神经behaperet病的临床特征、诊断和鉴别诊断

Q4 Medicine
S. Ozyurt, P. Sfikakis, A. Siva, C. Constantinescu
{"title":"神经behaperet病的临床特征、诊断和鉴别诊断","authors":"S. Ozyurt, P. Sfikakis, A. Siva, C. Constantinescu","doi":"10.17925/ENR.2018.13.2.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Behçet’s disease is a relatively uncommon, inflammatory disorder with characteristic mucocutaneous lesions and multisystem involvement, of unknown aetiology; presumably a vascular autoinflammatory syndrome that develops under combined environmental and genetic influences. As neuro-Behçet’s disease affects the central nervous system in about 10% of cases and in ways that can mimic other neuroinflammatory conditions, awareness of its manifestations, significance, and management is important for neurologists. In March 2017, a mini-symposium at the 11th Congress of Controversies in Neurology in Athens, Greece, was dedicated to specific aspects of Behçet’s and neuro-Behçet’s disease. These included an introduction to Behçet’s disease, pathogenesis and treatment, an overview of its neurological manifestations (neuro-Behçet’s disease) and the differential diagnosis from other neuroinflammatory conditions. Illustrative case reports were used. Objectives: To provide a brief overview of neuro-Behçet’s disease that is informative for clinical neurological practice and that follows the structure of the 2017 mini-symposium. Data sources: Relevant recent comprehensive reviews of the subject and relevant original articles and case reports were provided by each speaker at the mini-symposium. This article contains some of these sources and some additions where necessary to emphasise specific points. References are also provided for more comprehensive recent reviews. Limitations: The mini-symposium was an opportunity for providing a brief update and overview of neuro-Behçet’s disease and to exchange ideas and experience among neurologists. As such, it was found to be helpful, but also limited in scope. This resultant article refers to comprehensive reviews on the topic but is not in itself a comprehensive systematic review. Conclusions: Neuro-Bechet’s disease comprises largely two forms, parenchymal and a non-parenchymal. These manifestations seldom overlap in the same individual and may reflect different pathogenetic mechanisms. The principles of treatment largely follow the principles of treating Bechet’s disease in general, with the mainstay being corticosteroids for exacerbations and immunosuppressive treatments for prevention of exacerbations. One notable exception is cyclosporine, which is typically avoided in neuro-Bechet’s disease. Anti-tumour necrosis factor biologicals play an increasing role in treatment. Distinguishing neuro-Behçet’s disease from other neuroinflammatory conditions, such as multiple sclerosis, is essential for both management and prognostic reasons.","PeriodicalId":12047,"journal":{"name":"European neurological review","volume":"13 1","pages":"93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuro-Behçet’s Disease – Clinical Features, Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"S. Ozyurt, P. Sfikakis, A. Siva, C. Constantinescu\",\"doi\":\"10.17925/ENR.2018.13.2.93\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Behçet’s disease is a relatively uncommon, inflammatory disorder with characteristic mucocutaneous lesions and multisystem involvement, of unknown aetiology; presumably a vascular autoinflammatory syndrome that develops under combined environmental and genetic influences. As neuro-Behçet’s disease affects the central nervous system in about 10% of cases and in ways that can mimic other neuroinflammatory conditions, awareness of its manifestations, significance, and management is important for neurologists. In March 2017, a mini-symposium at the 11th Congress of Controversies in Neurology in Athens, Greece, was dedicated to specific aspects of Behçet’s and neuro-Behçet’s disease. These included an introduction to Behçet’s disease, pathogenesis and treatment, an overview of its neurological manifestations (neuro-Behçet’s disease) and the differential diagnosis from other neuroinflammatory conditions. Illustrative case reports were used. Objectives: To provide a brief overview of neuro-Behçet’s disease that is informative for clinical neurological practice and that follows the structure of the 2017 mini-symposium. Data sources: Relevant recent comprehensive reviews of the subject and relevant original articles and case reports were provided by each speaker at the mini-symposium. This article contains some of these sources and some additions where necessary to emphasise specific points. References are also provided for more comprehensive recent reviews. Limitations: The mini-symposium was an opportunity for providing a brief update and overview of neuro-Behçet’s disease and to exchange ideas and experience among neurologists. As such, it was found to be helpful, but also limited in scope. This resultant