{"title":"马萨诸塞州环境信托基金","authors":"Charles H. W. Foster, Frances H. Foster","doi":"10.15779/Z38KC39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1988, the Massachusetts legislature established the Massachusetts Environmental Trust to administer Boston Harbor pollution settlement funds. Since that time, the Massachusetts Environmental Trust has emerged as a national model for innovative management and distribution of environmental settlement funds. This Article presents a history and analysis of the Trust based on personal accounts by Massachusetts Environmental Trust insiders and archival records. The analysis exposes significant flaws in environmental settlement practices. The settlement process is unpredictable and opaque. The settling parties often lack the expertise needed to apply settlement funds effectively. Yet, they fail to consult, involve, or inform those who could best assist in that effort—affected communities and environmental experts. Settlement terms frequently value punishment and deterrence over environmental benefit. Even when settlements seek to address environmental damage, they define that damage too narrowly. As a result, the funds often go to short-term, small-scale, or even unrelated projects while much of the damage that was the subject of the settlement remains unaddressed. The Massachusetts Environmental Trust provides an environmentcentered model designed to enhance predictability, transparency, participation, and expanded use of settlement funds. The Massachusetts Environmental Trust’s experience demonstrates that an independent third party with environmental expertise and community knowledge, contacts, and reputation","PeriodicalId":45532,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Law Quarterly","volume":"41 1","pages":"751"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Massachusetts Environmental Trust\",\"authors\":\"Charles H. W. Foster, Frances H. Foster\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z38KC39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1988, the Massachusetts legislature established the Massachusetts Environmental Trust to administer Boston Harbor pollution settlement funds. Since that time, the Massachusetts Environmental Trust has emerged as a national model for innovative management and distribution of environmental settlement funds. This Article presents a history and analysis of the Trust based on personal accounts by Massachusetts Environmental Trust insiders and archival records. The analysis exposes significant flaws in environmental settlement practices. The settlement process is unpredictable and opaque. The settling parties often lack the expertise needed to apply settlement funds effectively. Yet, they fail to consult, involve, or inform those who could best assist in that effort—affected communities and environmental experts. Settlement terms frequently value punishment and deterrence over environmental benefit. Even when settlements seek to address environmental damage, they define that damage too narrowly. As a result, the funds often go to short-term, small-scale, or even unrelated projects while much of the damage that was the subject of the settlement remains unaddressed. The Massachusetts Environmental Trust provides an environmentcentered model designed to enhance predictability, transparency, participation, and expanded use of settlement funds. The Massachusetts Environmental Trust’s experience demonstrates that an independent third party with environmental expertise and community knowledge, contacts, and reputation\",\"PeriodicalId\":45532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology Law Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"751\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology Law Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38KC39\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Law Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38KC39","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
In 1988, the Massachusetts legislature established the Massachusetts Environmental Trust to administer Boston Harbor pollution settlement funds. Since that time, the Massachusetts Environmental Trust has emerged as a national model for innovative management and distribution of environmental settlement funds. This Article presents a history and analysis of the Trust based on personal accounts by Massachusetts Environmental Trust insiders and archival records. The analysis exposes significant flaws in environmental settlement practices. The settlement process is unpredictable and opaque. The settling parties often lack the expertise needed to apply settlement funds effectively. Yet, they fail to consult, involve, or inform those who could best assist in that effort—affected communities and environmental experts. Settlement terms frequently value punishment and deterrence over environmental benefit. Even when settlements seek to address environmental damage, they define that damage too narrowly. As a result, the funds often go to short-term, small-scale, or even unrelated projects while much of the damage that was the subject of the settlement remains unaddressed. The Massachusetts Environmental Trust provides an environmentcentered model designed to enhance predictability, transparency, participation, and expanded use of settlement funds. The Massachusetts Environmental Trust’s experience demonstrates that an independent third party with environmental expertise and community knowledge, contacts, and reputation
期刊介绍:
Ecology Law Quarterly"s primary function is to produce two high quality journals: a quarterly print version and a more frequent, cutting-edge online journal, Ecology Law Currents. UC Berkeley School of Law students manage every aspect of ELQ, from communicating with authors to editing articles to publishing the journals. In addition to featuring work by leading environmental law scholars, ELQ encourages student writing and publishes student pieces.