内战时期密苏里州强奸德国妇女的实例

R. Frizzell
{"title":"内战时期密苏里州强奸德国妇女的实例","authors":"R. Frizzell","doi":"10.17161/ygas.v48i.18755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historians continue to debate the character o f the American Civil War nearly a century and a half after its end. Mark Neely, in a Harvard University Press monograph entitled The Civil War and the Limits o f Destruction, has challenged James McPherson’s characterization o f the war between North and South as a “total war.” Neely contends the Civil War was “remarkable for its traditional restraint.” In reviewing Neely’s book, McPherson said in his own defense that while the war may not have been the “total war” that he called it a few decades ago, it was certainly a “hard war,” filled with property destruction and civilian death.' Both McPherson and Neely use events in Missouri as a central pillar to support their contrasting positions. O f Missouri, McPherson says. That state had a civil war within the Civil War, a war o f neighbor against neighbor and sometimes literally brother against brother, an armed conflict along the Kansas border, which went back to 1854 and never really stopped, o f ugly, vicious, no-holds-barred bushwhacking that came close to total war.” ̂ Neely, in writing o f Price’s 1864 raid into Missouri, says “Neither side fought without restraint. Neither unleashed the full fury o f unbridled wrath. Events remained under control.”^ This paper is not going to resolve the dispute between two o f Americas most respected Civil War historians, but it does assert that the guerrilla warfare in western Missouri in 1864 was, in one respect, worse than historians have known up to now. Specifically, there are good reasons to believe that “Bloody Bill” Anderson’s men gang-raped a significant number o f German immigrant women along the Lafayette County border on October 10, 1864.","PeriodicalId":83559,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of German-American studies","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Instance of the Rape of German Women in Civil War Missouri\",\"authors\":\"R. Frizzell\",\"doi\":\"10.17161/ygas.v48i.18755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Historians continue to debate the character o f the American Civil War nearly a century and a half after its end. Mark Neely, in a Harvard University Press monograph entitled The Civil War and the Limits o f Destruction, has challenged James McPherson’s characterization o f the war between North and South as a “total war.” Neely contends the Civil War was “remarkable for its traditional restraint.” In reviewing Neely’s book, McPherson said in his own defense that while the war may not have been the “total war” that he called it a few decades ago, it was certainly a “hard war,” filled with property destruction and civilian death.' Both McPherson and Neely use events in Missouri as a central pillar to support their contrasting positions. O f Missouri, McPherson says. That state had a civil war within the Civil War, a war o f neighbor against neighbor and sometimes literally brother against brother, an armed conflict along the Kansas border, which went back to 1854 and never really stopped, o f ugly, vicious, no-holds-barred bushwhacking that came close to total war.” ̂ Neely, in writing o f Price’s 1864 raid into Missouri, says “Neither side fought without restraint. Neither unleashed the full fury o f unbridled wrath. Events remained under control.”^ This paper is not going to resolve the dispute between two o f Americas most respected Civil War historians, but it does assert that the guerrilla warfare in western Missouri in 1864 was, in one respect, worse than historians have known up to now. Specifically, there are good reasons to believe that “Bloody Bill” Anderson’s men gang-raped a significant number o f German immigrant women along the Lafayette County border on October 10, 1864.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yearbook of German-American studies\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yearbook of German-American studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17161/ygas.v48i.18755\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of German-American studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/ygas.v48i.18755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在美国内战结束近一个半世纪后,历史学家们仍在争论它的性质。马克·尼利在哈佛大学出版社出版的专著《内战与毁灭的极限》中,对詹姆斯·麦克弗森将南北战争描述为“全面战争”的说法提出了质疑。尼利认为,南北战争“因其传统的克制而引人注目”。在评论尼利的书时,麦克弗森为自己辩护说,虽然这场战争可能不是他几十年前所说的“全面战争”,但它肯定是一场“硬仗”,充满了财产破坏和平民死亡。麦克弗森和尼利都以密苏里州的事件为中心,来支持他们截然不同的立场。麦克弗森说,密苏里州。这个州在内战中发生了一场内战,一场邻居与邻居之间的战争,有时甚至是兄弟与兄弟之间的战争,一场沿着堪萨斯边境的武装冲突,可以追溯到1854年,从来没有真正停止过,这是一场丑陋,恶毒,肆无忌惮的丛林袭击,接近全面战争。尼利在描述普赖斯1864年突袭密苏里时写道:“双方都没有节制地战斗。”两人都没有释放出完全的愤怒或肆无忌惮的愤怒。事件仍在控制之中。这篇论文并不打算解决美国两位最受尊敬的内战历史学家之间的争论,但它确实断言,1864年密苏里西部的游击战在某一方面比历史学家迄今所知道的要糟糕。具体来说,有充分的理由相信“血腥比尔”安德森的人在1864年10月10日沿着拉斐特县边境轮奸了大量的德国移民妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Instance of the Rape of German Women in Civil War Missouri
Historians continue to debate the character o f the American Civil War nearly a century and a half after its end. Mark Neely, in a Harvard University Press monograph entitled The Civil War and the Limits o f Destruction, has challenged James McPherson’s characterization o f the war between North and South as a “total war.” Neely contends the Civil War was “remarkable for its traditional restraint.” In reviewing Neely’s book, McPherson said in his own defense that while the war may not have been the “total war” that he called it a few decades ago, it was certainly a “hard war,” filled with property destruction and civilian death.' Both McPherson and Neely use events in Missouri as a central pillar to support their contrasting positions. O f Missouri, McPherson says. That state had a civil war within the Civil War, a war o f neighbor against neighbor and sometimes literally brother against brother, an armed conflict along the Kansas border, which went back to 1854 and never really stopped, o f ugly, vicious, no-holds-barred bushwhacking that came close to total war.” ̂ Neely, in writing o f Price’s 1864 raid into Missouri, says “Neither side fought without restraint. Neither unleashed the full fury o f unbridled wrath. Events remained under control.”^ This paper is not going to resolve the dispute between two o f Americas most respected Civil War historians, but it does assert that the guerrilla warfare in western Missouri in 1864 was, in one respect, worse than historians have known up to now. Specifically, there are good reasons to believe that “Bloody Bill” Anderson’s men gang-raped a significant number o f German immigrant women along the Lafayette County border on October 10, 1864.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信