行政理由给出的参数

Alexander W. Resar
{"title":"行政理由给出的参数","authors":"Alexander W. Resar","doi":"10.17161/1808.27735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of what factors an agency may rely upon to justify a particular implementation of a statutory mandate underpins much of administrative law. Whether reviewing the Environmental Protection Agency’s implementation of national primary ambient air quality standards under the Clean Air Act’s mandate to establish levels “requisite to protect the public health” or the Social Security Administration’s interpretation of disability under the Social Security Act, a court must engage the justifications an agency provided for its action. In this way, agency reason giving facilitates judicial control of administration, and judicial assessment of an agency’s reasons necessarily entails assessment of the factors upon which an agency relied to reach any particular conclusion. Administrative reason giving occurs within statutory and political contexts that determine the sufficiency of reasons an agency provided. If the judicial review that administrative reason giving facilitates is to have","PeriodicalId":83417,"journal":{"name":"University of Kansas law review. University of Kansas. School of Law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\",,,The Parameters of Administrative Reason Giving\",\"authors\":\"Alexander W. Resar\",\"doi\":\"10.17161/1808.27735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The question of what factors an agency may rely upon to justify a particular implementation of a statutory mandate underpins much of administrative law. Whether reviewing the Environmental Protection Agency’s implementation of national primary ambient air quality standards under the Clean Air Act’s mandate to establish levels “requisite to protect the public health” or the Social Security Administration’s interpretation of disability under the Social Security Act, a court must engage the justifications an agency provided for its action. In this way, agency reason giving facilitates judicial control of administration, and judicial assessment of an agency’s reasons necessarily entails assessment of the factors upon which an agency relied to reach any particular conclusion. Administrative reason giving occurs within statutory and political contexts that determine the sufficiency of reasons an agency provided. If the judicial review that administrative reason giving facilitates is to have\",\"PeriodicalId\":83417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Kansas law review. University of Kansas. School of Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Kansas law review. University of Kansas. School of Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17161/1808.27735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Kansas law review. University of Kansas. School of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/1808.27735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个机构可以依靠什么因素来证明执行法定任务是正当的,这个问题是行政法的基础。无论是审查环境保护局根据《清洁空气法》的授权制定的“保护公众健康所必需”的国家初级环境空气质量标准的执行情况,还是审查社会保障局根据《社会保障法》对残疾的解释,法院都必须考虑机构为其行动提供的理由。这样,机关给出理由有利于司法控制行政,对机关理由的司法评估必然需要对机关得出任何特定结论所依赖的因素进行评估。行政理由的给出是在法律和政治背景下发生的,这决定了一个机构提供的理由是否充分。如行政事由便利的司法审查是有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
,,,The Parameters of Administrative Reason Giving
The question of what factors an agency may rely upon to justify a particular implementation of a statutory mandate underpins much of administrative law. Whether reviewing the Environmental Protection Agency’s implementation of national primary ambient air quality standards under the Clean Air Act’s mandate to establish levels “requisite to protect the public health” or the Social Security Administration’s interpretation of disability under the Social Security Act, a court must engage the justifications an agency provided for its action. In this way, agency reason giving facilitates judicial control of administration, and judicial assessment of an agency’s reasons necessarily entails assessment of the factors upon which an agency relied to reach any particular conclusion. Administrative reason giving occurs within statutory and political contexts that determine the sufficiency of reasons an agency provided. If the judicial review that administrative reason giving facilitates is to have
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信