{"title":"社区药房与第三方付款人议价:对议价结果的影响","authors":"W. Doucette","doi":"10.18553/JMCP.2001.7.1.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES: To address the gaps in knowledge of pharmacies' evaluation of third-party contracts and the bargaining process between community pharmacies and third parties by: (1) assessing what activities pharmacies regularly perform in evaluating and signing a third-party contract; (2) determining which bargaining activities are occurring between pharmacies and third-party payors; and (3) evaluating the associations among the characteristics of the bargaining parties, the bargaining process, and bargaining outcomes with community pharmacies and third-party payors. DESIGN: Mail survey. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 900 independent and small-chain pharmacies. RESULTS: Ofthe 863 delivered surveys, 308 (35.7%) were returned and analyzed. Respondents did not report a high level of formal contract evaluation. They reported, on average, that they rarely requested a change in a contract. This was consistent with the finding that third parties usually refuse to negotiate changes in a contract. The respondents reported that sometimes they did not sign a contract because of unacceptable terms. Multiple regres~ sions for two bargaining outcomesequity of contractual terms and satisfaction with a third party payor-were significant. The same bargainer and bargaining process variables were used as the independent variables in the regressions. For equity of contractual terms (R Square=0.442), significant associations were found for contending, problem solving, and dependence symmetry. For satisfaction with a third-party payor (R Square=OA29), significant associations were found for collaborative communication, contending, and dependence symmetry. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacies should develop strategies to improve communication with third parties. The symmetry of dependence between a pharmacy and a third-party payor is a key influence on bargaining outcomes. The strategies employed during bargaining, such as contending or problem solving, also affect bargaining outcomes.","PeriodicalId":50156,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bargaining Between Community Pharmacies and Third-Party Payors: Influences on Bargaining Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"W. Doucette\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/JMCP.2001.7.1.43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES: To address the gaps in knowledge of pharmacies' evaluation of third-party contracts and the bargaining process between community pharmacies and third parties by: (1) assessing what activities pharmacies regularly perform in evaluating and signing a third-party contract; (2) determining which bargaining activities are occurring between pharmacies and third-party payors; and (3) evaluating the associations among the characteristics of the bargaining parties, the bargaining process, and bargaining outcomes with community pharmacies and third-party payors. DESIGN: Mail survey. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 900 independent and small-chain pharmacies. RESULTS: Ofthe 863 delivered surveys, 308 (35.7%) were returned and analyzed. Respondents did not report a high level of formal contract evaluation. They reported, on average, that they rarely requested a change in a contract. This was consistent with the finding that third parties usually refuse to negotiate changes in a contract. The respondents reported that sometimes they did not sign a contract because of unacceptable terms. Multiple regres~ sions for two bargaining outcomesequity of contractual terms and satisfaction with a third party payor-were significant. The same bargainer and bargaining process variables were used as the independent variables in the regressions. For equity of contractual terms (R Square=0.442), significant associations were found for contending, problem solving, and dependence symmetry. For satisfaction with a third-party payor (R Square=OA29), significant associations were found for collaborative communication, contending, and dependence symmetry. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacies should develop strategies to improve communication with third parties. The symmetry of dependence between a pharmacy and a third-party payor is a key influence on bargaining outcomes. The strategies employed during bargaining, such as contending or problem solving, also affect bargaining outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/JMCP.2001.7.1.43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/JMCP.2001.7.1.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bargaining Between Community Pharmacies and Third-Party Payors: Influences on Bargaining Outcomes
OBJECTIVES: To address the gaps in knowledge of pharmacies' evaluation of third-party contracts and the bargaining process between community pharmacies and third parties by: (1) assessing what activities pharmacies regularly perform in evaluating and signing a third-party contract; (2) determining which bargaining activities are occurring between pharmacies and third-party payors; and (3) evaluating the associations among the characteristics of the bargaining parties, the bargaining process, and bargaining outcomes with community pharmacies and third-party payors. DESIGN: Mail survey. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 900 independent and small-chain pharmacies. RESULTS: Ofthe 863 delivered surveys, 308 (35.7%) were returned and analyzed. Respondents did not report a high level of formal contract evaluation. They reported, on average, that they rarely requested a change in a contract. This was consistent with the finding that third parties usually refuse to negotiate changes in a contract. The respondents reported that sometimes they did not sign a contract because of unacceptable terms. Multiple regres~ sions for two bargaining outcomesequity of contractual terms and satisfaction with a third party payor-were significant. The same bargainer and bargaining process variables were used as the independent variables in the regressions. For equity of contractual terms (R Square=0.442), significant associations were found for contending, problem solving, and dependence symmetry. For satisfaction with a third-party payor (R Square=OA29), significant associations were found for collaborative communication, contending, and dependence symmetry. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacies should develop strategies to improve communication with third parties. The symmetry of dependence between a pharmacy and a third-party payor is a key influence on bargaining outcomes. The strategies employed during bargaining, such as contending or problem solving, also affect bargaining outcomes.