article refers to comprehensive reviews on the topic but is not in itself a comprehensive systematic review. Conclusions: Neuro-Bechet’s disease comprises largely two forms, parenchymal and a non-parenchymal. These manifestations seldom overlap in the same individual and may reflect different pathogenetic mechanisms. The principles of treatment largely follow the principles of treating Bechet’s disease in general, with the mainstay being corticosteroids for exacerbations and immunosuppressive treatments for prevention of exacerbations. One notable exception is cyclosporine, which is typically avoided in neuro-Bechet’s disease. Anti-tumour necrosis factor biologicals play an increasing role in treatment. Distinguishing neuro-Behçet’s disease from other neuroinflammatory conditions, such as multiple sclerosis, is essential for both management and prognostic reasons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European neurological review\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European neurological review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17925/ENR.2018.13.2.93\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European neurological review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/ENR.2018.13.2.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:behet病是一种相对罕见的炎性疾病,以皮肤粘膜病变为特征,累及多系统,病因不明;推测是在环境和遗传共同影响下形成的血管自身炎症综合征。由于神经behet病在约10%的病例中影响中枢神经系统,并且以类似于其他神经炎症的方式影响中枢神经系统,因此对神经科医生来说,了解其表现、意义和管理非常重要。2017年3月,在希腊雅典举行的第11届神经病学争议大会上,一个小型研讨会专门讨论了behet病和神经behet病的具体方面。其中包括介绍behet病、发病机制和治疗,概述其神经系统表现(神经behet病)以及与其他神经炎症的鉴别诊断。采用说明性病例报告。目的:提供神经behaperet病的简要概述,为临床神经学实践提供信息,并遵循2017年小型研讨会的结构。数据来源:本次小型研讨会的每位演讲者都提供了有关该主题的近期综合评论以及相关的原创文章和病例报告。本文包含了其中的一些来源和一些必要的补充,以强调特定的点。还提供了更全面的近期评论的参考资料。局限性:这次小型研讨会提供了一个简要更新和概述神经behaperet病的机会,并在神经科医生之间交流思想和经验。因此,它被认为是有帮助的,但范围也有限。由此产生的文章涉及对该主题的全面评论,但本身并不是一个全面的系统评论。结论:神经bechet病主要包括实质性和非实质性两种形式。这些表现很少在同一个体中重叠,可能反映不同的发病机制。治疗原则在很大程度上遵循一般治疗Bechet病的原则,主要是治疗加重的皮质类固醇和预防加重的免疫抑制治疗。一个值得注意的例外是环孢素,它通常避免用于神经-贝克特病。抗肿瘤坏死因子生物制剂在治疗中发挥着越来越重要的作用。将神经behet病与其他神经炎性疾病(如多发性硬化症)区分开来,对于治疗和预后都是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuro-Behçet’s Disease – Clinical Features, Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis
Background: Behçet’s disease is a relatively uncommon, inflammatory disorder with characteristic mucocutaneous lesions and multisystem involvement, of unknown aetiology; presumably a vascular autoinflammatory syndrome that develops under combined environmental and genetic influences. As neuro-Behçet’s disease affects the central nervous system in about 10% of cases and in ways that can mimic other neuroinflammatory conditions, awareness of its manifestations, significance, and management is important for neurologists. In March 2017, a mini-symposium at the 11th Congress of Controversies in Neurology in Athens, Greece, was dedicated to specific aspects of Behçet’s and neuro-Behçet’s disease. These included an introduction to Behçet’s disease, pathogenesis and treatment, an overview of its neurological manifestations (neuro-Behçet’s disease) and the differential diagnosis from other neuroinflammatory conditions. Illustrative case reports were used. Objectives: To provide a brief overview of neuro-Behçet’s disease that is informative for clinical neurological practice and that follows the structure of the 2017 mini-symposium. Data sources: Relevant recent comprehensive reviews of the subject and relevant original articles and case reports were provided by each speaker at the mini-symposium. This article contains some of these sources and some additions where necessary to emphasise specific points. References are also provided for more comprehensive recent reviews. Limitations: The mini-symposium was an opportunity for providing a brief update and overview of neuro-Behçet’s disease and to exchange ideas and experience among neurologists. As such, it was found to be helpful, but also limited in scope. This resultant article refers to comprehensive reviews on the topic but is not in itself a comprehensive systematic review. Conclusions: Neuro-Bechet’s disease comprises largely two forms, parenchymal and a non-parenchymal. These manifestations seldom overlap in the same individual and may reflect different pathogenetic mechanisms. The principles of treatment largely follow the principles of treating Bechet’s disease in general, with the mainstay being corticosteroids for exacerbations and immunosuppressive treatments for prevention of exacerbations. One notable exception is cyclosporine, which is typically avoided in neuro-Bechet’s disease. Anti-tumour necrosis factor biologicals play an increasing role in treatment. Distinguishing neuro-Behçet’s disease from other neuroinflammatory conditions, such as multiple sclerosis, is essential for both management and prognostic reasons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European neurological review
European neurological review Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信