防止针刺伤的新标准

J. Wick
{"title":"防止针刺伤的新标准","authors":"J. Wick","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2001.7.5.349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ecent legislation revising the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) regulations on preventing needle-stick injuries (NSI) became mandatory in April 2001 and impacts managed care providers and their members in interesting ways. The most immediate impact requires the consideration of the use of sharps that employ safety features; if alternatives to the use of sharps exist, these too should be employed. Say “occupational hazard” and most people will envision hard hats, safety glasses, and heavy industrial equipment. But carpal-tunnel syndrome and back strain have largely displaced mangled limbs as occupational hazards. Consequently, workplace hazards don’t seem as dangerous. Workers routinely develop healthy respect for certain tools, and circumstances command appropriate precautions. For health care workers, the hypodermic syringe is one such tool. Federal interventions address all types of sharps (any device that has a needle or sharp device attached to it). Syringes, however, are of most importance to managed care pharmacy. Certain questions arise regarding their use. Why are syringes and needles such a problem? In an era in which cost containment is an increasing challenge, what budget impact will new safety devices have? How will the switch to non-injectable alternatives affect the formulary or the multi-tiered payment structure? Will legislation, particularly at the state level, eventually extend to outpatient dispensing of syringes? Should these safety devices be covered for members who use injectable drugs at home now? Unquestionably, syringes and needles save lives and are a staple in our arsenal of medical devices, but we have known for decades that injury with a contaminated needle can transmit disease. For years, our main concern was hepatitis. Today, more than 20 blood-borne pathogens have been transmitted via a needlestick-related injury. Three are of particular concern: hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus. Table 1, page 350, describes the perils associated with each of these. In 1983, 17,000 workers acquired hepatitis B; today experts estimate that better work practices have reduced the number remarkably—to 800 annually. Better work practices, education, and personal protective equipment have successfully reduced transmission of all blood-borne pathogens over the past decades. They have, however, reached the limits of their efficacy. Changes in equipment design are now necessary to further decrease NSI.","PeriodicalId":50156,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Standards To Prevent Needle-stick Injury\",\"authors\":\"J. Wick\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/jmcp.2001.7.5.349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ecent legislation revising the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) regulations on preventing needle-stick injuries (NSI) became mandatory in April 2001 and impacts managed care providers and their members in interesting ways. The most immediate impact requires the consideration of the use of sharps that employ safety features; if alternatives to the use of sharps exist, these too should be employed. Say “occupational hazard” and most people will envision hard hats, safety glasses, and heavy industrial equipment. But carpal-tunnel syndrome and back strain have largely displaced mangled limbs as occupational hazards. Consequently, workplace hazards don’t seem as dangerous. Workers routinely develop healthy respect for certain tools, and circumstances command appropriate precautions. For health care workers, the hypodermic syringe is one such tool. Federal interventions address all types of sharps (any device that has a needle or sharp device attached to it). Syringes, however, are of most importance to managed care pharmacy. Certain questions arise regarding their use. Why are syringes and needles such a problem? In an era in which cost containment is an increasing challenge, what budget impact will new safety devices have? How will the switch to non-injectable alternatives affect the formulary or the multi-tiered payment structure? Will legislation, particularly at the state level, eventually extend to outpatient dispensing of syringes? Should these safety devices be covered for members who use injectable drugs at home now? Unquestionably, syringes