{"title":"Nahshon Gaon:日历学者还是伪作者?","authors":"N. Vidro","doi":"10.1628/jsq-2019-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article studies Nahshon Gaon’s association with the Jewish calendar. Nahshon ben Zadok Gaon, a ninth-century head of the academy of Sura, is credited with developing a system of calendation known as the “Iggul of R. Nahshon” and considered the Gaon’s most reliably attributable work. Based on a corpus of over two hundred medieval and early-modern sources, the article questions the historicity of this attribution. The article identifies six different calendar schemes ascribed in the sources to Nahshon Gaon under the title Iggul and demonstrates that such attributions are pseudoepigraphic and predominantly Ashkenazi. Nahshon Gaon’s name first appears in late 12th-century Ashkenazi calendar sources, linked to a reiterative calendar for 247 years. Other schemes copied under the title Iggul are later and their attribution to Nahshon Gaon reflects the fact that the Gaon came to be perceived as a calendar authority.","PeriodicalId":42583,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Studies Quarterly","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nahshon Gaon: Calendar Scholar or Pseudo-author?\",\"authors\":\"N. Vidro\",\"doi\":\"10.1628/jsq-2019-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article studies Nahshon Gaon’s association with the Jewish calendar. Nahshon ben Zadok Gaon, a ninth-century head of the academy of Sura, is credited with developing a system of calendation known as the “Iggul of R. Nahshon” and considered the Gaon’s most reliably attributable work. Based on a corpus of over two hundred medieval and early-modern sources, the article questions the historicity of this attribution. The article identifies six different calendar schemes ascribed in the sources to Nahshon Gaon under the title Iggul and demonstrates that such attributions are pseudoepigraphic and predominantly Ashkenazi. Nahshon Gaon’s name first appears in late 12th-century Ashkenazi calendar sources, linked to a reiterative calendar for 247 years. Other schemes copied under the title Iggul are later and their attribution to Nahshon Gaon reflects the fact that the Gaon came to be perceived as a calendar authority.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jewish Studies Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jewish Studies Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1628/jsq-2019-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jewish Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1628/jsq-2019-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇文章研究了Nahshon Gaon与犹太历法的关系。Nahshon ben Zadok Gaon是九世纪苏拉学院的院长,他被认为开发了一套名为“R. Nahshon Iggul”的日历系统,并被认为是Gaon最可靠的工作。基于200多个中世纪和早期现代资料的语料库,文章质疑这种归属的历史性。这篇文章确定了六种不同的历法,这些历法在资料来源中以Iggul的名义归于Nahshon Gaon,并证明这些历法是伪铭文,主要是德系犹太人。Nahshon Gaon的名字首次出现在12世纪晚期的德系犹太历中,与247年的重复历法有关。其他以Iggul的名义复制的方案是后来的,它们被归为Nahshon Gaon反映了Gaon被视为日历权威的事实。
This article studies Nahshon Gaon’s association with the Jewish calendar. Nahshon ben Zadok Gaon, a ninth-century head of the academy of Sura, is credited with developing a system of calendation known as the “Iggul of R. Nahshon” and considered the Gaon’s most reliably attributable work. Based on a corpus of over two hundred medieval and early-modern sources, the article questions the historicity of this attribution. The article identifies six different calendar schemes ascribed in the sources to Nahshon Gaon under the title Iggul and demonstrates that such attributions are pseudoepigraphic and predominantly Ashkenazi. Nahshon Gaon’s name first appears in late 12th-century Ashkenazi calendar sources, linked to a reiterative calendar for 247 years. Other schemes copied under the title Iggul are later and their attribution to Nahshon Gaon reflects the fact that the Gaon came to be perceived as a calendar authority.