菲律宾的科学、规则制定和COVID-19:评估摩托车护罩法规的科学基础

Q4 Social Sciences
Vivencio O. Ballano
{"title":"菲律宾的科学、规则制定和COVID-19:评估摩托车护罩法规的科学基础","authors":"Vivencio O. Ballano","doi":"10.18848/2327-0071/cgp/v17i02/1-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article evaluates the Philippine government’s science-based response to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in the field of administrative rulemaking. Specifically, it evaluates the effectiveness of the Motorcycle Pillion Shield Regulation (MPSR) to implement social distancing and prevent COVID-19 infections in motorcycle back-riding. Applying Max Weber’s view on the necessity of scientific expertise in rulemaking, and using government and media reports, the article analyzes the scientific foundation of the MPSR rulemaking by the Philippine Inter-agency Task Force on Emerging Infectious Disease (IATF-EID) and National Task Force (NTF), the country’s top task forces against COVID-19. It argues that a truly science-based approach to rulemaking must be based on sound scientific evidence and consultation with scientists, experts, interest groups, and the motorcycle riding public, before crafting and implementing regulation. Results showed that the use of the shield in motorcycle back-riding can cause the spread of the virus instead of preventing it, especially in motorcycle taxis. The use of a common helmet and the inevitable physical contact between the driver and the back rider may cause infection if one rider is positive, as scientific studies indicate that touching contaminated surfaces can cause transmission. It is also an added expense, unsafe, and prone to accidents as the shield obstructs the motorcycle’s aerodynamics and balance. Lastly, no comprehensive scientific study and consultations with experts and riders before the MPSR was crafted and implemented by the NTF. Ultimately, this article contends that the government’s claim to a science-based strategy against COVID-19 can remain elusive if it fails to address the country’s lack of a reliable scientific advisory group and if it fails to amend the new Philippine Administrative Code to require regulators to strictly follow sound science in rulemaking.","PeriodicalId":38265,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Interdisciplinary Civic and Political Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science, Rulemaking, and COVID-19 in the Philippines: Evaluating the Scientific Basis of the Motorcycle Pillion Shield Regulation\",\"authors\":\"Vivencio O. Ballano\",\"doi\":\"10.18848/2327-0071/cgp/v17i02/1-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article evaluates the Philippine government’s science-based response to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in the field of administrative rulemaking. Specifically, it evaluates the effectiveness of the Motorcycle Pillion Shield Regulation (MPSR) to implement social distancing and prevent COVID-19 infections in motorcycle back-riding. Applying Max Weber’s view on the necessity of scientific expertise in rulemaking, and using government and media reports, the article analyzes the scientific foundation of the MPSR rulemaking by the Philippine Inter-agency Task Force on Emerging Infectious Disease (IATF-EID) and National Task Force (NTF), the country’s top task forces against COVID-19. It argues that a truly science-based approach to rulemaking must be based on sound scientific evidence and consultation with scientists, experts, interest groups, and the motorcycle riding public, before crafting and implementing regulation. Results showed that the use of the shield in motorcycle back-riding can cause the spread of the virus instead of preventing it, especially in motorcycle taxis. The use of a common helmet and the inevitable physical contact between the driver and the back rider may cause infection if one rider is positive, as scientific studies indicate that touching contaminated surfaces can cause transmission. It is also an added expense, unsafe, and prone to accidents as the shield obstructs the motorcycle’s aerodynamics and balance. Lastly, no comprehensive scientific study and consultations with experts and riders before the MPSR was crafted and implemented by the NTF. Ultimately, this article contends that the government’s claim to a science-based strategy against COVID-19 can remain elusive if it fails to address the country’s lack of a reliable scientific advisory group and if it fails to amend the new Philippine Administrative Code to require regulators to strictly follow sound science in rulemaking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Interdisciplinary Civic and Political Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Interdisciplinary Civic and Political Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0071/cgp/v17i02/1-14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Interdisciplinary Civic and Political Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0071/cgp/v17i02/1-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文评价了菲律宾政府以科学为基础应对新冠肺炎大流行,特别是在行政法规制定领域。具体而言,它评估了《摩托车驾驶座防护条例》(MPSR)在实施社交距离和防止骑摩托车感染COVID-19方面的有效性。本文运用马克斯·韦伯关于制定规则需要科学专业知识的观点,并利用政府和媒体报道,分析了菲律宾新发传染病机构间工作队(IATF-EID)和国家工作队(NTF)制定MPSR规则的科学基础,这是菲律宾应对COVID-19的最高工作队。报告认为,在制定和实施法规之前,真正以科学为基础的规则制定方法必须以可靠的科学证据为基础,并与科学家、专家、利益集团和骑摩托车的公众进行磋商。结果表明,在摩托车后座上使用防护盾不仅不能防止病毒的传播,反而会导致病毒的传播,尤其是在摩的出租车上。如果一名骑手呈阳性,使用普通头盔以及驾驶员和后排骑手之间不可避免的身体接触可能会导致感染,因为科学研究表明,接触受污染的表面会导致传播。这也是一个额外的费用,不安全,并且容易发生事故,因为护罩阻碍了摩托车的空气动力学和平衡。最后,在NTF制定和实施MPSR之前,没有进行全面的科学研究,也没有与专家和车手进行磋商。最后,本文认为,如果政府不能解决该国缺乏可靠的科学咨询小组的问题,如果它不能修改新的菲律宾行政法,要求监管机构在制定规则时严格遵循健全的科学,那么它所声称的以科学为基础的应对COVID-19战略可能仍然难以实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Science, Rulemaking, and COVID-19 in the Philippines: Evaluating the Scientific Basis of the Motorcycle Pillion Shield Regulation
This article evaluates the Philippine government’s science-based response to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in the field of administrative rulemaking. Specifically, it evaluates the effectiveness of the Motorcycle Pillion Shield Regulation (MPSR) to implement social distancing and prevent COVID-19 infections in motorcycle back-riding. Applying Max Weber’s view on the necessity of scientific expertise in rulemaking, and using government and media reports, the article analyzes the scientific foundation of the MPSR rulemaking by the Philippine Inter-agency Task Force on Emerging Infectious Disease (IATF-EID) and National Task Force (NTF), the country’s top task forces against COVID-19. It argues that a truly science-based approach to rulemaking must be based on sound scientific evidence and consultation with scientists, experts, interest groups, and the motorcycle riding public, before crafting and implementing regulation. Results showed that the use of the shield in motorcycle back-riding can cause the spread of the virus instead of preventing it, especially in motorcycle taxis. The use of a common helmet and the inevitable physical contact between the driver and the back rider may cause infection if one rider is positive, as scientific studies indicate that touching contaminated surfaces can cause transmission. It is also an added expense, unsafe, and prone to accidents as the shield obstructs the motorcycle’s aerodynamics and balance. Lastly, no comprehensive scientific study and consultations with experts and riders before the MPSR was crafted and implemented by the NTF. Ultimately, this article contends that the government’s claim to a science-based strategy against COVID-19 can remain elusive if it fails to address the country’s lack of a reliable scientific advisory group and if it fails to amend the new Philippine Administrative Code to require regulators to strictly follow sound science in rulemaking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Civic and Political Studies
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Civic and Political Studies Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信