热带酸性土壤nbpt处理尿素氨挥发动态

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
J. Soares, H. Cantarella
{"title":"热带酸性土壤nbpt处理尿素氨挥发动态","authors":"J. Soares, H. Cantarella","doi":"10.1590/1678-992x-2022-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) reduces NH 3 losses from urea (UR) surface-applied to soils, but its efficacy may be lower in acidic soils. The period when urease inhibition occurs efficaciously may change with soil pH. This needs to be clarified in tropical soils which are commonly acidic. This study evaluated the effectiveness of NBPT-treated urea to delay and reduce ammonia volatilization in two soils at three pH levels. Two experiments were conducted under laboratory conditions in soils with different textures (sandy-clay and clay). The treatments consisted of three soil pH levels and two N sources (UR and UR + NBPT), with five replicates. The soil pH values were adjusted and reached values of 4.5, 5.6, and 6.4 in the sandy-clay, and 4.5, 5.4, and 6.1 in the clay soil. Ammonia volatilization was measured using glass chambers (1.5 L). In the sandy-clay soil, NH 3 losses were 40-47 % of the UR-N. In the clay soil, losses were 26-32 %. The addition of NBPT to UR reduced the NH 3 volatilization by 18-53 %; the inhibitor decreased the N losses under all soil pH conditions but was significantly less efficient in acidic soils (pH 4.5). The lower efficiency of the inhibitor under acidic conditions was more evident in the first few days: 50 % of the total NH 3 losses occurred in less than four days in soils with pH 4.5, but in 8-11 days in soils with pH above 5.4. The rapid loss in efficiency in more acidic soils is a drawback. Using NBPT in severely acidic soils showed a relatively small advantage over untreated UR as the inhibitor did not provide extra time for fertilizer incorporation and further reduction of NH 3 losses.","PeriodicalId":49559,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Agricola","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamics of ammonia volatilization from NBPT-treated urea in tropical acid soils\",\"authors\":\"J. Soares, H. Cantarella\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1678-992x-2022-0076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": The urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) reduces NH 3 losses from urea (UR) surface-applied to soils, but its efficacy may be lower in acidic soils. The period when urease inhibition occurs efficaciously may change with soil pH. This needs to be clarified in tropical soils which are commonly acidic. This study evaluated the effectiveness of NBPT-treated urea to delay and reduce ammonia volatilization in two soils at three pH levels. Two experiments were conducted under laboratory conditions in soils with different textures (sandy-clay and clay). The treatments consisted of three soil pH levels and two N sources (UR and UR + NBPT), with five replicates. The soil pH values were adjusted and reached values of 4.5, 5.6, and 6.4 in the sandy-clay, and 4.5, 5.4, and 6.1 in the clay soil. Ammonia volatilization was measured using glass chambers (1.5 L). In the sandy-clay soil, NH 3 losses were 40-47 % of the UR-N. In the clay soil, losses were 26-32 %. The addition of NBPT to UR reduced the NH 3 volatilization by 18-53 %; the inhibitor decreased the N losses under all soil pH conditions but was significantly less efficient in acidic soils (pH 4.5). The lower efficiency of the inhibitor under acidic conditions was more evident in the first few days: 50 % of the total NH 3 losses occurred in less than four days in soils with pH 4.5, but in 8-11 days in soils with pH above 5.4. The rapid loss in efficiency in more acidic soils is a drawback. Using NBPT in severely acidic soils showed a relatively small advantage over untreated UR as the inhibitor did not provide extra time for fertilizer incorporation and further reduction of NH 3 losses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientia Agricola\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientia Agricola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2022-0076\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Agricola","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2022-0076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脲酶抑制剂N-(正丁基)硫磷三酰胺(NBPT)可减少尿素(UR)在土壤表面的nh3损失,但其在酸性土壤中的效果可能较低。脲酶有效抑制的时间可能随着土壤ph值的变化而变化。在热带土壤中,这一点需要澄清,因为热带土壤通常是酸性的。本研究评估了nbpt处理的尿素在三种pH水平下延缓和减少氨挥发的有效性。在室内条件下,对不同质地的土(砂质粘土和粘土)进行了两项试验。3个土壤pH水平和2个氮源(UR和UR + NBPT)处理,5个重复。调整土壤pH值,砂质粘土达到4.5、5.6和6.4,粘土达到4.5、5.4和6.1。氨挥发用玻璃室(1.5 L)测定。在砂质粘土中,nh3损失为UR-N的40- 47%。在粘土中,损失率为26- 32%。在UR中添加NBPT可使nh3挥发减少18- 53%;在所有土壤pH条件下,该缓蚀剂均能降低氮素损失,但在酸性土壤(pH为4.5)中效果明显较差。在酸性条件下,缓蚀剂的低效率在前几天表现得更为明显:在pH为4.5的土壤中,50%的NH 3总损失在不到4天内发生,而在pH高于5.4的土壤中,则在8-11天内发生。在酸性较强的土壤中,效率的迅速丧失是一个缺点。在严重酸性土壤中使用NBPT比未处理的UR表现出相对较小的优势,因为抑制剂没有提供额外的施肥时间和进一步减少nh3损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamics of ammonia volatilization from NBPT-treated urea in tropical acid soils
: The urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) reduces NH 3 losses from urea (UR) surface-applied to soils, but its efficacy may be lower in acidic soils. The period when urease inhibition occurs efficaciously may change with soil pH. This needs to be clarified in tropical soils which are commonly acidic. This study evaluated the effectiveness of NBPT-treated urea to delay and reduce ammonia volatilization in two soils at three pH levels. Two experiments were conducted under laboratory conditions in soils with different textures (sandy-clay and clay). The treatments consisted of three soil pH levels and two N sources (UR and UR + NBPT), with five replicates. The soil pH values were adjusted and reached values of 4.5, 5.6, and 6.4 in the sandy-clay, and 4.5, 5.4, and 6.1 in the clay soil. Ammonia volatilization was measured using glass chambers (1.5 L). In the sandy-clay soil, NH 3 losses were 40-47 % of the UR-N. In the clay soil, losses were 26-32 %. The addition of NBPT to UR reduced the NH 3 volatilization by 18-53 %; the inhibitor decreased the N losses under all soil pH conditions but was significantly less efficient in acidic soils (pH 4.5). The lower efficiency of the inhibitor under acidic conditions was more evident in the first few days: 50 % of the total NH 3 losses occurred in less than four days in soils with pH 4.5, but in 8-11 days in soils with pH above 5.4. The rapid loss in efficiency in more acidic soils is a drawback. Using NBPT in severely acidic soils showed a relatively small advantage over untreated UR as the inhibitor did not provide extra time for fertilizer incorporation and further reduction of NH 3 losses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientia Agricola
Scientia Agricola 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
78
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Scientia Agricola is a journal of the University of São Paulo edited at the Luiz de Queiroz campus in Piracicaba, a city in São Paulo state, southeastern Brazil. Scientia Agricola publishes original articles which contribute to the advancement of the agricultural, environmental and biological sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信