and needles save lives and are a staple in our arsenal of medical devices, but we have known for decades that injury with a contaminated needle can transmit disease. For years, our main concern was hepatitis. Today, more than 20 blood-borne pathogens have been transmitted via a needlestick-related injury. Three are of particular concern: hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus. Table 1, page 350, describes the perils associated with each of these. In 1983, 17,000 workers acquired hepatitis B; today experts estimate that better work practices have reduced the number remarkably—to 800 annually. Better work practices, education, and personal protective equipment have successfully reduced transmission of all blood-borne pathogens over the past decades. They have, however, reached the limits of their efficacy. Changes in equipment design are now necessary to further decrease NSI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2001.7.5.349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2001.7.5.349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2001年4月,修订职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)关于预防针刺伤害(NSI)的规定的最新立法成为强制性的,并以有趣的方式影响管理护理提供者及其成员。最直接的影响需要考虑使用具有安全特性的利器;如果有替代使用利器的方法,也应该采用这些方法。说到“职业危害”,大多数人会想到安全帽、安全眼镜和重型工业设备。但是腕管综合症和背部劳损已经在很大程度上取代了伤残的肢体,成为职业危害。因此,工作场所的危险似乎不那么危险。工人们通常会对某些工具产生健康的尊重,情况要求采取适当的预防措施。对于卫生保健工作者来说,皮下注射器就是这样一种工具。联邦政府的干预措施涉及所有类型的利器(任何带有针或尖锐装置的设备)。注射器,然而,是最重要的管理护理药房。关于它们的使用出现了一些问题。为什么注射器和针头是一个问题?在一个成本控制日益成为挑战的时代,新的安全设备将对预算产生怎样的影响?转向非注射替代品将如何影响处方或多层支付结构?立法,特别是在州一级,最终会扩展到门诊注射器的分配吗?现在在家使用注射药物的成员是否应该包括这些安全装置?毫无疑问,注射器和针头挽救了生命,是我们医疗设备库中的主要设备,但几十年来我们都知道,被污染的针头造成的伤害会传播疾病。多年来,我们主要担心的是肝炎。今天,已有20多种血源性病原体通过针头相关损伤传播。有三种病毒特别值得关注:乙型肝炎病毒、丙型肝炎病毒和人类免疫缺陷病毒。表1,第350页,描述了与这些相关的危险。1983年,17000名工人感染了乙型肝炎;如今,专家估计,更好的工作实践已经显著减少了这一数字——每年减少到800人。在过去几十年中,更好的工作实践、教育和个人防护装备成功地减少了所有血源性病原体的传播。然而,它们的效力已经达到了极限。现在有必要改变设备设计以进一步降低NSI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Standards To Prevent Needle-stick Injury
ecent legislation revising the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) regulations on preventing needle-stick injuries (NSI) became mandatory in April 2001 and impacts managed care providers and their members in interesting ways. The most immediate impact requires the consideration of the use of sharps that employ safety features; if alternatives to the use of sharps exist, these too should be employed. Say “occupational hazard” and most people will envision hard hats, safety glasses, and heavy industrial equipment. But carpal-tunnel syndrome and back strain have largely displaced mangled limbs as occupational hazards. Consequently, workplace hazards don’t seem as dangerous. Workers routinely develop healthy respect for certain tools, and circumstances command appropriate precautions. For health care workers, the hypodermic syringe is one such tool. Federal interventions address all types of sharps (any device that has a needle or sharp device attached to it). Syringes, however, are of most importance to managed care pharmacy. Certain questions arise regarding their use. Why are syringes and needles such a problem? In an era in which cost containment is an increasing challenge, what budget impact will new safety devices have? How will the switch to non-injectable alternatives affect the formulary or the multi-tiered payment structure? Will legislation, particularly at the state level, eventually extend to outpatient dispensing of syringes? Should these safety devices be covered for members who use injectable drugs at home now? Unquestionably, syringes and needles save lives and are a staple in our arsenal of medical devices, but we have known for decades that injury with a contaminated needle can transmit disease. For years, our main concern was hepatitis. Today, more than 20 blood-borne pathogens have been transmitted via a needlestick-related injury. Three are of particular concern: hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus. Table 1, page 350, describes the perils associated with each of these. In 1983, 17,000 workers acquired hepatitis B; today experts estimate that better work practices have reduced the number remarkably—to 800 annually. Better work practices, education, and personal protective equipment have successfully reduced transmission of all blood-borne pathogens over the past decades. They have, however, reached the limits of their efficacy. Changes in equipment design are now necessary to further decrease NSI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信