谁在巴西在家工作?这一大流行病突出了不平等现象

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Nicole Rennó Castro, G. Moreira
{"title":"谁在巴西在家工作?这一大流行病突出了不平等现象","authors":"Nicole Rennó Castro, G. Moreira","doi":"10.1590/0103-6351/6687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is some consensus that the pandemic can widen pre-existing inequalities in the labor market and that an essential issue concerns the unequal possibilities of working remotely. This study analyzes inequalities in remote work in Brazil through descriptive analyzes and Probit regressions using PNAD COVID-19 microdata. We have found that workers with the least possibilities for remote work were the poorest, males, rural residents, non-whites, youngest, without college education, self-employed or wage workers from the private sector and agriculture workers. An important part of that stems from differences in selection into occupations;however, some variables maintained important independent effects, especially the college education and the labor income. The pandemic, regarding the possibility of remote work, had the effect of widening the existing inequalities, favoring the wealthier, more educated, and more formalized workers and imposing on the others the need to choose between employment and income versus risk of contagion. © 2022, Lundiana. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":35209,"journal":{"name":"Nova Economia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who worked from home in Brazil? Inequalities highlighted by the pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Rennó Castro, G. Moreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-6351/6687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is some consensus that the pandemic can widen pre-existing inequalities in the labor market and that an essential issue concerns the unequal possibilities of working remotely. This study analyzes inequalities in remote work in Brazil through descriptive analyzes and Probit regressions using PNAD COVID-19 microdata. We have found that workers with the least possibilities for remote work were the poorest, males, rural residents, non-whites, youngest, without college education, self-employed or wage workers from the private sector and agriculture workers. An important part of that stems from differences in selection into occupations;however, some variables maintained important independent effects, especially the college education and the labor income. The pandemic, regarding the possibility of remote work, had the effect of widening the existing inequalities, favoring the wealthier, more educated, and more formalized workers and imposing on the others the need to choose between employment and income versus risk of contagion. © 2022, Lundiana. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nova Economia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nova Economia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6351/6687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nova Economia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6351/6687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

有一些共识认为,大流行病可能扩大劳动力市场先前存在的不平等现象,一个根本问题涉及远程工作的不平等可能性。本研究利用PNAD COVID-19微数据,通过描述性分析和Probit回归分析了巴西远程工作中的不平等现象。我们发现,远程工作可能性最小的工人是最贫穷的人、男性、农村居民、非白人、最年轻的人、没有受过大学教育的人、私营部门的自营职业者或受薪工人以及农业工人。其中一个重要部分源于职业选择的差异;然而,一些变量保持了重要的独立影响,尤其是大学教育和劳动收入。就远程工作的可能性而言,大流行病扩大了现有的不平等现象,有利于较富裕、受教育程度较高和较正规的工人,并迫使其他人必须在就业和收入与传染风险之间做出选择。©2022,Lundiana。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who worked from home in Brazil? Inequalities highlighted by the pandemic
There is some consensus that the pandemic can widen pre-existing inequalities in the labor market and that an essential issue concerns the unequal possibilities of working remotely. This study analyzes inequalities in remote work in Brazil through descriptive analyzes and Probit regressions using PNAD COVID-19 microdata. We have found that workers with the least possibilities for remote work were the poorest, males, rural residents, non-whites, youngest, without college education, self-employed or wage workers from the private sector and agriculture workers. An important part of that stems from differences in selection into occupations;however, some variables maintained important independent effects, especially the college education and the labor income. The pandemic, regarding the possibility of remote work, had the effect of widening the existing inequalities, favoring the wealthier, more educated, and more formalized workers and imposing on the others the need to choose between employment and income versus risk of contagion. © 2022, Lundiana. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nova Economia
Nova Economia Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊介绍: Nova Economia is the journal of the Economics Department at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil). It publishes articles and book reviews in all areas of economics and related disciplines. Nova Economia adopts a pluralistic orientation and welcomes papers in all research traditions and theoretical schools. Submisssions are peer-reviewed and scholarly standards are the sole criteria for editorial decisions. Nova Economia is published three times a year and offers free on-line access to the full articles published from 2000 on.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信