{"title":"卡勒姆·卡迈克尔:《民数记:创世纪批判》，纽黑文，耶鲁大学出版社，2012年","authors":"J. Stiebert","doi":"10.2104/BCT.V12I2.668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is the third monograph in which Carmichael makes the case that what appear to be laws in the Torah are best thought of as corrective commentary in response to problems (mostly of an ethical or cultic kind) in the narratives of Genesis–2 Kings (but Genesis in particular). Whereas the two earlier volumes (Carmichael 1997 and 2006) focus on Leviticus, this one is concerned primarily with Numbers, “the least researched of the books that make up the Pentateuch, [which] presents a puzzling combination of law and narrative” (vii).","PeriodicalId":53382,"journal":{"name":"The Bible and Critical Theory","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Calum Carmichael, The Book of Numbers: A Critique of Genesis, New Haven, Yale University Press, 2012\",\"authors\":\"J. Stiebert\",\"doi\":\"10.2104/BCT.V12I2.668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is the third monograph in which Carmichael makes the case that what appear to be laws in the Torah are best thought of as corrective commentary in response to problems (mostly of an ethical or cultic kind) in the narratives of Genesis–2 Kings (but Genesis in particular). Whereas the two earlier volumes (Carmichael 1997 and 2006) focus on Leviticus, this one is concerned primarily with Numbers, “the least researched of the books that make up the Pentateuch, [which] presents a puzzling combination of law and narrative” (vii).\",\"PeriodicalId\":53382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bible and Critical Theory\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bible and Critical Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2104/BCT.V12I2.668\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bible and Critical Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2104/BCT.V12I2.668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Review of Calum Carmichael, The Book of Numbers: A Critique of Genesis, New Haven, Yale University Press, 2012
This is the third monograph in which Carmichael makes the case that what appear to be laws in the Torah are best thought of as corrective commentary in response to problems (mostly of an ethical or cultic kind) in the narratives of Genesis–2 Kings (but Genesis in particular). Whereas the two earlier volumes (Carmichael 1997 and 2006) focus on Leviticus, this one is concerned primarily with Numbers, “the least researched of the books that make up the Pentateuch, [which] presents a puzzling combination of law and narrative” (vii).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
