利用药房索赔数据评估治疗交换方案

S. Bull
{"title":"利用药房索赔数据评估治疗交换方案","authors":"S. Bull","doi":"10.18553/JMCP.1999.5.4.331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the accuracy of dosing guidelines and the overall success of a therapeutic' interchange program by analyzing pharmacy claims data. DESIGN: Evaluation of prescribing patterns via retrospective analysis of pharmacy claims data for therapeutic interchange between angiotensin II converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEls). SETTING: A California IPA-model HMO. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of conversion doses that corresponded with pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) guidelines variation among actual conversion doses utilized, and number of dosage titrations associated with implementing conversions. RESULTS: The analysis revealed that dosing ratios utilized to convert patients from lisinopril, quinapril, enalapril, and ramipril to benazepril HCI corresponded with P&T guidelines 83%, 78%, 54%, and 26% of the time, respectively. The variance in conversion doses from enalapril and ramipril was significantly greater than from lisinopril and quinapril (p less than O.01). The overall percent...","PeriodicalId":50156,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of Pharmacy Claims Data to Evaluate Therapeutic Interchange Programs\",\"authors\":\"S. Bull\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/JMCP.1999.5.4.331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the accuracy of dosing guidelines and the overall success of a therapeutic' interchange program by analyzing pharmacy claims data. DESIGN: Evaluation of prescribing patterns via retrospective analysis of pharmacy claims data for therapeutic interchange between angiotensin II converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEls). SETTING: A California IPA-model HMO. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of conversion doses that corresponded with pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) guidelines variation among actual conversion doses utilized, and number of dosage titrations associated with implementing conversions. RESULTS: The analysis revealed that dosing ratios utilized to convert patients from lisinopril, quinapril, enalapril, and ramipril to benazepril HCI corresponded with P&T guidelines 83%, 78%, 54%, and 26% of the time, respectively. The variance in conversion doses from enalapril and ramipril was significantly greater than from lisinopril and quinapril (p less than O.01). The overall percent...\",\"PeriodicalId\":50156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/JMCP.1999.5.4.331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/JMCP.1999.5.4.331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:通过分析药房索赔数据,深入了解给药指南的准确性和治疗性“交换”计划的总体成功。设计:通过回顾性分析血管紧张素II转换酶抑制剂(ACEls)之间治疗性交换的药房声明数据来评估处方模式。环境:加州ipa模式的HMO。主要结局指标:符合药学和治疗学(P&T)指南的转换剂量百分比,实际使用的转换剂量之间的差异,以及与实施转换相关的剂量滴定次数。结果:分析显示,用于将患者从赖诺普利、喹诺普利、依那普利和雷米普利转换为苯那普利HCI的剂量比分别符合P&T指南的83%、78%、54%和26%。依那普利和雷米普利的转换剂量差异显著大于赖诺普利和喹奈普利(p < 0.01)。总的百分比……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilization of Pharmacy Claims Data to Evaluate Therapeutic Interchange Programs
OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the accuracy of dosing guidelines and the overall success of a therapeutic' interchange program by analyzing pharmacy claims data. DESIGN: Evaluation of prescribing patterns via retrospective analysis of pharmacy claims data for therapeutic interchange between angiotensin II converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEls). SETTING: A California IPA-model HMO. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of conversion doses that corresponded with pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) guidelines variation among actual conversion doses utilized, and number of dosage titrations associated with implementing conversions. RESULTS: The analysis revealed that dosing ratios utilized to convert patients from lisinopril, quinapril, enalapril, and ramipril to benazepril HCI corresponded with P&T guidelines 83%, 78%, 54%, and 26% of the time, respectively. The variance in conversion doses from enalapril and ramipril was significantly greater than from lisinopril and quinapril (p less than O.01). The overall percent...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy
Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信