高等院校自我评估:文献分析与研究机会

Q4 Social Sciences
Francisca Goedert Heiderscheidt, F. Forcellini
{"title":"高等院校自我评估:文献分析与研究机会","authors":"Francisca Goedert Heiderscheidt, F. Forcellini","doi":"10.1590/s1678-4634202349248924eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Self-assessment in higher education institutions is a topic of increasing interest for the academic community, researchers, the government, and society. This process allows us to map the reality of the institution, becoming the foundation for proposing improvement actions. Self-assessment offers the potential to manage changes if they are considered in decision-making; universities, however, have difficulty using self-assessment as an management instrument; the step-by-step of this process and the use of its results are not effectively presented in the literature. Thus, this study aims to analyze the guidelines for self-assessment methods in higher education institutions, considering their processes, results, and effectiveness. The analysis of previously proposed attributes help to present the potential for developing a better practice in this area. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in several databases, including the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations. A total of 119 documents, relevant to this research were found, in which 62 presented some guideline that considered planning and management for decision-making. These guidelines may be considered as a possible systematic approach for institutional self-assessment. Additionally, research gaps were identified, supporting the appointment of opportunities for researchers and managers within the scope of process management, work routine, and human resources.","PeriodicalId":35419,"journal":{"name":"Educacao e Pesquisa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-assessment in higher education institutions: literature analysis and research opportunities\",\"authors\":\"Francisca Goedert Heiderscheidt, F. Forcellini\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s1678-4634202349248924eng\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Self-assessment in higher education institutions is a topic of increasing interest for the academic community, researchers, the government, and society. This process allows us to map the reality of the institution, becoming the foundation for proposing improvement actions. Self-assessment offers the potential to manage changes if they are considered in decision-making; universities, however, have difficulty using self-assessment as an management instrument; the step-by-step of this process and the use of its results are not effectively presented in the literature. Thus, this study aims to analyze the guidelines for self-assessment methods in higher education institutions, considering their processes, results, and effectiveness. The analysis of previously proposed attributes help to present the potential for developing a better practice in this area. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in several databases, including the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations. A total of 119 documents, relevant to this research were found, in which 62 presented some guideline that considered planning and management for decision-making. These guidelines may be considered as a possible systematic approach for institutional self-assessment. Additionally, research gaps were identified, supporting the appointment of opportunities for researchers and managers within the scope of process management, work routine, and human resources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educacao e Pesquisa\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educacao e Pesquisa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-4634202349248924eng\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacao e Pesquisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-4634202349248924eng","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高等院校自我评估是学术界、研究人员、政府和社会日益关注的一个话题。这个过程使我们能够描绘出机构的现实,成为提出改进行动的基础。如果在决策时考虑到自我评价,就有可能管理变化;然而,大学很难将自我评估作为一种管理手段;这个过程的一步一步和使用它的结果没有有效地呈现在文献中。因此,本研究旨在分析高等院校自我评估方法的指导方针,从其过程、结果和有效性三个方面进行分析。对先前提出的属性的分析有助于展示在该领域开发更好实践的潜力。在几个数据库中对文献进行了系统的回顾,包括巴西论文和学位论文数字图书馆。共发现119份与这项研究有关的文件,其中62份提出了一些考虑决策规划和管理的准则。这些准则可被视为机构自我评估的一种可能的系统方法。此外,研究差距被确定,支持在过程管理、工作常规和人力资源范围内为研究人员和管理人员任命机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-assessment in higher education institutions: literature analysis and research opportunities
Abstract Self-assessment in higher education institutions is a topic of increasing interest for the academic community, researchers, the government, and society. This process allows us to map the reality of the institution, becoming the foundation for proposing improvement actions. Self-assessment offers the potential to manage changes if they are considered in decision-making; universities, however, have difficulty using self-assessment as an management instrument; the step-by-step of this process and the use of its results are not effectively presented in the literature. Thus, this study aims to analyze the guidelines for self-assessment methods in higher education institutions, considering their processes, results, and effectiveness. The analysis of previously proposed attributes help to present the potential for developing a better practice in this area. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in several databases, including the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations. A total of 119 documents, relevant to this research were found, in which 62 presented some guideline that considered planning and management for decision-making. These guidelines may be considered as a possible systematic approach for institutional self-assessment. Additionally, research gaps were identified, supporting the appointment of opportunities for researchers and managers within the scope of process management, work routine, and human resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educacao e Pesquisa
Educacao e Pesquisa Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: EDUCAÇÃO E PESQUISA é uma publicação quadrimestral da Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo – FEUSP. Publicada desde 1975, a revista aceita artigos em português, francês, espanhol e inglês. Publica artigos inéditos na área de educação, em especial resultados de pesquisa de caráter teórico ou empírico, revisões da literatura de pesquisa educacional e reflexões críticas sobre experiências pedagógicas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信