authors":"Isaac Tranter-Entwistle, T. Eglinton, S. Connor, T. Hugh","doi":"10.20517/ais.2022.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Computer vision is a subset of machine learning (ML) technology that allows automated analysis of large operative video datasets. The aim of this study was to use a commercially available ML-driven platform to evaluate a subjective grading of operative difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods: Patients undergoing LC prospectively consented, and their operations were recorded. The intra-operative findings were prospectively graded (1-4) based on intraoperative gallbladder appearance assessments. Deidentified videos were uploaded to Touch SurgeryTMand run through the platform’s algorithm, providing automated analytics including the total operative length and operative phase length. The rate of critical view of safety (CVS) achievement was also included in the analysis. Results: 206 LC were included. 27 LC were excluded due to incomplete video recording and were therefore not amenable to the final data analysis. Grade 1 and 2 patients had significantly shorter operative time than grade 3 and 4 patients [17min and 53s (IQR 15min and 24s- 21min and 38s) vs. 25 min and 49s (IQR 20min and 12s-38min and 38s) (P < 0.010)]. The operative phases for each step were significantly longer in patients with gallbladders graded 3 or 4 compared to those patients graded 1 or 2 (P < 0.043). The CVS was achieved in 94% of grade 1 patients, 88% of grade 2 patients, 85% of grade 3 patients and 73% of grade 4 patients (P = 0.177). Conclusion: Increased operative time and decreased ability to achieve the CVS with more difficult intraoperative findings supports the utility of the proposed grading system. ML in surgery is a nascent field, but this study demonstrates the potential of commercially available platforms for use in operative analytics, documentation, audit and training of future surgeons.","PeriodicalId":72305,"journal":{"name":"Artificial intelligence surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operative difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: considering the role of machine learning platforms in clinical practice\",\"authors\":\"Isaac Tranter-Entwistle, T. Eglinton, S. Connor, T. Hugh\",\"doi\":\"10.20517/ais.2022.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Computer vision is a subset of machine learning (ML) technology that allows automated analysis of large operative video datasets. The aim of this study was to use a commercially available ML-driven platform to evaluate a subjective grading of operative difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods: Patients undergoing LC prospectively consented, and their operations were recorded. The intra-operative findings were prospectively graded (1-4) based on intraoperative gallbladder appearance assessments. Deidentified videos were uploaded to Touch SurgeryTMand run through the platform’s algorithm, providing automated analytics including the total operative length and operative phase length. The rate of critical view of safety (CVS) achievement was also included in the analysis. Results: 206 LC were included. 27 LC were excluded due to incomplete video recording and were therefore not amenable to the final data analysis. Grade 1 and 2 patients had significantly shorter operative time than grade 3 and 4 patients [17min and 53s (IQR 15min and 24s- 21min and 38s) vs. 25 min and 49s (IQR 20min and 12s-38min and 38s) (P < 0.010)]. The operative phases for each step were significantly longer in patients with gallbladders graded 3 or 4 compared to those patients graded 1 or 2 (P < 0.043). The CVS was achieved in 94% of grade 1 patients, 88% of grade 2 patients, 85% of grade 3 patients and 73% of grade 4 patients (P = 0.177). Conclusion: Increased operative time and decreased ability to achieve the CVS with more difficult intraoperative findings supports the utility of the proposed grading system. ML in surgery is a nascent field, but this study demonstrates the potential of commercially available platforms for use in operative analytics, documentation, audit and training of future surgeons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial intelligence surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial intelligence surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20517/ais.2022.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial intelligence surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/ais.2022.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:计算机视觉是机器学习(ML)技术的一个子集,它允许对大型操作视频数据集进行自动分析。本研究的目的是使用市售的机器学习驱动平台来评估腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)手术难度的主观评分。方法:前瞻性同意行LC的患者,记录其手术情况。术中发现根据术中胆囊外观评估进行前瞻性分级(1-4)。经过识别的视频被上传到Touch surgical tmd,并通过平台的算法运行,提供包括总手术长度和手术阶段长度在内的自动分析。安全评价(CVS)完成率也包括在分析中。结果:共纳入206个LC。27个LC因视频记录不完整而被排除,因此无法进行最终数据分析。1级和2级患者的手术时间明显短于3级和4级患者[17min和53s (IQR 15min和24s- 21min和38s)比25min和49s (IQR 20min和12s-38min和38s),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.010)]。胆囊分级为3级或4级的患者比分级为1级或2级的患者每一步的手术期均明显延长(P < 0.043)。94%的1级患者、88%的2级患者、85%的3级患者和73%的4级患者达到了CVS (P = 0.177)。结论:手术时间的增加和达到CVS的能力的下降以及术中更困难的发现支持了所提出的分级系统的实用性。机器学习在外科手术中是一个新兴领域,但这项研究证明了商业平台在手术分析、文件记录、审计和培训未来外科医生方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Operative difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: considering the role of machine learning platforms in clinical practice
Aim: Computer vision is a subset of machine learning (ML) technology that allows automated analysis of large operative video datasets. The aim of this study was to use a commercially available ML-driven platform to evaluate a subjective grading of operative difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods: Patients undergoing LC prospectively consented, and their operations were recorded. The intra-operative findings were prospectively graded (1-4) based on intraoperative gallbladder appearance assessments. Deidentified videos were uploaded to Touch SurgeryTMand run through the platform’s algorithm, providing automated analytics including the total operative length and operative phase length. The rate of critical view of safety (CVS) achievement was also included in the analysis. Results: 206 LC were included. 27 LC were excluded due to incomplete video recording and were therefore not amenable to the final data analysis. Grade 1 and 2 patients had significantly shorter operative time than grade 3 and 4 patients [17min and 53s (IQR 15min and 24s- 21min and 38s) vs. 25 min and 49s (IQR 20min and 12s-38min and 38s) (P < 0.010)]. The operative phases for each step were significantly longer in patients with gallbladders graded 3 or 4 compared to those patients graded 1 or 2 (P < 0.043). The CVS was achieved in 94% of grade 1 patients, 88% of grade 2 patients, 85% of grade 3 patients and 73% of grade 4 patients (P = 0.177). Conclusion: Increased operative time and decreased ability to achieve the CVS with more difficult intraoperative findings supports the utility of the proposed grading system. ML in surgery is a nascent field, but this study demonstrates the potential of commercially available platforms for use in operative analytics, documentation, audit and training of future surgeons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信