费多尔·伊万诺夫作为论文《论敌基督先知的知识》的作者:赞成与反对

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Alexander V. Zagumennov
{"title":"费多尔·伊万诺夫作为论文《论敌基督先知的知识》的作者:赞成与反对","authors":"Alexander V. Zagumennov","doi":"10.17223/18137083/82/5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes the work “On the Knowledge of Antichrist Prelest (Delusion)” that has been attributed to Fedor Ivanov so far. Fedor Ivanov was the ideologist of the Old Believers, condemned at the Moscow Cathedral in the 1666–1667 years and executed in Pustozersk in 1682 together with Archpriest Avvakum, priest Lazar, and monk Epiphanius. A twofold argument is offered that the text in question does not correspond either to Fyodor Ivanov’s manner of constructing the statement or to his understanding of the theological topics. The approach applied is based on phenomenological philosophy and philological hermeneutics. The main linguistic methods are description, comparison and contrast, and contextual analysis. First, a text fragment with an internal rhyme was selected and compared with other documents of Fedor Ivanov in terms of internal rhyme. The arithmetic mean of the number of components “from comma to comma” in the text analyzed has been revealed not to be characteristic of the writing style of the Old Believers’ ideologue. Second, the interpretation of the Antichrist in the text concerned was compared with that in the “Epistle to All Orthodox about Antichrist.” A discrepancy was revealed that cannot result from the author’s changing the target setting. Finally, a conclusion is made that the essay “On the Knowledge of Antichrist Prelest” was not created by Fedor Ivanov.","PeriodicalId":53939,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fedor Ivanov as the author of the treatise “On the Knowledge of Antichrist’s Prelest”: pro et contra\",\"authors\":\"Alexander V. Zagumennov\",\"doi\":\"10.17223/18137083/82/5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study analyzes the work “On the Knowledge of Antichrist Prelest (Delusion)” that has been attributed to Fedor Ivanov so far. Fedor Ivanov was the ideologist of the Old Believers, condemned at the Moscow Cathedral in the 1666–1667 years and executed in Pustozersk in 1682 together with Archpriest Avvakum, priest Lazar, and monk Epiphanius. A twofold argument is offered that the text in question does not correspond either to Fyodor Ivanov’s manner of constructing the statement or to his understanding of the theological topics. The approach applied is based on phenomenological philosophy and philological hermeneutics. The main linguistic methods are description, comparison and contrast, and contextual analysis. First, a text fragment with an internal rhyme was selected and compared with other documents of Fedor Ivanov in terms of internal rhyme. The arithmetic mean of the number of components “from comma to comma” in the text analyzed has been revealed not to be characteristic of the writing style of the Old Believers’ ideologue. Second, the interpretation of the Antichrist in the text concerned was compared with that in the “Epistle to All Orthodox about Antichrist.” A discrepancy was revealed that cannot result from the author’s changing the target setting. Finally, a conclusion is made that the essay “On the Knowledge of Antichrist Prelest” was not created by Fedor Ivanov.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17223/18137083/82/5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/18137083/82/5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了迄今为止被认为是费多尔·伊万诺夫的作品《论对反基督者的认识(妄想)》。费多尔·伊万诺夫是老信徒派的思想家,1666-1667年间在莫斯科大教堂被判处死刑,1682年在普斯托泽尔斯克与阿瓦库姆大祭司、拉扎尔牧师和修道士埃皮法尼乌斯一起被处决。提出了一个双重论点,即所讨论的文本既不符合费奥多尔伊万诺夫构建声明的方式,也不符合他对神学主题的理解。所采用的方法是基于现象学哲学和语言解释学。主要的语言学方法有描述法、比较对比法和语境分析法。首先,选取了一个具有内韵的文本片段,并与费多尔·伊万诺夫的其他文献在内韵方面进行比较。分析文本中“从逗号到逗号”成分数的算术平均值,揭示了旧信徒意识形态写作风格的特征。其次,将有关文本中对敌基督的解释与“致所有东正教关于敌基督的书信”中的解释进行比较。结果表明,这种差异不可能是作者改变目标设定的结果。最后,本文得出结论:《论敌基督普雷勒斯特的知识》并非由费多尔·伊万诺夫创作的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fedor Ivanov as the author of the treatise “On the Knowledge of Antichrist’s Prelest”: pro et contra
This study analyzes the work “On the Knowledge of Antichrist Prelest (Delusion)” that has been attributed to Fedor Ivanov so far. Fedor Ivanov was the ideologist of the Old Believers, condemned at the Moscow Cathedral in the 1666–1667 years and executed in Pustozersk in 1682 together with Archpriest Avvakum, priest Lazar, and monk Epiphanius. A twofold argument is offered that the text in question does not correspond either to Fyodor Ivanov’s manner of constructing the statement or to his understanding of the theological topics. The approach applied is based on phenomenological philosophy and philological hermeneutics. The main linguistic methods are description, comparison and contrast, and contextual analysis. First, a text fragment with an internal rhyme was selected and compared with other documents of Fedor Ivanov in terms of internal rhyme. The arithmetic mean of the number of components “from comma to comma” in the text analyzed has been revealed not to be characteristic of the writing style of the Old Believers’ ideologue. Second, the interpretation of the Antichrist in the text concerned was compared with that in the “Epistle to All Orthodox about Antichrist.” A discrepancy was revealed that cannot result from the author’s changing the target setting. Finally, a conclusion is made that the essay “On the Knowledge of Antichrist Prelest” was not created by Fedor Ivanov.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal
Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信