模态逻辑中波特规则的观察

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Bulletin of the Section of Logic Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.18778/0138-0680.44.1.2.04

Rohan French, L. Humberstone

{"title":"模态逻辑中波特规则的观察","authors":"Rohan French, L. Humberstone","doi":"10.18778/0138-0680.44.1.2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that no consistent normal modal logic contains (as theorems) both ◊A and ◊¬A (for any formula A). Here we observe that this claim can be strengthened to the following: for any formula A, either no consistent normal modal logic contains ◊A, or else no consistent normal modal logic contains ◊¬A.","PeriodicalId":38667,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Section of Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Observation Concerning Porte’s Rule in Modal Logic\",\"authors\":\"Rohan French, L. Humberstone\",\"doi\":\"10.18778/0138-0680.44.1.2.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well known that no consistent normal modal logic contains (as theorems) both ◊A and ◊¬A (for any formula A). Here we observe that this claim can be strengthened to the following: for any formula A, either no consistent normal modal logic contains ◊A, or else no consistent normal modal logic contains ◊¬A.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Section of Logic\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Section of Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18778/0138-0680.44.1.2.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Section of Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/0138-0680.44.1.2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

众所周知，没有一致的正态模态逻辑(作为定理)同时包含- A和- α(对于任何公式A)。在这里，我们观察到这一论断可以加强为:对于任何公式A，要么没有一致的正态模态逻辑包含- α，要么没有一致的正态模态逻辑包含- α。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

An Observation Concerning Porte’s Rule in Modal Logic

It is well known that no consistent normal modal logic contains (as theorems) both ◊A and ◊¬A (for any formula A). Here we observe that this claim can be strengthened to the following: for any formula A, either no consistent normal modal logic contains ◊A, or else no consistent normal modal logic contains ◊¬A.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Bulletin of the Section of Logic Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

8 weeks